These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Comparison of retentiveness of amalgam bonding agent types. Winkler MM; Moore BK; Allen J; Rhodes B Oper Dent; 1997; 22(5):200-8. PubMed ID: 9484142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fracture resistance of complex amalgam restorations with peripheral shelves used as resistance features. Reagan SE; Gray SE; Hilton TJ Am J Dent; 1993 Oct; 6(5):225-8. PubMed ID: 7880463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of titanium dowel retention using four different luting agents. Balbosh A; Ludwig K; Kern M J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 16126075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Fracture strength of amalgam crowns with repaired endodontic access. Hachmeister KA; Dunn WJ; Murchison DF; Larsen RB Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 12022456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The pin-amalgam restoration. Part 1. A review. Evans JR; Wetz JH J Prosthet Dent; 1977 Jan; 37(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 318695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Shear bond strength of dental amalgam bonded to dentin. Covey DA; Moon PC Am J Dent; 1991 Feb; 4(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 1900693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Fracture strength of different core build-up designs. Bolhuis HPB ; De Gee AJ; Feilzer AJ; Davidson CL Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):286-90. PubMed ID: 11803991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The heat sink and its relationship to reducing heat during pin-reduction procedures. Knight JS; Smith HB Oper Dent; 1998; 23(6):299-302. PubMed ID: 9855852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys. Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Retention of threaded pins in amalgam. Podshadley AG J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Jan; 63(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 2404107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effect of resin composite pins on the retention of class IV restorations. Muhlbauer JA; Dunn WJ; Roberts HW; Murchison DF Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):284-8. PubMed ID: 12022461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Compressive shear strength of core materials and restoring techniques. Sahmali SM; Saygili G Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2000 Jun; 20(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 11203569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling. Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Shear bond strength of composite resin and amalgam adhesive systems to dentin. Evans DB; Neme AM Am J Dent; 1999 Feb; 12(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 10477994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Orthodontic band retention on primary molar stainless steel crowns. Beemer RL; Ferracane JL; Howard HE Pediatr Dent; 1993; 15(6):408-13. PubMed ID: 8153003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Torsional properties of stainless-steel and nickel-titanium files after multiple autoclave sterilizations. Hilt BR; Cunningham CJ; Shen C; Richards N J Endod; 2000 Feb; 26(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 11194376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]