627 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18034758)
21. Factors associated with the acceptance of sugar and sugar substitutes by the public.
Mackay DA
Int Dent J; 1985 Sep; 35(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 3902661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Liking and exposure: first, second and tenth time around.
Frøst MB
Physiol Behav; 2006 Aug; 89(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 16574169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Temporal sweetness and side tastes profiles of 16 sweeteners using temporal check-all-that-apply (TCATA).
Tan VWK; Wee MSM; Tomic O; Forde CG
Food Res Int; 2019 Jul; 121():39-47. PubMed ID: 31108762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Decreasing dislike for sour and bitter in children and adults.
Capaldi ED; Privitera GJ
Appetite; 2008 Jan; 50(1):139-45. PubMed ID: 17655971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Artificial sweeteners, caffeine, and alcohol intoxication in bar patrons.
Rossheim ME; Thombs DL
Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2011 Oct; 35(10):1891-6. PubMed ID: 21554335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Intense sweetness surpasses cocaine reward.
Lenoir M; Serre F; Cantin L; Ahmed SH
PLoS One; 2007 Aug; 2(8):e698. PubMed ID: 17668074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Phenol-Rich Food Acceptability: The Influence of Variations in Sweetness Optima and Sensory-Liking Patterns.
Spinelli S; Prescott J; Pierguidi L; Dinnella C; Arena E; Braghieri A; Di Monaco R; Gallina Toschi T; Endrizzi I; Proserpio C; Torri L; Monteleone E
Nutrients; 2021 Mar; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 33800789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Human hedonic responses to sweetness: role of taste genetics and anatomy.
Yeomans MR; Tepper BJ; Rietzschel J; Prescott J
Physiol Behav; 2007 Jun; 91(2-3):264-73. PubMed ID: 17477942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Influence of Package Visual Cues of Sweeteners on the Sensory-Emotional Profiles of Their Products.
Wardy W; Chonpracha P; Chokumnoyporn N; Sriwattana S; Prinyawiwatkul W; Jirangrat W
J Food Sci; 2017 Feb; 82(2):500-508. PubMed ID: 28071796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Additive effects of flavour-caffeine and flavour-flavour pairings on liking for the smell and flavour of a novel drink.
Yeomans MR; Mobini S; Chambers L
Physiol Behav; 2007 Dec; 92(5):831-9. PubMed ID: 17675193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reduced dietary intake of simple sugars alters perceived sweet taste intensity but not perceived pleasantness.
Wise PM; Nattress L; Flammer LJ; Beauchamp GK
Am J Clin Nutr; 2016 Jan; 103(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 26607941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A Comparison of Psychophysical Dose-Response Behaviour across 16 Sweeteners.
Wee M; Tan V; Forde C
Nutrients; 2018 Nov; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 30400167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Increasing caloric contribution from sugar-sweetened beverages and 100% fruit juices among US children and adolescents, 1988-2004.
Wang YC; Bleich SN; Gortmaker SL
Pediatrics; 2008 Jun; 121(6):e1604-14. PubMed ID: 18519465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Bitter taste markers explain variability in vegetable sweetness, bitterness, and intake.
Dinehart ME; Hayes JE; Bartoshuk LM; Lanier SL; Duffy VB
Physiol Behav; 2006 Feb; 87(2):304-13. PubMed ID: 16368118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Identification of sensory attributes that drive consumer liking of commercial orange juice products in Korea.
Kim MK; Lee YJ; Kwak HS; Kang MW
J Food Sci; 2013 Sep; 78(9):S1451-8. PubMed ID: 23909609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Users of 'diet' drinks who think that sweetness is calories.
Freeman RP; Booth DA
Appetite; 2010 Aug; 55(1):152-5. PubMed ID: 20412825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Influence of repeated consumption of beverages containing sucrose or intense sweeteners on food intake.
Van Wymelbeke V; Béridot-Thérond ME; de La Guéronnière V; Fantino M
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2004 Jan; 58(1):154-61. PubMed ID: 14679381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Potential intake of intense sweeteners in Brazil.
Toledo MC; Ioshi SH
Food Addit Contam; 1995; 12(6):799-808. PubMed ID: 8608854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Rate-All-That-Apply (RATA) comparison of taste profiles for different sweeteners in black tea, chocolate milk, and natural yogurt.
Tan VWK; Wee MSM; Tomic O; Forde CG
J Food Sci; 2020 Feb; 85(2):486-492. PubMed ID: 31968393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. An assessment of liking for sugars using the estimated daily intake scale.
Privitera GJ; Wallace M
Appetite; 2011 Jun; 56(3):713-8. PubMed ID: 21333701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
