These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18033945)

  • 1. Efficacy of a new software in eliminating the angulation errors in digital subtraction radiography.
    Güneri P; Göğüş S; Tuğsel Z; Boyacioğlu H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):484-9. PubMed ID: 18033945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical efficacy of a new software developed for dental digital subtraction radiography.
    Güneri P; Gögüs S; Tuğsel Z; Ozturk A; Gungor C; Boyacioğlu H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Nov; 35(6):417-21. PubMed ID: 17082332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of three methods of geometric image reconstruction for digital subtraction radiography.
    Queiroz PM; Oliveira ML; Tanaka JL; Soares MG; Haiter-Neto F; Ono E
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(7):20160120. PubMed ID: 27376702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of manual compared with reference point superimposition on image quality in digital subtraction radiography.
    Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1989 Nov; 18(4):145-50. PubMed ID: 2701173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative analysis of apical root resorption by means of digital subtraction radiography.
    Heo MS; Lee SS; Lee KH; Choi HM; Choi SC; Park TW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):369-73. PubMed ID: 11250638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Noise in subtraction images made from pairs of bitewing radiographs: a comparison between two subtraction programs.
    Haiter-Neto F; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Nov; 34(6):357-61. PubMed ID: 16227479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A retrospective study of digital subtraction technique to detect sclerotic changes in alveolar bone on intraoral radiographs of bisphosphonate-treated patients.
    Zaman MU; Nakamoto T; Tanimoto K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130242. PubMed ID: 24404602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance for obtaining maximal gain from a program for digital subtraction radiography.
    Aagaard E; Donslund C; Wenzel A; Sewerin I
    Scand J Dent Res; 1991 Apr; 99(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 2052898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Comparison of Technique Errors using Two Radiographic Intra-oral Receptor-holding Devices.
    Mauriello SM; Tang Q; Johnson KB; Hadgraft HH; Platin E
    J Dent Hyg; 2015 Dec; 89(6):384-9. PubMed ID: 26684996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Semiautomated image registration for digital subtraction radiography.
    Byrd V; Mayfield-Donahoo T; Reddy MS; Jeffcoat MK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Apr; 85(4):473-8. PubMed ID: 9574960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a dental subtraction radiography system.
    Ellwood RP; Davies RM; Worthington HV
    J Periodontal Res; 1997 Feb; 32(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 9089491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vivo determination of radiographic projection errors produced by a novel filmholder and an x-ray beam manipulator.
    Zappa U; Simona C; Graf H; van Aken J
    J Periodontol; 1991 Nov; 62(11):674-83. PubMed ID: 1753320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of x-ray angulation on radiographic periodontal ligament space width.
    Tibbetts J; Allen K; Hausmann E
    J Periodontol; 1992 Feb; 63(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 1552464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ROI-based image registration for digital subtraction radiography.
    Yi WJ; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC; Huh KH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):523-9. PubMed ID: 16545718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial resolution and angular alignment tolerance in radiometric analysis of alveolar bone change.
    Shrout MK; Weaver J; Potter BJ; Hildebolt CF
    J Periodontol; 1996 Jan; 67(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 8676272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and evaluation of digital subtraction radiography computer program.
    Lee SS; Huh YJ; Kim KY; Heo MS; Choi SC; Koak JY; Heo SJ; Han CH; Yi WJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Oct; 98(4):471-5. PubMed ID: 15472663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of an opto-electronic positioning device for serial direct digital images of oral structures.
    Morea C; Langlotz F; Scheer C; Bürgin W; Nolte LP; Lang NP; Brägger U
    J Periodontal Res; 2000 Aug; 35(4):225-31. PubMed ID: 10983883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of peri-implant bone level assessment in digitized conventional radiographs and digital subtraction images.
    Bittar-Cortez JA; Passeri LA; de Almeida SM; Haiter-Neto F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):258-62. PubMed ID: 16798922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subjective image quality of solid-state and photostimulable phosphor systems for digital intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E; Attaelmanan A; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 10808218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feasibility of local CT of dental tissues.
    van Daatselaar AN; Dunn SM; Spoelder HJ; Germans DM; Renambot L; Bal HE; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 May; 32(3):173-80. PubMed ID: 12917283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.