362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18031854)
1. A quantitative image quality comparison of four different image guided radiotherapy devices.
Stützel J; Oelfke U; Nill S
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jan; 86(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 18031854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Phantom and in-vivo measurements of dose exposure by image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT): MV portal images vs. kV portal images vs. cone-beam CT.
Walter C; Boda-Heggemann J; Wertz H; Loeb I; Rahn A; Lohr F; Wenz F
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Dec; 85(3):418-23. PubMed ID: 18023491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Image-guided radiotherapy using a mobile kilovoltage x-ray device.
Sorensen SP; Chow PE; Kriminski S; Medin PM; Solberg TD
Med Dosim; 2006; 31(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 16551528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetric characterization of a cone-beam O-arm imaging system.
Zhang J; Weir V; Fajardo L; Lin J; Hsiung H; Ritenour ER
J Xray Sci Technol; 2009; 17(4):305-17. PubMed ID: 19923687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of X-ray tube parameters, iodine concentration, and patient size on image quality in pulmonary computed tomography angiography: a chest-phantom-study.
Szucs-Farkas Z; Verdun FR; von Allmen G; Mini RL; Vock P
Invest Radiol; 2008 Jun; 43(6):374-81. PubMed ID: 18496042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance characterization of megavoltage computed tomography imaging on a helical tomotherapy unit.
Meeks SL; Harmon JF; Langen KM; Willoughby TR; Wagner TH; Kupelian PA
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2673-81. PubMed ID: 16193798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of image quality and dose calculation accuracy on kV CBCT, MV CBCT, and MV CT images for urgent palliative radiotherapy treatments.
Held M; Cremers F; Sneed PK; Braunstein S; Fogh SE; Nakamura J; Barani I; Perez-Andujar A; Pouliot J; Morin O
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):279-290. PubMed ID: 27074487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of dose metrics and radiation risk models when optimizing CT x-ray tube voltage.
Huda W; Ogden KM; Khorasani MR
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4719-32. PubMed ID: 18695298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance characteristics of a novel megavoltage cone-beam-computed tomography device.
Fast MF; Koenig T; Oelfke U; Nill S
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Feb; 57(3):N15-24. PubMed ID: 22251668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Quality control of megavoltage cone beam CT imaging system].
Isambert A; Ferreira IH; Nicula LE; Bonniaud G; Lefkopoulos D
Cancer Radiother; 2008 Dec; 12(8):781-7. PubMed ID: 18691926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The adaptation of megavoltage cone beam CT for use in standard radiotherapy treatment planning.
Thomas TH; Devakumar D; Purnima S; Ravindran BP
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(7):2067-77. PubMed ID: 19287087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Energy-resolved computed tomography: first experimental results.
Shikhaliev PM
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Oct; 53(20):5595-613. PubMed ID: 18799830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance characteristics and quality assurance aspects of kilovoltage cone-beam CT on medical linear accelerator.
Saw CB; Yang Y; Li F; Yue NJ; Ding C; Komanduri K; Huq S; Heron DE
Med Dosim; 2007; 32(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 17472886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of an advanced image-based technique to calculate virtual monoenergetic computed tomographic images from a dual-energy examination to improve contrast-to-noise ratio in examinations using iodinated contrast media.
Grant KL; Flohr TG; Krauss B; Sedlmair M; Thomas C; Schmidt B
Invest Radiol; 2014 Sep; 49(9):586-92. PubMed ID: 24710203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A quality assurance phantom for the performance evaluation of volumetric micro-CT systems.
Du LY; Umoh J; Nikolov HN; Pollmann SI; Lee TY; Holdsworth DW
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(23):7087-108. PubMed ID: 18029995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Principles of CT: radiation dose and image quality.
Goldman LW
J Nucl Med Technol; 2007 Dec; 35(4):213-25; quiz 226-8. PubMed ID: 18006597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Calibration of CT values used for radiation treatment planning and its impact factors].
Qi ZY; Huang SM; Deng XW
Ai Zheng; 2006 Jan; 25(1):110-4. PubMed ID: 16405763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of tomotherapy imaging beam output instabilities on dose calculation.
Duchateau M; Tournel K; Verellen D; Van de Vondel I; Reynders T; Linthout N; Gevaert T; de Coninck P; Depuydt T; Storme G
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jun; 55(11):N329-36. PubMed ID: 20442461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A feasibility study on the use of digital tomosynthesis with individually-acquired megavoltage portal images for target localization.
Sarkar V; Shi C; Rassiah-Szegedi P; Eng T; Diaz A; Papanikolaou N
J BUON; 2009; 14(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 19365878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
