673 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18035405)
1. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study.
Kim YT; Kim SW; Hyung WJ; Lee SJ; Nam EJ; Lee WJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Feb; 108(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 18035405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type II-III) with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer.
Gil-Moreno A; Puig O; Pérez-Benavente MA; Díaz B; Vergés R; De la Torre J; Martínez-Palones JM; Xercavins J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15904613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using harmonic shears.
Nezhat F; Mahdavi A; Nagarsheth NP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 16431319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.
Ramirez PT; Slomovitz BM; Soliman PT; Coleman RL; Levenback C
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Aug; 102(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 16472844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with Ib1 stage cervical cancer: analysis of surgical and oncological outcome.
Pellegrino A; Vizza E; Fruscio R; Villa A; Corrado G; Villa M; Dell'Anna T; Vitobello D
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 35(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 18760562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
Estape R; Lambrou N; Diaz R; Estape E; Dunkin N; Rivera A
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 113(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 19345987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vaginal robot-assisted radical hysterectomy (VRARH) after laparoscopic staging: feasibility and operative results.
Oleszczuk A; Köhler C; Paulick J; Schneider A; Lanowska M
Int J Med Robot; 2009 Mar; 5(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 19153971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study.
Tinelli R; Malzoni M; Cosentino F; Perone C; Fusco A; Cicinelli E; Nezhat F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Sep; 18(9):2622-8. PubMed ID: 21394663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now?
Sert B; Abeler V
Int J Med Robot; 2007 Sep; 3(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 17924449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Safety and feasibility of robotic radical trachelectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Ramirez PT; Schmeler KM; Malpica A; Soliman PT
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Mar; 116(3):512-5. PubMed ID: 19944451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility, morbidity, and safety of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: our experience.
Malzoni M; Tinelli R; Cosentino F; Perone C; Vicario V
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(5):584-90. PubMed ID: 17848319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic radical hysterectomy: Technical aspects.
Magrina JF; Kho R; Magtibay PM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 19176237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a prospective analysis of 295 patients.
Chen Y; Xu H; Li Y; Wang D; Li J; Yuan J; Liang Z
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2847-55. PubMed ID: 18649105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sentinel lymph node identification and radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in early stage cervical cancer: laparoscopy versus laparotomy.
Díaz-Feijoo B; Gil-Moreno A; Pérez-Benavente MA; Morchón S; Martínez-Palones JM; Xercavins J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):531-7. PubMed ID: 18657483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our experience.
Malzoni M; Tinelli R; Cosentino F; Fusco A; Malzoni C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 16(5):1316-23. PubMed ID: 19224286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib-IIa cervical cancer.
Li G; Yan X; Shang H; Wang G; Chen L; Han Y
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Apr; 105(1):176-80. PubMed ID: 17197013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in early stage cervical cancer.
Pellegrino A; Villa A; Fruscio R; Signorelli M; Meroni MG; Iedà N; Vitobello D
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2008 Oct; 18(5):474-8. PubMed ID: 18936669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
