These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18039208)

  • 21. Prosthesis-patient mismatch in bovine pericardial aortic valves: evaluation using 3 different modalities and associated medium-term outcomes.
    Chacko SJ; Ansari AH; McCarthy PM; Malaisrie SC; Andrei AC; Li Z; Lee R; McGee E; Bonow RO; Puthumana JJ
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Sep; 6(5):776-83. PubMed ID: 23926194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. CT-Defined Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Downgrades Frequency and Severity, and Demonstrates No Association With Adverse Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Mooney J; Sellers SL; Blanke P; Pibarot P; Hahn RT; Dvir D; Douglas PS; Weissman NJ; Kodali SK; Thourani VH; Jilaihawi H; Khalique O; Smith CR; Kueh SH; Ohana M; Grover R; Naoum C; Crowley A; Jaber WA; Alu MC; Parvataneni R; Mack M; Webb JG; Leon MB; Leipsic JA
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Aug; 10(15):1578-1587. PubMed ID: 28734891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Patient-prosthesis mismatch and left ventricular remodelling after implantation of Shelhigh SuperStentless aortic valve prostheses.
    Germing A; Lindstaedt M; Holt S; Reber D; Mügge A; Laczkovics A; Fritz M
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2008 Aug; 49(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 18665119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Stentless vs. stented aortic valve bioprostheses: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Dunning J; Graham RJ; Thambyrajah J; Stewart MJ; Kendall SW; Hunter S
    Eur Heart J; 2007 Oct; 28(19):2369-74. PubMed ID: 17670757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Enhanced left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis is associated with improved long-term survival.
    Ali A; Patel A; Ali Z; Abu-Omar Y; Saeed A; Athanasiou T; Pepper J
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2011 Aug; 142(2):285-91. PubMed ID: 21272899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of the increase in valve area after aortic valve replacement with a 19-mm aortic valve prosthesis on left ventricular mass regression in patients with pure aortic stenosis.
    Mhagna Z; Tasca G; Brunelli F; Cirillo M; Amaducci A; DallaTomba M; Troise G
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2006 May; 7(5):351-5. PubMed ID: 16645414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Patient-prosthesis mismatch has no influence on in-hospital mortality after aortic valve replacement.
    Yottasurodom C; Namthaisong K; Porapakkham P; Kasemsarn C; Chotivatanapong T; Chaiseri P; Wongdit S; Yasotarin S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Aug; 95 Suppl 8():S64-70. PubMed ID: 23130477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with 17-mm St Jude Medical mechanical prostheses in isolated aortic stenosis.
    Amarelli C; Della Corte A; Romano G; Iasevoli G; Dialetto G; De Santo LS; De Feo M; Torella M; Scardone M; Cotrufo M
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Mar; 129(3):512-7. PubMed ID: 15746732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Severe prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: Analysis of risk factors for early and long-term mortality.
    Mannacio V; Mannacio L; Mango E; Antignano A; Mottola M; Caparrotti S; Musumeci F; Vosa C
    J Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 69(1):333-339. PubMed ID: 27492659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch estimated by echocardiographic-determined effective orifice area on long-term outcome after aortic valve replacement.
    Florath I; Albert A; Rosendahl U; Ennker IC; Ennker J
    Am Heart J; 2008 Jun; 155(6):1135-42. PubMed ID: 18513530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Impact of postoperative blood pressure control on regression of left ventricular mass following valve replacement for aortic stenosis.
    Imanaka K; Kohmoto O; Nishimura S; Yokote Y; Kyo S
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Jun; 27(6):994-9. PubMed ID: 15896607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Moderate prosthesis-patient mismatch may be negligible in elderly patients undergoing conventional aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.
    Kitamura T; Torii S; Hanayama N; Oka N; Tomoyasu T; Irisawa Y; Shibata M; Hayashi H; Inoue T; Miyaji K
    Int Heart J; 2013; 54(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 23428918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch and aortic valve design on coronary flow reserve after aortic valve replacement.
    Bakhtiary F; Schiemann M; Dzemali O; Dogan S; Schächinger V; Ackermann H; Moritz A; Kleine P
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Feb; 49(7):790-6. PubMed ID: 17306709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Determinants of Left Ventricular Mass Regression in Patients with Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.
    Weissler-Snir A; Shapira Y; Sagie A; Kazum S; Assali A; Vaknin-Assa H; Bental T; Codner P; Orvin K; Kornowski R; Vaturi M
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2015 May; 24(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 26901894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Abnormal Tei index predicts poor left ventricular mass regression and survival after AVR in aortic stenosis patients.
    Tao K; Sakata R; Iguro Y; Ueno T; Ueno M; Tanaka Y; Otsuji Y; Tei C
    J Cardiol; 2009 Apr; 53(2):240-7. PubMed ID: 19304129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Patient-prosthesis mismatch after aortic valve replacement; tolerable lower limit of indexed effective orifice area].
    Kaminishi Y; Oki S; Saito T; Konishi H; Misawa Y
    Kyobu Geka; 2006 Apr; 59(4):319-23. PubMed ID: 16613151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prosthesis-patient mismatch in the elderly: survival, ventricular mass regression, and quality of life.
    Vicchio M; Della Corte A; De Santo LS; De Feo M; Caianiello G; Scardone M; Cotrufo M
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Dec; 86(6):1791-7. PubMed ID: 19021978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Long-term Functional Capacity After Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Petit-Eisenmann H; Epailly E; Velten M; Radojevic J; Eisenmann B; Kremer H; Kindo M
    Can J Cardiol; 2016 Dec; 32(12):1493-1499. PubMed ID: 27297001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Aortic valve replacement with 19-mm bileaflet prostheses in the elderly: left ventricular mass regression and quality of life.
    Vicchio M; De Santo LS; Della Corte A; De Feo M; Provenzano R; Miraglia M; Scardone M; Cotrufo M
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Mar; 17(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 18512494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impact of the improvement of valve area achieved with aortic valve replacement on the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with pure aortic stenosis.
    Tasca G; Brunelli F; Cirillo M; Dalla Tomba M; Mhagna Z; Troise G; Quaini E
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Apr; 79(4):1291-6; discussion 1296. PubMed ID: 15797064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.