406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18033947)
1. Film tomography compared with film and digital bitewing radiography for proximal caries detection.
Peker I; Toraman Alkurt M; Altunkaynak B
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):495-9. PubMed ID: 18033947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection.
Alkurt MT; Peker I; Bala O; Altunkaynak B
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 17910228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth.
Akarslan ZZ; Akdevelioğlu M; Güngör K; Erten H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):458-63. PubMed ID: 19033431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Proximal caries detection: Sirona Sidexis versus Kodak Ektaspeed Plus.
Khan EA; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Caplan D
Gen Dent; 2005; 53(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 15779222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extraoral imaging for proximal caries detection: Bitewings vs scanogram.
Khan EA; Tyndall DA; Caplan D
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Dec; 98(6):730-7. PubMed ID: 15583548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Proximal caries detection accuracy using intraoral bitewing radiography, extraoral bitewing radiography and panoramic radiography.
Kamburoglu K; Kolsuz E; Murat S; Yüksel S; Ozen T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Sep; 41(6):450-9. PubMed ID: 22868296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the accuracy of digital and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of recurrent caries.
Anbiaee N; Mohassel AR; Imanimoghaddam M; Moazzami SM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Dec; 11(6):E025-32. PubMed ID: 21203734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of RVGui sensor and Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film for proximal caries detection.
Abreu M; Mol A; Ludlow JB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):381-5. PubMed ID: 11250640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two- and three-dimensional imaging modalities for the detection of caries. A comparison between film, digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
Abreu Júnior M; Tyndall DA; Platin E; Ludlow JB; Phillips C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 10740469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic accuracy of intraoral film and direct digital images for detection of simulated recurrent decay.
Nair MK; Ludlow JB; May KN; Nair UP; Johnson MP; Close JM
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 11357563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of conventional intra-oral radiography and computer imaging techniques for the detection of proximal surface dental caries.
Dove SB; McDavid WD
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 Aug; 21(3):127-34. PubMed ID: 1397467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro comparison of digital and conventional bitewing radiographs for the detection of approximal caries in primary teeth exposed and viewed by a new wireless handheld unit.
Ulusu T; Bodur H; Odabaş ME
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Feb; 39(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 20100920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ex vivo evaluation of new 2D and 3D dental radiographic technology for detecting caries.
Gaalaas L; Tyndall D; Mol A; Everett ET; Bangdiwala A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(3):20150281. PubMed ID: 26670605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition.
Uprichard KK; Potter BJ; Russell CM; Schafer TE; Adair S; Weller RN
Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10730280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of noise on the compressibility and diagnostic accuracy for caries detection of digital bitewing radiographs.
Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC; Geraets WG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 10202472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of film, desktop monitor and laptop displays in caries detection.
Ludlow JB; Abreu M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 10202475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of displayed image size on radiographic detection of approximal caries.
Haak R; Wicht MJ; Nowak G; Hellmich M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):242-6. PubMed ID: 13679355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of extraoral tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT) for proximal caries detection.
Harase Y; Araki K; Okano T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):791-6. PubMed ID: 16731402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital camera resolution and proximal caries detection.
Prapayasatok S; Janhom A; Verochana K; Pramojanee S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 16798921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
