These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18034797)

  • 1. Identifying the factors that determine feedback given to undergraduate medical students following formative mini-CEX assessments.
    Fernando N; Cleland J; McKenzie H; Cassar K
    Med Educ; 2008 Jan; 42(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 18034797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Undergraduate medical students: who seeks formative feedback?
    Sinclair HK; Cleland JA
    Med Educ; 2007 Jun; 41(6):580-2. PubMed ID: 17518838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring the influence of gender, seniority and specialty on paper and computer-based feedback provision during mini-CEX assessments in a busy emergency department.
    Chang YC; Lee CH; Chen CK; Liao CH; Ng CJ; Chen JC; Chaou CH
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2017 Mar; 22(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 27112960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does feedback matter? Practice-based learning for medical students after a multi-institutional clinical performance examination.
    Srinivasan M; Hauer KE; Der-Martirosian C; Wilkes M; Gesundheit N
    Med Educ; 2007 Sep; 41(9):857-65. PubMed ID: 17727526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence for the acceptability and academic success of an innovative remote and rural extended placement.
    Wilson M; Cleland J
    Rural Remote Health; 2008; 8(3):960. PubMed ID: 18847300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examining the nature of feedback within the Mini Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX): an analysis of 1427 Mini-CEX assessment forms.
    Soemantri D; Dodds A; Mccoll G
    GMS J Med Educ; 2018; 35(4):Doc47. PubMed ID: 30539072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer-assisted learning: a novel approach to clinical skills learning for medical students.
    Field M; Burke JM; McAllister D; Lloyd DM
    Med Educ; 2007 Apr; 41(4):411-8. PubMed ID: 17430287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Internal medicine residents' perceptions of the Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise.
    Malhotra S; Hatala R; Courneya CA
    Med Teach; 2008; 30(4):414-9. PubMed ID: 18569664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In-training assessment: qualitative study of effects on supervision and feedback in an undergraduate clinical rotation.
    Daelmans HE; Overmeer RM; van der Hem-Stokroos HH; Scherpbier AJ; Stehouwer CD; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Educ; 2006 Jan; 40(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 16441323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Educational impact of an assessment of medical students' collaboration in health care teams.
    Olupeliyawa A; Balasooriya C; Hughes C; O'Sullivan A
    Med Educ; 2014 Feb; 48(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 24528397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence for validity within workplace assessment: the Longitudinal Evaluation of Performance (LEP).
    Prescott-Clements L; van der Vleuten CP; Schuwirth LW; Hurst Y; Rennie JS
    Med Educ; 2008 May; 42(5):488-95. PubMed ID: 18298449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Workplace-based assessments of junior doctors: do scores predict training difficulties?
    Mitchell C; Bhat S; Herbert A; Baker P
    Med Educ; 2011 Dec; 45(12):1190-8. PubMed ID: 21995509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cohort study on predicting grades: is performance on early MBChB assessments predictive of later undergraduate grades?
    Cleland JA; Milne A; Sinclair H; Lee AJ
    Med Educ; 2008 Jul; 42(7):676-83. PubMed ID: 18588648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feasibility, reliability and user satisfaction with a PDA-based mini-CEX to evaluate the clinical skills of third-year medical students.
    Torre DM; Simpson DE; Elnicki DM; Sebastian JL; Holmboe ES
    Teach Learn Med; 2007; 19(3):271-7. PubMed ID: 17594223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Formative feedback to students: the mismatch between faculty perceptions and student expectations.
    Perera J; Lee N; Win K; Perera J; Wijesuriya L
    Med Teach; 2008; 30(4):395-9. PubMed ID: 18569661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Introduction of Mini-CEX in undergraduate dental education in India.
    Behere R
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2014; 27(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 25758390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving the accuracy of self-assessment of practical clinical skills using video feedback--the importance of including benchmarks.
    Hawkins SC; Osborne A; Schofield SJ; Pournaras DJ; Chester JF
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(4):279-84. PubMed ID: 22455696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of two methods of teaching reflective ability in Year 3 medical students.
    Aronson L; Niehaus B; Hill-Sakurai L; Lai C; O'Sullivan PS
    Med Educ; 2012 Aug; 46(8):807-14. PubMed ID: 22803758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Compliance of medical students with voluntary use of personal data assistants for clerkship assessments.
    Norman G; Keane D; Oppenheimer L
    Teach Learn Med; 2008; 20(4):295-301. PubMed ID: 18855232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pilot study of a 'RIME'-based tool for giving feedback in a multi-specialty longitudinal clerkship.
    DeWitt D; Carline J; Paauw D; Pangaro L
    Med Educ; 2008 Dec; 42(12):1205-9. PubMed ID: 19120951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.