These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

443 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18035071)

  • 1. Rationale and design of a prospective study of the efficacy of a remote monitoring system used in implantable cardioverter defibrillator follow-up: the Lumos-T Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-Up Study (TRUST) study.
    Varma N
    Am Heart J; 2007 Dec; 154(6):1029-34. PubMed ID: 18035071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead and generator performance: the Lumos-T Safely RedUceS RouTine Office Device Follow-Up (TRUST) trial.
    Varma N; Michalski J; Epstein AE; Schweikert R
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2010 Oct; 3(5):428-36. PubMed ID: 20716717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy and safety of automatic remote monitoring for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator follow-up: the Lumos-T Safely Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-up (TRUST) trial.
    Varma N; Epstein AE; Irimpen A; Schweikert R; Love C;
    Circulation; 2010 Jul; 122(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 20625110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Potential role of remote monitoring for scheduled and unscheduled evaluations of patients with an implantable defibrillator.
    Heidbüchel H; Lioen P; Foulon S; Huybrechts W; Ector J; Willems R; Ector H
    Europace; 2008 Mar; 10(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 18245771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Potential role of home monitoring to reduce inappropriate shocks in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients due to lead failure.
    Spencker S; Coban N; Koch L; Schirdewan A; Müller D
    Europace; 2009 Apr; 11(4):483-8. PubMed ID: 19103654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trial design of the clinical evaluation of remote notification to reduce time to clinical decision: the Clinical evaluation Of remote NotificatioN to rEduCe Time to clinical decision (CONNECT) study.
    Crossley G; Boyle A; Vitense H; Sherfesee L; Mead RH
    Am Heart J; 2008 Nov; 156(5):840-6. PubMed ID: 19061696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Remote, wireless, ambulatory monitoring of implantable pacemakers, cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy systems: analysis of a worldwide database.
    Lazarus A
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Jan; 30 Suppl 1():S2-S12. PubMed ID: 17302706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Role of Automatic Wireless Remote Monitoring Immediately Following ICD Implant: The Lumos-T Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-Up Study (TRUST) Trial.
    Varma N; Epstein AE; Schweikert R; Michalski J; Love CJ;
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):321-6. PubMed ID: 26661687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators versus quarterly device interrogations in clinic: results from a randomized pilot clinical trial.
    Al-Khatib SM; Piccini JP; Knight D; Stewart M; Clapp-Channing N; Sanders GD
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2010 May; 21(5):545-50. PubMed ID: 20021522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automatic home monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators.
    Nielsen JC; Kottkamp H; Zabel M; Aliot E; Kreutzer U; Bauer A; Schuchert A; Neuser H; Schumacher B; Schmidinger H; Stix G; Clémenty J; Danilovic D; Hindricks G
    Europace; 2008 Jun; 10(6):729-35. PubMed ID: 18434298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a prospective analysis.
    Schoenfeld MH; Compton SJ; Mead RH; Weiss DN; Sherfesee L; Englund J; Mongeon LR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Jun; 27(6 Pt 1):757-63. PubMed ID: 15189530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Follow-up of CRT-ICD: implications for the use of remote follow-up systems. Data from the InSync ICD Italian Registry.
    Lunati M; Gasparini M; Santini M; Landolina M; Perego GB; Pappone C; Marzegalli M; Argiolas C; Murthy A; Valsecchi S;
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Jan; 31(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 18181908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Technical and practical aspects of remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients in Poland - preliminary results.
    Przybylski A; Zakrzewska-Koperska J; Maciag A; Derejko P; Orczykowski M; Szumowski L; Walczak F
    Kardiol Pol; 2009 May; 67(5):505-11. PubMed ID: 19521935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multicenter randomized study of anticoagulation guided by remote rhythm monitoring in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and CRT-D devices: Rationale, design, and clinical characteristics of the initially enrolled cohort The IMPACT study.
    Ip J; Waldo AL; Lip GY; Rothwell PM; Martin DT; Bersohn MM; Choucair WK; Akar JG; Wathen MS; Rohani P; Halperin JL;
    Am Heart J; 2009 Sep; 158(3):364-370.e1. PubMed ID: 19699858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Home monitoring remote control of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients in clinical practice: impact on medical management and health-care resource utilization.
    Ricci RP; Morichelli L; Santini M
    Europace; 2008 Feb; 10(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 18199570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The MOnitoring Resynchronization dEvices and CARdiac patiEnts (MORE-CARE) study: rationale and design.
    Burri H; Quesada A; Ricci RP; Boriani G; Davinelli M; Favale S; Da Costa A; Kautzner J; Moser R; Navarro X; Santini M
    Am Heart J; 2010 Jul; 160(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 20598971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical benefits of remote versus transtelephonic monitoring of implanted pacemakers.
    Crossley GH; Chen J; Choucair W; Cohen TJ; Gohn DC; Johnson WB; Kennedy EE; Mongeon LR; Serwer GA; Qiao H; Wilkoff BL;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Nov; 54(22):2012-9. PubMed ID: 19926006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Potential cost savings by telemedicine-assisted long-term care of implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients.
    Fauchier L; Sadoul N; Kouakam C; Briand F; Chauvin M; Babuty D; Clementy J
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Jan; 28 Suppl 1():S255-9. PubMed ID: 15683509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Remote implantable cardioverter defibrillator monitoring in a Brugada syndrome population.
    Sacher F; Probst V; Bessouet M; Wright M; Maluski A; Abbey S; Bordachar P; Deplagne A; Ploux S; Lande G; Jaïs P; Hocini M; Haïssaguerre M; Le Marec H; Clémenty J
    Europace; 2009 Apr; 11(4):489-94. PubMed ID: 19218576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Remote Active Monitoring in Patients with Heart Failure (RAPID-RF): design and rationale.
    Saxon LA; Boehmer JP; Neuman S; Mullin CM
    J Card Fail; 2007 May; 13(4):241-6. PubMed ID: 17517341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.