These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18032089)

  • 21. The effects of thoracic manipulation on posteroanterior spinal stiffness.
    Campbell BD; Snodgrass SJ
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2010 Nov; 40(11):685-93. PubMed ID: 20710095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dynamic response of the cervical spine to posteroanterior mobilisation.
    Lee RY; McGregor AH; Bull AM; Wragg P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2005 Feb; 20(2):228-31. PubMed ID: 15621330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Manual physical assessment of spinal segmental motion: intent and validity.
    Abbott JH; Flynn TW; Fritz JM; Hing WA; Reid D; Whitman JM
    Man Ther; 2009 Feb; 14(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 17997344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Changes in pressure pain thresholds over C5-C6 zygapophyseal joint after a cervicothoracic junction manipulation in healthy subjects.
    Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C; Alonso-Blanco C; Cleland JA; Rodríguez-Blanco C; Alburquerque-Sendín F
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2008 Jun; 31(5):332-7. PubMed ID: 18558274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cervical spine manipulation alters sensorimotor integration: a somatosensory evoked potential study.
    Haavik-Taylor H; Murphy B
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):391-402. PubMed ID: 17137836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Performance in the cranio-cervical flexion test is altered in elderly subjects.
    Uthaikhup S; Jull G
    Man Ther; 2009 Oct; 14(5):475-9. PubMed ID: 19171497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Validation of a sham manipulative procedure for the cervical spine for use in clinical trials.
    Vernon H; MacAdam K; Marshall V; Pion M; Sadowska M
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2005; 28(9):662-6. PubMed ID: 16326235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Tender point sensitivity, range of motion, and perceived disability in subjects with neck pain.
    Olson SL; O'Connor DP; Birmingham G; Broman P; Herrera L
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2000 Jan; 30(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 10705592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cervical spine mobilisation forces applied by physiotherapy students.
    Snodgrass SJ; Rivett DA; Robertson VJ; Stojanovski E
    Physiotherapy; 2010 Jun; 96(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 20420958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cervical mobility in women with migraine.
    Bevilaqua-Grossi D; Pegoretti KS; Goncalves MC; Speciali JG; Bordini CA; Bigal ME
    Headache; 2009 May; 49(5):726-31. PubMed ID: 18783446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Predictors for immediate and global responses to chiropractic manipulation of the cervical spine.
    Thiel HW; Bolton JE
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2008 Mar; 31(3):172-83. PubMed ID: 18394493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of cervical spine stiffness in individuals with chronic nonspecific neck pain and asymptomatic individuals.
    Ingram LA; Snodgrass SJ; Rivett DA
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2015 Mar; 45(3):162-9. PubMed ID: 25627153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cervical helical axis characteristics and its center of rotation during active head and upper arm movements-comparisons of whiplash-associated disorders, non-specific neck pain and asymptomatic individuals.
    Grip H; Sundelin G; Gerdle B; Stefan Karlsson J
    J Biomech; 2008 Sep; 41(13):2799-805. PubMed ID: 18707689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Rolfing structural integration treatment of cervical spine dysfunction.
    James H; Castaneda L; Miller ME; Findley T
    J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2009 Jul; 13(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 19524847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Inter-tester reliability of passive intervertebral and active movements of the cervical spine.
    Piva SR; Erhard RE; Childs JD; Browder DA
    Man Ther; 2006 Nov; 11(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 16837235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effects of high and low loading forces on measured values of lumbar stiffness.
    Latimer J; Lee M; Adams RD
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998; 21(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 9567234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. On "Manual therapy, exercise, and traction for patients with cervical radiculopathy..." Young IA, et al.Phys Ther. 2009;89:632-642.
    Thorpe DL
    Phys Ther; 2009 Nov; 89(11):1253; author reply 1253. PubMed ID: 19884641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cervical motion assessment using virtual reality.
    Sarig-Bahat H; Weiss PL; Laufer Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(10):1018-24. PubMed ID: 19404177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Foraminal stenosis with radiculopathy from a cervical disc herniation in a 33-year-old man treated with flexion distraction decompression manipulation.
    Gudavalli S; Kruse RA
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2008 Jun; 31(5):376-80. PubMed ID: 18558279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of age, gender, lifestyle factors and sub-clinical neck pain on the cervical flexion-rotation test and cervical range of motion.
    Smith K; Hall T; Robinson K
    Man Ther; 2008 Dec; 13(6):552-9. PubMed ID: 17945529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.