These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

442 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18035071)

  • 41. Early event detection using a home monitoring system for patients with cardiac pacemakers.
    Tang J; Chen S
    Aging Clin Exp Res; 2014 Apr; 26(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 24122156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial to assess the role of overdrive and triggered prevention pacing therapies in reducing atrial fibrillation: the Study of Atrial Fibrillation Reduction (SAFARI).
    Gold MR; Hoffmann E;
    Am Heart J; 2006 Aug; 152(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 16875902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The benefits of remote monitoring in long-term care for patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.
    Ošmera O; Bulava A
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2014; 35 Suppl 1():40-8. PubMed ID: 25433353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Use of an intracardiac electrogram eliminates the need for a surface ECG during implantable cardioverter-defibrillator follow-up.
    Michael KA; Peterson BJ; Yue AM; Wilson RD; Wang L; Ousdigian K; Wilkoff B; Sterns L; Morgan JM;
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Dec; 30(12):1432-7. PubMed ID: 18070295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Remote monitoring and follow up of implantable cardioverter defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices].
    Guevara-Valdivia ME; Echegaray-Trelles A; Hernández J; Cordero-Pérez Lde J; Valderrama de-León R; Santos MA; Huarte-Hernández Y
    Arch Cardiol Mex; 2011; 81(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 21775242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Work burden with remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillator: is it time for reimbursement policies?
    Papavasileiou LP; Forleo GB; Panattoni G; Schirripa V; Minni V; Magliano G; Bellos K; Santini L; Romeo F
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2013 Feb; 14(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 22644407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Home monitoring system improves the detection of ventricular arrhythmia and inappropriate shock.
    Wang H; Hua W; Ding LG; Wang J; Chen KP; Zhang S
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Oct; 125(19):3421-4. PubMed ID: 23044299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Patient alert in implantable cardioverter defibrillators: toy or tool?
    Becker R; Ruf-Richter J; Senges-Becker JC; Bauer A; Weretka S; Voss F; Katus HA; Schoels W
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Jul; 44(1):95-8. PubMed ID: 15234415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Outcome after implantation of cardioverter defibrillator [corrected] in patients with Brugada syndrome: a multicenter Israeli study (ISRABRU).
    Rosso R; Glick A; Glikson M; Wagshal A; Swissa M; Rosenhek S; Shetboun I; Khalamizer V; Fuchs T; Boulos M; Geist M; Strasberg B; Ilan M; Belhassen B;
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2008 Jun; 10(6):435-9. PubMed ID: 18669142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Early automatic remote detection of combined lead insulation defect and ICD damage.
    Neuzil P; Taborsky M; Holy F; Wallbrueck K
    Europace; 2008 May; 10(5):556-7. PubMed ID: 18227352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Home monitoring in patients with implantable cardiac devices: is there a potential reduction of stroke risk? Results from a computer model tested through monte carlo simulations.
    Ricci RP; Morichelli L; Gargaro A; Laudadio MT; Santini M
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1244-51. PubMed ID: 19602024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Strategic programming of detection and therapy parameters in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators reduces shocks in primary prevention patients: results from the PREPARE (Primary Prevention Parameters Evaluation) study.
    Wilkoff BL; Williamson BD; Stern RS; Moore SL; Lu F; Lee SW; Birgersdotter-Green UM; Wathen MS; Van Gelder IC; Heubner BM; Brown ML; Holloman KK;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Aug; 52(7):541-50. PubMed ID: 18687248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Use of a wireless implantable cardioverter defibrillator in a patient with a preexisting neurostimulator.
    Katwal AB; McCotter CJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Jun; 32(6):822-4. PubMed ID: 19545350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Day by day telemetric care of patients treated with cardiac resynchronisation therapy: first Polish experience.
    Liberska A; Kowalski O; Mazurek M; Lenarczyk R; Jędrzejczyk-Patej E; Przybylska-Siedlecka K; Kozieł M; Morawski S; Podolecki T; Kowalczyk J; Pruszkowska P; Pluta S; Sokal A; Kalarus Z
    Kardiol Pol; 2016; 74(8):741-748. PubMed ID: 26898970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [New implantable devices for patient management: role and perspectives of remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators].
    Locati ET; Vargiu S; Mulargia E; Ardito C; Schirru M; Pedretti S; Negrini F; Lunati M
    G Ital Cardiol (Rome); 2012 Oct; 13(10 Suppl 2):36S-40S. PubMed ID: 23096373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Should recent defibrillator and lead advisories affect decisions to refer patients for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy?
    Amin MS; Ellenbogen KA
    Curr Opin Cardiol; 2010 Jan; 25(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 19907318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Downloadable algorithm to reduce inappropriate shocks caused by fractures of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads.
    Swerdlow CD; Gunderson BD; Ousdigian KT; Abeyratne A; Stadler RW; Gillberg JM; Patel AS; Ellenbogen KA
    Circulation; 2008 Nov; 118(21):2122-9. PubMed ID: 18981299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [The utility of remote monitoring in the follow-up of patients with cardiac rhythm management devices].
    Mäkelä T; Uusimaa P; Koivisto UM; Raatikainen P
    Duodecim; 2009; 125(19):2059-65. PubMed ID: 19938409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Remote monitoring: Doomed to let down or an attractive promise?
    Lucà F; Cipolletta L; Di Fusco SA; Iorio A; Pozzi A; Rao CM; Ingianni N; Benvenuto M; Madeo A; Fiscella D; Benedetto D; Francese GM; Gelsomino S; Zecchin M; Gabrielli D; Gulizia MM
    Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc; 2019 Sep; 24():100380. PubMed ID: 31193998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The CONNECT (Clinical Evaluation of Remote Notification to Reduce Time to Clinical Decision) trial: the value of wireless remote monitoring with automatic clinician alerts.
    Crossley GH; Boyle A; Vitense H; Chang Y; Mead RH;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Mar; 57(10):1181-9. PubMed ID: 21255955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.