These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

34 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18034085)

  • 1. Antomy of the Proximal Femur -geometry and architecture. Morphologic investigation and literature review.
    Glinkowski W; Ciszek B
    Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2002 Apr; 4(2):200-8. PubMed ID: 18034085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Proximal strain distribution in the loaded femur. An in vitro comparison of the distributions in the intact femur and after insertion of different hip-replacement femoral components.
    Oh I; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1978 Jan; 60(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 624762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of the calcar femorale in stress distribution in the proximal femur.
    Zhang Q; Chen W; Liu HJ; Li ZY; Song ZH; Pan JS; Zhang YZ
    Orthop Surg; 2009 Nov; 1(4):311-6. PubMed ID: 22009881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The topographic and comparative study of the calcar femorale.
    Glinkowski W; Ciszek B
    Folia Morphol (Warsz); 1989; 48(1-4):183-91. PubMed ID: 2485779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Internal architecture of the proximal femur: calcar femorale or Adams' arch?
    Bartoníček J; Alt J; Naňka O
    Int Orthop; 2023 Jul; 47(7):1871-1877. PubMed ID: 36928707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The calcar femorale. An anatomic, radiologic, and surgical correlative study.
    Stiles RG; Laverina CJ; Resnick D; Convery FR
    Invest Radiol; 1990 Dec; 25(12):1311-5. PubMed ID: 2279911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Strategies for managing the destruction of calcar femorale.
    Mei J; Pang L; Jiang Z
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 May; 22(1):460. PubMed ID: 34011332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The calcar femorale: A new perspective.
    Hammer A
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2019; 27(2):2309499019848778. PubMed ID: 31117884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Anatomically adapted endoprosthesis of the proximal end of the femur].
    Henssge EJ; Grundei H; Etspüler R; Köller W; Fink K
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1985; 123(5):821-8. PubMed ID: 4082741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of proximal femoral geometry using digital photographs.
    Unnanuntana A; Toogood P; Hart D; Cooperman D; Grant RE
    J Orthop Res; 2010 Nov; 28(11):1399-404. PubMed ID: 20872573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparative periprosthetic bone density measurements of the proximal femur shaft using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) with experimental "Press Fit-gliding Stem Prosthesis"].
    Krüger A; Berli B; Lampert C; Kränzlin C; Morscher E
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1998; 136(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 9615973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-assisted three-dimensional correlation between the femoral neck-shaft angle and the optimal entry point for antegrade nailing.
    Anastopoulos G; Chissas D; Dourountakis J; Ntagiopoulos PG; Magnisalis E; Asimakopoulos A; Xenakis TA
    Injury; 2010 Mar; 41(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 20176170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The calcar femorale: a tale of historical neglect.
    Newell RL
    Clin Anat; 1997; 10(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 8986385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Histo-anatomy of the proximal femur in rats: impact of ovariectomy on bone mass, structure, and stiffness.
    Bagi CM; DeLeon E; Ammann P; Rizzoli R; Miller SC
    Anat Rec; 1996 Aug; 245(4):633-44. PubMed ID: 8837721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The calcar femorale redefined.
    Griffin JB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1982 Apr; (164):211-4. PubMed ID: 7067289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The reconstruction of three-dimension morphology of proximal femur].
    Wang W; Wang Y; Cui J; Han G
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Oct; 41(10):744-8. PubMed ID: 14766046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variation of trabecular architecture in proximal femur of postmenopausal women.
    Ascenzi MG; Hetzer N; Lomovtsev A; Rude R; Nattiv A; Favia A
    J Biomech; 2011 Jan; 44(2):248-56. PubMed ID: 21055755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of varus and valgus osteotomies on femoral version.
    Liu RW; Toogood P; Hart DE; Davy DT; Cooperman DR
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2009; 29(7):666-75. PubMed ID: 20104143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sex-specific developmental changes in muscle size and bone geometry at the femoral shaft.
    Högler W; Blimkie CJ; Cowell CT; Inglis D; Rauch F; Kemp AF; Wiebe P; Duncan CS; Farpour-Lambert N; Woodhead HJ
    Bone; 2008 May; 42(5):982-9. PubMed ID: 18337201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.