These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18039035)

  • 21. Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata) quickly detect snakes but not spiders: Evolutionary origins of fear-relevant animals.
    Kawai N; Koda H
    J Comp Psychol; 2016 Aug; 130(3):299-303. PubMed ID: 27078076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Early visual processing of snakes and angry faces: An ERP study.
    Langeslag SJE; van Strien JW
    Brain Res; 2018 Jan; 1678():297-303. PubMed ID: 29102778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Visual search with biological threat stimuli: accuracy, reaction times, and heart rate changes.
    Flykt A
    Emotion; 2005 Sep; 5(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 16187870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Differences in cognitive processing between snakes and guns: Evidence from electroencephalography.
    Wang X; Cong L; Hu W
    Neurosci Lett; 2023 May; 805():137225. PubMed ID: 37019271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Skin conductance responses to masked conditioned stimuli: phylogenetic/ontogenetic factors versus direction of threat?
    Flykt A; Esteves F; Ohman A
    Biol Psychol; 2007 Mar; 74(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 17049710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rapid detection of snakes by Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata): an evolutionarily predisposed visual system.
    Shibasaki M; Kawai N
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 May; 123(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 19450020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Detecting the snake in the grass: attention to fear-relevant stimuli by adults and young children.
    Lobue V; DeLoache JS
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Mar; 19(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 18315802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Spider vs. guns: expectancy and attention biases to phylogenetic threat do not extend to ontogenetic threat.
    Abado E; Aue T; Okon-Singer H
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1232985. PubMed ID: 37711323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Measuring attentional biases for threat in children and adults.
    LoBue V
    J Vis Exp; 2014 Oct; (92):e52190. PubMed ID: 25350590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of visual threat on spatial attention to touch.
    Poliakoff E; Miles E; Li X; Blanchette I
    Cognition; 2007 Mar; 102(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 16500638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Attentional modulation of visual-evoked potentials by threat: investigating the effect of evolutionary relevance.
    Brown C; El-Deredy W; Blanchette I
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Dec; 74(3):281-7. PubMed ID: 20888109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. We prefer what we fear: A response preference bias mimics attentional capture in spider fear.
    Haberkamp A; Biafora M; Schmidt T; Weiß K
    J Anxiety Disord; 2018 Jan; 53():30-38. PubMed ID: 29156434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Preattentive processing, preparedness and phobias: effects of instruction on conditioned electrodermal responses to masked and non-masked fear-relevant stimuli.
    Soares JJ; Ohman A
    Behav Res Ther; 1993 Jan; 31(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 8417731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Threat modulates perception of looming visual stimuli.
    Vagnoni E; Lourenco SF; Longo MR
    Curr Biol; 2012 Oct; 22(19):R826-7. PubMed ID: 23058796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Is it dangerous? The role of an emotional visual search strategy and threat-relevant training in the detection of guns and knives.
    Damjanovic L; Williot A; Blanchette I
    Br J Psychol; 2020 May; 111(2):275-296. PubMed ID: 31190378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Hidden Snake in the Grass: Superior Detection of Snakes in Challenging Attentional Conditions.
    Soares SC; Lindström B; Esteves F; Ohman A
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e114724. PubMed ID: 25493937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A clash of values: Fear-relevant stimuli can enhance or corrupt adaptive behavior through competition between Pavlovian and instrumental valuation systems.
    Lindström B; Golkar A; Olsson A
    Emotion; 2015 Oct; 15(5):668-76. PubMed ID: 25893448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Better safe than sorry: simplistic fear-relevant stimuli capture attention.
    Forbes SJ; Purkis HM; Lipp OV
    Cogn Emot; 2011 Aug; 25(5):794-804. PubMed ID: 21824021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A glimpse of fear: Fast detection of threatening targets in visual search with brief stimulus durations.
    Soares SC; Esteves F
    Psych J; 2013 Apr; 2(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 26272860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. But what about the Empress of Racnoss? The allocation of attention to spiders and Doctor Who in a visual search task is predicted by fear and expertise.
    Purkis HM; Lester KJ; Field AP
    Emotion; 2011 Dec; 11(6):1484-8. PubMed ID: 21707142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.