672 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18035405)
21. Less radical surgery than radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: a pilot study.
Pluta M; Rob L; Charvat M; Chmel R; Halaska M; Skapa P; Robova H
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 19264352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Laparoscopic surgical staging in cervical cancer--preliminary experience among Chinese.
Chu KK; Chang SD; Chen FP; Soong YK
Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Jan; 64(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 8995546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
Magrina JF; Kho RM; Weaver AL; Montero RP; Magtibay PM
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Apr; 109(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 18279944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Combined laparoscopic and vaginal radical surgery in cervical cancer.
Renaud MC; Plante M; Roy M
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Oct; 79(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 11006032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Clinical evaluation of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with cervical cancer].
Liang ZQ; Xu HC; Xiong GW; Li YY; Chen Y; Wang L; Chang Q; Shi CX
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Jul; 38(7):409-11. PubMed ID: 12921551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy: our early experience.
Vasilescu C; Sgarbură O; Tudor S; Popa M; Turcanu A; Florescu A; Herlea V; Anghel R
Chirurgia (Bucur); 2009; 104(4):393-7. PubMed ID: 19886045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical-pathologic and morbidity analyses of Types 2 and 3 abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Pikaart DP; Holloway RW; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ; Bigsby GE; Ortiz BH; Denardis SA
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Nov; 107(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 17692367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.
DeNardis SA; Holloway RW; Bigsby GE; Pikaart DP; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):412-7. PubMed ID: 18834620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution.
Ko EM; Muto MG; Berkowitz RS; Feltmate CM
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 18929400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: Analysis of surgical performance.
Holloway RW; Ahmad S; DeNardis SA; Peterson LB; Sultana N; Bigsby GE; Pikaart DP; Finkler NJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Dec; 115(3):447-52. PubMed ID: 19765807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our instruments and technique.
Malzoni M; Tinelli R; Cosentino F; Perone C; Iuzzolino D; Rasile M; Tinelli A
Surg Oncol; 2009 Dec; 18(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 18805001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: extraperitoneal versus laparoscopic approach.
Larciprete G; Casalino B; Segatore MF; Jarvis S; Catarinella V; Cirese E
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Jun; 126(2):259-63. PubMed ID: 16359771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: laparotomy extraperitoneal, transperitoneal or laparoscopic approach? A randomized study.
Panici PB; Plotti F; Zullo MA; Muzii L; Manci N; Palaia I; Ruggiero A; Angioli R
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Dec; 103(3):859-64. PubMed ID: 16806442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Tailoring the parametrectomy in stages IA2-IB1 cervical carcinoma: is it feasible and safe?
Panici PB; Angioli R; Palaia I; Muzii L; Zullo MA; Manci N; Rabitti C
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Mar; 96(3):792-8. PubMed ID: 15721427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy by the Pune technique: our experience of 248 cases.
Puntambekar SP; Palep RJ; Puntambekar SS; Wagh GN; Patil AM; Rayate NV; Agarwal GA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):682-9. PubMed ID: 17980327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Steed H; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; De Petrillo D; Covens A
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jun; 93(3):588-93. PubMed ID: 15196849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Can laparoscopic radical hysterectomy be a standard surgical modality in stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer?
Hong JH; Choi JS; Lee JH; Eom JM; Ko JH; Bae JW; Park SH
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Oct; 127(1):102-6. PubMed ID: 22683586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Analysis of postoperative complications of radical hysterectomy for 219 cervical cancer patients].
Wu K; Zhang WH; Zhang R; Li H; Bai P; Li XG
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 28(4):316-9. PubMed ID: 16875638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy using pulsed bipolar system: comparison with conventional bipolar electrosurgery.
Lee CL; Huang KG; Wang CJ; Lee PS; Hwang LL
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jun; 105(3):620-4. PubMed ID: 17303226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
