These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18033949)

  • 81. Surface and internal absorbed doses in mandibular and maxillary occlusal radiography.
    Roth SF; Bohay RN; Barnett RB
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1995 Nov; 61(11):955-9. PubMed ID: 8521323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. An investigation into techniques for reducing doses from neo-natal radiographic examinations.
    Wraith CM; Martin CJ; Stockdale EJ; McDonald S; Farquhar B
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Oct; 68(814):1074-82. PubMed ID: 7496707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. A pilot study of half-value layer measurements using a semiconductor dosimeter for intraoral radiography.
    Nouchi S; Yoshida H; Miki Y; Tezuka Y; Ogawa R; Ogura I
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2023 Sep; 53(3):217-220. PubMed ID: 37799740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. [Clinical and comparative study of the image quality of 3 digital radiographic systems, E-speed film and digitalized film]].
    Bóscolo FN; de Oliveira AE; de Almeida SM; Haiter CF; Haiter Neto F
    Pesqui Odontol Bras; 2001; 15(4):327-33. PubMed ID: 11787321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Radiation absorbed doses at radiographic examination of third molars.
    Rehnmark-Larsson S; Stenström B; Julin P; Richter S
    Swed Dent J; 1982; 6(5):189-201. PubMed ID: 6960504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Influence of dose reduction recommendations on changes in chest radiography techniques.
    Warren-Forward HM; Haddaway MJ; McCall IW; Temperton DH
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Aug; 69(824):755-61. PubMed ID: 8949679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Red bone marrow doses, integral absorbed doses, and somatically effective dose equivalent from four maxillary occlusal projections.
    Berge TI; Wøhni T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Feb; 57(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 6583630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Using compensating filters to reduce radiation dose.
    Katsuda T; Okazaki M; Kuroda C
    Radiol Technol; 1996; 68(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 8880967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. A method for evaluating the entrance surface dose from the measurement of exposure and half value layer in intraoral radiography using a radiophotoluminescent dosemeter.
    Katoh T; Sasaki T; Iwai K; Okano T; Satoh K; Shimano T; Hayami A; Wada S; Juto N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 103(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 12596989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. [Dose and image quality in intraoral radiography].
    Hjardemaal O
    Tandlaegebladet; 1991 Nov; 95(16):748-51. PubMed ID: 1816648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. [Patient absorbed dose in coronary angiography determined by the flat panel digital detector X-ray system].
    Kitai T; Ogawa T; Sano S
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Mar; 59(3):423-6. PubMed ID: 12740566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Effect of cranium structure on dose distribution during intraoral radiography.
    Ishii T; Iwawaki A; Otaka Y; Nitanda A; Ochiai A; Kito S; Aboshi H; Saka H
    J Oral Biosci; 2022 Mar; 64(1):131-140. PubMed ID: 34906710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Tissue radiation dosages using the RVG-S with and without niobium filtration.
    Scarfe WC; Farman AG; Brand JW; Kelly MS
    Aust Dent J; 1997 Oct; 42(5):335-42. PubMed ID: 9409051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Comparison of two film holders for periapical radiography performed by dental students.
    Choksi SK; Rao MS
    MSDA J; 1996; 39(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 9569872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Evaluation of basic characteristics of a semiconductor detector for personal radiation dose monitoring.
    Terasaki K; Fujibuchi T; Murazaki H; Kuramoto T; Umezu Y; Ishigaki Y; Matsumoto Y
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2017 Jun; 10(2):189-194. PubMed ID: 27796808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Do CEC guidelines under-utilise the full potential of increasing kVp as a dose-reducing tool?
    Doherty P; O'Leary D; Brennan PC
    Eur Radiol; 2003 Aug; 13(8):1992-9. PubMed ID: 12942300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Diagnostic reference levels in intraoral dental radiography in Korea.
    Kim EK; Han WJ; Choi JW; Jung YH; Yoon SJ; Lee JS
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2012 Dec; 42(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 23301210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Absorbed doses with intraoral radiography. Function of various technical parameters.
    Hayakawa Y; Fujimori H; Kuroyanagi K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Oct; 76(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 8233434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Dose optimisation in paediatric radiography - Using regression models to investigate the relative impact of acquisition factors on image quality and radiation dose.
    Mohammed Ali A; Hogg P; England A
    Phys Med; 2019 Dec; 68():61-68. PubMed ID: 31751806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Ambient dose during intraoral radiography with current techniques: part 3: effect of tube voltage.
    Hoogeveen RC; van Beest D; Berkhout E
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 May; 50(4):20190362. PubMed ID: 33180551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.