These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18037224)

  • 1. Accidental shock to rescuer during successful defibrillation of ventricular fibrillation--a case of human involuntary automaticity.
    Dickinson CL; Hall CR; Soar J
    Resuscitation; 2008 Mar; 76(3):489. PubMed ID: 18037224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Defibrillation-Safety versus efficacy.
    Perkins GD; Lockey AS
    Resuscitation; 2008 Oct; 79(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 18692290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Images in cardiovascular medicine. "Shock advised": inappropriate public access defibrillation.
    Nanthakumar K; Toal SC
    Circulation; 2006 Apr; 113(13):e672. PubMed ID: 16585397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Defibrillation probability and impedance change between shocks during resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
    Walker RG; Koster RW; Sun C; Moffat G; Barger J; Dodson PP; Chapman FW
    Resuscitation; 2009 Jul; 80(7):773-7. PubMed ID: 19423211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biphasic external defibrillation for adults in ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia.
    Finamore S; Turris SA
    J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2008; 23(4):326-9; quiz 330-1. PubMed ID: 18596494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved electrodes for electrical defibrillation of rats.
    Ordodi VL; Paunescu V; Mischie S; Ignea A; Toma O; Ionac M; Mic AA; Sandesc D; Mic FA
    J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci; 2006 Nov; 45(6):54-7. PubMed ID: 17089993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accidental shock to rescuer from an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.
    Siniorakis E; Hardavella G; Arvanitakis S; Roulia G; Voutas P; Karidis C
    Resuscitation; 2009 Mar; 80(3):293-4. PubMed ID: 19111958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of neurological outcomes following witnessed out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation defibrillated with either biphasic or monophasic automated external defibrillators.
    Kajino K; Iwami T; Berg RA; Hiraide A; Hayashi Y; Yukioka H; Tanaka H; Shimazu T; Sugimoto H
    Emerg Med J; 2009 Jul; 26(7):492-6. PubMed ID: 19546269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Early defibrillation: where are we?].
    Trappe HJ
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2005 Mar; 130(12):685-8. PubMed ID: 15776352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The threshold of synchronous response of the myocardial fibers. Application to the experimental comparison of the efficacy of different forms of electroshock defibrillation].
    Fabiato A; Coumel P; Gourgon R; Saumont R
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1967 Apr; 60(4):527-44. PubMed ID: 4964651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of efficacy of pulsed biphasic waveform and rectilinear biphasic waveform in a short ventricular fibrillation pig model.
    Li Y; Wang H; Cho JH; Didon JP; Bisera J; Weil MH; Tang W
    Resuscitation; 2009 Sep; 80(9):1047-51. PubMed ID: 19604618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Letter by Tang et al regarding article, "BIPHASIC trial: a randomized comparison of fixed lower versus escalating higher energy levels for defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest".
    Tang W; Weil MH; White RD
    Circulation; 2007 Nov; 116(19):e522; author reply e523. PubMed ID: 17984386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimal interruption of cardiopulmonary resuscitation for a single shock as mandated by automated external defibrillations does not compromise outcomes in a porcine model of cardiac arrest and resuscitation.
    Ristagno G; Tang W; Russell JK; Jorgenson D; Wang H; Sun S; Weil MH
    Crit Care Med; 2008 Nov; 36(11):3048-53. PubMed ID: 18824916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A case of ventricular fibrillation treated by electric defibrillation associated with intracardial administration of inderal].
    Stasiewicz J; Manaczyński A; Szalaj W; Hofman J
    Wiad Lek; 1969 Sep; 22(17):1589-92. PubMed ID: 5349924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Theory and practice of defibrillation: (2) defibrillation for ventricular fibrillation.
    Adgey AA; Spence MS; Walsh SJ
    Heart; 2005 Jan; 91(1):118-25. PubMed ID: 15604356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Defibrillation in clinical practice.
    Nolan JP; Soar J
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2009 Jun; 15(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19262373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting successful defibrillation-are we there yet?
    Price RA
    Resuscitation; 2008 Dec; 79(3):343-5. PubMed ID: 18951681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Problems related to ventricular fibrillation and cardiac defibrillation].
    De Blasi S
    Minerva Anestesiol; 1966 Mar; 32(3):140-3. PubMed ID: 5933685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of transesophageal defibrillation in ventricular fibrillation of long duration.
    Mischke K; Schimpf T; Knackstedt C; Eickholt C; Hanrath P; Kelm M; Schauerte P
    Am J Emerg Med; 2008 Mar; 26(3):287-90. PubMed ID: 18358938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [History and perspectives of the defibrillation].
    Isaev GO; Vasin AА; Mironova OI
    Ter Arkh; 2021 Sep; 93(9):1138-1143. PubMed ID: 36286876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.