211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18033949)
21. Absorbed dose in AgBr in direct film for photon energies ( < 150 keV): relation to optical density. Theoretical calculation and experimental evaluation.
Helmrot E; Alm Carlsson G
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 402():1-50. PubMed ID: 8677807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Conversion coefficients for the estimation of effective doses in intraoral and panoramic dental radiology from dose-area product values.
Looe HK; Eenboom F; Chofor N; Pfaffenberger A; Steinhoff M; Rühmann A; Poplawski A; Willborn K; Poppe B
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):365-73. PubMed ID: 18550517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Absorbed organ and effective doses from digital intra-oral and panoramic radiography applying the ICRP 103 recommendations for effective dose estimations.
Granlund C; Thilander-Klang A; Ylhan B; Lofthag-Hansen S; Ekestubbe A
Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20151052. PubMed ID: 27452261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Paediatric absorbed doses from rotational panoramic radiography.
Hayakawa Y; Kobayashi N; Kuroyanagi K; Nishizawa K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):285-92. PubMed ID: 11571549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effective and organ doses from scanography and zonography: a comparison with periapical radiography.
Ekestubbe A; Thilander-Klang A; Lith A; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 15313999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study.
Schindera ST; Nelson RC; Yoshizumi T; Toncheva G; Nguyen G; DeLong DM; Szucs-Farkas Z
Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):997-1002. PubMed ID: 19409820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The reduction in radiation dose for intra-oral radiographs by the use of thin K-edge filters.
MacDonald-Jankowski DS; Lawinski CP
Br J Radiol; 1991 Jun; 64(762):524-8. PubMed ID: 2070183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effective dose equivalent from intraoral radiography.
Stenström B; Henrikson CO; Karlsson L; Sarby B
Swed Dent J; 1987; 11(1-2):71-7. PubMed ID: 3473713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The Effects on Absorbed Dose Distribution in Intraoral X-ray Imaging When Using Tube Voltages of 60 and 70 kV for Bitewing Imaging.
Hellén-Halme K; Nilsson M
J Oral Maxillofac Res; 2013; 4(3):e2. PubMed ID: 24422035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of computed radiography and film/screen combination using a contrast-detail phantom.
Lu ZF; Nickoloff EL; So JC; Dutta AK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2003; 4(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 12540823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Radiological characteristics of lead foils in dental film packets: analysis of components and shielding effect.
Araki K; Kanda S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 Feb; 21(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 1397446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 4: Entrance doses achieved during the X-ray examination of the chest].
Seidenbusch MC; Schneider K
Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1082-103. PubMed ID: 19009497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Radiologic exposure of the dental patient: comparison of the doses delivered by different techniques].
Jones P; Reychler H; Engels H; Wambersie A
Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2007; 62(1):4-24. PubMed ID: 18506961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Image quality assessment and radiation doses in intraoral radiography.
Yakoumakis EN; Tierris CE; Stefanou EP; Phanourakis IG; Proukakis CC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 11250637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Does dose optimisation in digital panoramic radiography affect diagnostic performance?
Martins LAC; Brasil DM; Forner LA; Viccari C; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ; Oliveira ML
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Feb; 25(2):637-643. PubMed ID: 32845471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Attitude of the Belgian dentist population towards radiation protection.
Jacobs R; Vanderstappen M; Bogaerts R; Gijbels F
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 15585812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Absorbed doses to critical organs from full mouth dental radiography].
Zhang G; Yasuhiko O; Hidegiko Y
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Jan; 34(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11776538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Multi-detector row CT: radiation dose characteristics.
Hamberg LM; Rhea JT; Hunter GJ; Thrall JH
Radiology; 2003 Mar; 226(3):762-72. PubMed ID: 12616020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Radiochromic films for dental CT dosimetry: a feasibility study.
Rampado O; Bianchi SD; Peruzzo Cornetto A; Rossetti V; Ropolo R
Phys Med; 2014 Feb; 30(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 22749733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
