BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18031774)

  • 1. Assessment of the quality and quantity of genomic DNA recovered from canine blood samples by three different extraction methods.
    Clements DN; Wood S; Carter SD; Ollier WE
    Res Vet Sci; 2008 Aug; 85(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 18031774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparing and evaluating six methods of extracting human genomic DNA from whole blood].
    Chang JJ; Zhang SH; Li L
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 25(2):109-11, 114. PubMed ID: 19537249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of six methods for genomic DNA extraction suitable for PCR-based genotyping applications using ovine milk samples.
    Psifidi A; Dovas CI; Banos G
    Mol Cell Probes; 2010 Apr; 24(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 19900535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High salt method: a simple and rapid procedure for isolation of genomic DNA from buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) white blood cells.
    Aravindakshan TV; Nainar AM; Nachimuthu K
    Indian J Exp Biol; 1997 Aug; 35(8):903-5. PubMed ID: 9475068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing recovery rates of distinct exogenous controls for gDNA extraction efficiency using phenol-chloroform or silica-column based extractions.
    Lima Â; Sousa LGV; Macedo F; Muzny CA; Cerca N
    J Microbiol Methods; 2022 Dec; 203():106607. PubMed ID: 36343770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of six methods for extraction and purification of viral DNA from urine and serum samples.
    Bergallo M; Costa C; Gribaudo G; Tarallo S; Baro S; Negro Ponzi A; Cavallo R
    New Microbiol; 2006 Apr; 29(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 16841551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of methods for high quantity and quality genomic DNA extraction from raw cow milk.
    Usman T; Yu Y; Liu C; Fan Z; Wang Y
    Genet Mol Res; 2014 Apr; 13(2):3319-28. PubMed ID: 24841664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of five methods for extracting DNA from paucicellular clinical samples.
    Cler L; Bu D; Lewis C; Euhus D
    Mol Cell Probes; 2006; 20(3-4):191-6. PubMed ID: 16516438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extraction of genomic DNA using a new amino silica monolithic column.
    Liu L; Yu S; Yang S; Zhou P; Hu J; Zhang Y
    J Sep Sci; 2009 Aug; 32(15-16):2752-8. PubMed ID: 19585530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of strategies for the isolation of PCR-compatible, genomic DNA from a municipal biogas plants.
    Weiss A; Jérôme V; Freitag R
    J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2007 Jun; 853(1-2):190-7. PubMed ID: 17442638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic DNA extraction from whole blood stored from 15- to 30-years at -20 °C by rapid phenol-chloroform protocol: a useful tool for genetic epidemiology studies.
    Di Pietro F; Ortenzi F; Tilio M; Concetti F; Napolioni V
    Mol Cell Probes; 2011 Feb; 25(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 21029772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimizing gDNA extraction from fresh frozen meningioma tissue for downstream genetic analysis.
    Proctor DT; Yoo EH; Vujadinovic Z; Lama S; van Marle G; Sutherland GR
    Clin Biochem; 2017 Mar; 50(4-5):194-205. PubMed ID: 27871894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A reliable general purpose method for extracting genomic DNA from Dictyostelium cells.
    Pilcher KE; Fey P; Gaudet P; Kowal AS; Chisholm RL
    Nat Protoc; 2007; 2(6):1325-8. PubMed ID: 17545969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Co-precipitation of protein and polyester as a method to isolate high molecular weight DNA.
    Dixson JD
    Hereditas; 2005 Feb; 142(2005):22-3. PubMed ID: 16970607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative evaluation of four DNA extraction protocols from whole blood sample.
    Ghaheri M; Kahrizi D; Yari K; Babaie A; Suthar RS; Kazemi E
    Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 2016 Mar; 62(3):120-4. PubMed ID: 27064884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A widely applicable protocol for DNA isolation from fecal samples.
    Zhang BW; Li M; Ma LC; Wei FW
    Biochem Genet; 2006 Dec; 44(11-12):503-12. PubMed ID: 17094033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A high-throughput, high-quality plant genomic DNA extraction protocol.
    Li H; Li J; Cong XH; Duan YB; Li L; Wei PC; Lu XZ; Yang JB
    Genet Mol Res; 2013 Oct; 12(4):4526-39. PubMed ID: 24222228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Formamide as a denaturant for bisulfite conversion of genomic DNA: Bisulfite sequencing of the GSTPi and RARbeta2 genes of 43 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded prostate cancer specimens.
    Zon G; Barker MA; Kaur P; Groshen S; Jones LW; Imam SA; Boyd VL
    Anal Biochem; 2009 Sep; 392(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 19505431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A simple and rapid PCR-based method for ostrich sexing using micro amounts of DNA.
    Huang CW; Huang MC
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2008 Dec; 43(6):643-6. PubMed ID: 18954377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction: twenty-something years on.
    Chomczynski P; Sacchi N
    Nat Protoc; 2006; 1(2):581-5. PubMed ID: 17406285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.