212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18033949)
41. Niobium filtration of conventional and high-frequency x-ray generator beams for intraoral radiography. Effects on absorbed doses, image density and contrast, and photon spectra.
Tetradis S; Scaf G; Lurie AG; Freedman ML
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Aug; 80(2):232-41. PubMed ID: 7552890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Effect of tube voltage on CT noise levels in different phantom sizes.
Karmazyn B; Liang Y; Klahr P; Jennings SG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 May; 200(5):1001-5. PubMed ID: 23617481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Effect of X-ray tube parameters, iodine concentration, and patient size on image quality in pulmonary computed tomography angiography: a chest-phantom-study.
Szucs-Farkas Z; Verdun FR; von Allmen G; Mini RL; Vock P
Invest Radiol; 2008 Jun; 43(6):374-81. PubMed ID: 18496042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Absorbed doses from intraoral radiography with special emphasis on collimator dimensions.
Stenström B; Henrikson CO; Holm B; Richter S
Swed Dent J; 1986; 10(1-2):59-71. PubMed ID: 3458320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 1: phantom validity.
Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 9927090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Female breast, lung, and pelvic organ radiation from dose-reduced 64-MDCT thoracic examination protocols: a phantom study.
Litmanovich D; Tack D; Lin PJ; Boiselle PM; Raptopoulos V; Bankier AA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Oct; 197(4):929-34. PubMed ID: 21940581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Is digital better in dental radiography?
Zdesar U; Fortuna T; Valantic B; Skrk D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):138-9. PubMed ID: 18375462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Dose and energy dependence of response of Gafchromic XR-QA film for kilovoltage x-ray beams.
Rampado O; Garelli E; Deagostini S; Ropolo R
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(11):2871-81. PubMed ID: 16723772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Comparison of organ dose from chest radiography with varying beam quality and constant exposure index.
Nakanishi K
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2023 Sep; 46(3):1143-1151. PubMed ID: 37245193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Reduction of absorbed doses to the thyroid gland in orthodontic treatment planning by reducing the area of irradiation.
Svenson B; Sjöholm B; Jonsson B
Swed Dent J; 2004; 28(3):137-47. PubMed ID: 15506691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Validation of a MOSFET dosemeter system for determining the absorbed and effective radiation doses in diagnostic radiology.
Manninen AL; Kotiaho A; Nikkinen J; Nieminen MT
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Apr; 164(3):361-7. PubMed ID: 25213263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Effects of radiographic techniques on the low-contrast detail detectability performance of digital radiography systems.
Alsleem H; U P; Mong KS; Davidson R
Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 25002641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Dual energy CT of the chest: how about the dose?
Schenzle JC; Sommer WH; Neumaier K; Michalski G; Lechel U; Nikolaou K; Becker CR; Reiser MF; Johnson TR
Invest Radiol; 2010 Jun; 45(6):347-53. PubMed ID: 20404737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Effective dosages for recording Veraviewepocs dental panoramic images: analog film, digital, and panoramic scout for CBCT.
Garcia Silva MA; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Gründler K; Visser H; Hirsch E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):571-7. PubMed ID: 18602314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Investigation of the practical aspects of an additional 0.1 mm copper x-ray spectral filter for cine acquisition mode imaging in a clinical care setting.
Fetterly KA
Health Phys; 2010 Nov; 99(5):624-30. PubMed ID: 20938232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography.
Huda W
Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S173-82; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 3: Conversion coefficients for reconstruction of organ doses achieved during chest X-ray examinations].
Seidenbusch MC; Regulla D; Schneider K
Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1061-81. PubMed ID: 19235700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Evaluation of two objective methods to optimize kVp and personnel exposure using a digital indirect flat panel detector and simulated veterinary patients.
Copple C; Robertson ID; Thrall DE; Samei E
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2013; 54(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 23293957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Absorbed doses at varying tube voltage in lateral cephalography.
Eliasson S; Julin P; Philip A; Stenström B
Swed Dent J; 1985; 9(3):117-27. PubMed ID: 3860993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Sensitometric response of the Sens-A-Ray, a charge-coupled imaging device, to changes in beam energy.
Goshima T; Goshima Y; Scarfe WC; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Jan; 25(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 9084280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
