BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18035281)

  • 1. Hepatic enhancement in colorectal cancer: texture analysis correlates with hepatic hemodynamics and patient survival.
    Ganeshan B; Miles KA; Young RC; Chatwin CR
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Dec; 14(12):1520-30. PubMed ID: 18035281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Texture analysis in non-contrast enhanced CT: impact of malignancy on texture in apparently disease-free areas of the liver.
    Ganeshan B; Miles KA; Young RC; Chatwin CR
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 18242909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In search of biologic correlates for liver texture on portal-phase CT.
    Ganeshan B; Miles KA; Young RC; Chatwin CR
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Sep; 14(9):1058-68. PubMed ID: 17707313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Colorectal cancer: texture analysis of portal phase hepatic CT images as a potential marker of survival.
    Miles KA; Ganeshan B; Griffiths MR; Young RC; Chatwin CR
    Radiology; 2009 Feb; 250(2):444-52. PubMed ID: 19164695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CT textural analysis of hepatic metastatic colorectal cancer: pre-treatment tumor heterogeneity correlates with pathology and clinical outcomes.
    Lubner MG; Stabo N; Lubner SJ; del Rio AM; Song C; Halberg RB; Pickhardt PJ
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Oct; 40(7):2331-7. PubMed ID: 25968046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multi-detector row helical CT of the liver: quantitative assessment of iodine concentration of intravenous contrast material on multiphasic CT--a prospective randomized study.
    Tsurusaki M; Sugimoto K; Fujii M; Sugimura K
    Radiat Med; 2004; 22(4):239-45. PubMed ID: 15468944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Timing of parenchymal enhancement on dual-phase dynamic helical CT of the liver: how long does the hepatic arterial phase predominate?
    Frederick MG; McElaney BL; Singer A; Park KS; Paulson EK; McGee SG; Nelson RC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jun; 166(6):1305-10. PubMed ID: 8633437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hepatic metastasis detection: comparison of three CT contrast enhancement methods.
    Miller DL; Simmons JT; Chang R; Ward BA; Shawker TH; Doppman JL; Chang AE
    Radiology; 1987 Dec; 165(3):785-90. PubMed ID: 3685361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Helical CT of the liver: value of an early hepatic arterial phase.
    Bonaldi VM; Bret PM; Reinhold C; Atri M
    Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):357-63. PubMed ID: 7480677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization of Portal Vein Thrombosis (Neoplastic Versus Bland) on CT Images Using Software-Based Texture Analysis and Thrombus Density (Hounsfield Units).
    Canellas R; Mehrkhani F; Patino M; Kambadakone A; Sahani D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Nov; 207(5):W81-W87. PubMed ID: 27490095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of 2 contrast materials with different iodine concentrations in 3-dimensional computed tomography angiography of the hepatic artery at multi-detector-row computed tomography: a randomized study.
    Suzuki H; Shibamoto Y; Oshima H; Takeuchi M; Ito M; Hara M
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(6):840-5. PubMed ID: 18043345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frequency Selective Non-Linear Blending to Improve Image Quality in Liver CT.
    Bongers MN; Bier G; Kloth C; Schabel C; Fritz J; Nikolaou K; Horger M
    Rofo; 2016 Dec; 188(12):1163-1168. PubMed ID: 27907941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hepatic enhancement in multiphasic contrast-enhanced MDCT: comparison of high- and low-iodine-concentration contrast medium in same patients with chronic liver disease.
    Furuta A; Ito K; Fujita T; Koike S; Shimizu A; Matsunaga N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Jul; 183(1):157-62. PubMed ID: 15208131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-small cell lung cancer: histopathologic correlates for texture parameters at CT.
    Ganeshan B; Goh V; Mandeville HC; Ng QS; Hoskin PJ; Miles KA
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):326-36. PubMed ID: 23169792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the hepatic perfusion index measured with gadolinium-enhanced volumetric MRI in controls and in patients with colorectal cancer.
    Totman JJ; O'gorman RL; Kane PA; Karani JB
    Br J Radiol; 2005 Feb; 78(926):105-9. PubMed ID: 15681320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hemodynamic and morphologic changes after portal vein embolization: differential effects in central and peripheral zones in the liver on multiphasic computed tomography.
    Kobayashi S; Ng CS; Kazama T; Madoff DC; Faria SC; Vauthey JN; Charnsangavej C
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2004; 28(6):804-10. PubMed ID: 15538155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of injection rates of contrast material on arterial phase hepatic CT.
    Kim T; Murakami T; Takahashi S; Tsuda K; Tomoda K; Narumi Y; Oi H; Nakamura H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Aug; 171(2):429-32. PubMed ID: 9694469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hepatic transit time analysis using contrast-enhanced ultrasound with BR1: A prospective study comparing patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer with healthy volunteers.
    Hohmann J; Müller C; Oldenburg A; Skrok J; Frericks BB; Wolf KJ; Albrecht T
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1427-35. PubMed ID: 19540656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of saline pushing after contrast material injection in abdominal multidetector computed tomography with the use of different iodine concentrations.
    Tatsugami F; Matsuki M; Kani H; Tanikake M; Miyao M; Yoshikawa S; Narabayashi I
    Acta Radiol; 2006 Mar; 47(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 16604967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Timing of the hepatic arterial phase during contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the liver: assessment of normal values in 25 volunteers.
    Bader TR; Prokesch RW; Grabenwöger F
    Invest Radiol; 2000 Aug; 35(8):486-92. PubMed ID: 10946976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.