228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18041507)
1. Evidence-based assessment of tooth-colored restorations in proximal lesions of primary molars.
Toh SL; Messer LB
Pediatr Dent; 2007; 29(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 18041507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Resin-modified and conventional glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth: 8-year results.
Qvist V; Manscher E; Teglers PT
J Dent; 2004 May; 32(4):285-94. PubMed ID: 15053911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Silver amalgam versus resin modified GIC class-II restorations in primary molars: twelve month clinical evaluation.
Dutta BN; Gauba K; Tewari A; Chawla HS
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2001 Sep; 19(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 11817797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite.
Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Buchalla W; Mönting JS
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Survival of Adhesive Restorations for Primary Molars: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis of Clinical Trials.
Santos AP; Moreira IK; Scarpelli AC; Pordeus IA; Paiva SM; Martins CC
Pediatr Dent; 2016 Oct; 38(5):370-378. PubMed ID: 28206891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Retrospective Study of the 3-Year Survival Rate of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Class II Restorations in Primary Molars.
Webman M; Mulki E; Roldan R; Arevalo O; Roberts JF; Garcia-Godoy F
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 26696100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Restoring proximal lesions in the primary dentition: is glass ionomer cement the material of choice?
Scott JM; Mahoney EK
N Z Dent J; 2003 Sep; 99(3):65-71. PubMed ID: 15328832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation.
Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Mönting JS
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 11203828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomised trial of resin-based restorations in Class I and Class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 48-month results.
Alves dos Santos MP; Luiz RR; Maia LC
J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 20188783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Flowable resin composite as a class II restorative in primary molars: A two-year clinical evaluation.
Andersson-Wenckert I; Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K
Acta Odontol Scand; 2006 Nov; 64(6):334-40. PubMed ID: 17123909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.
Pascon FM; Kantovitz KR; Caldo-Teixeira AS; Borges AF; Silva TN; Puppin-Rontani RM; Garcia-Godoy F
J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of cavity preparation and lamination on bond strength and fracture of tooth-colored restorations in primary molars.
Suwatviroj P; Messer LB; Palamara JE
Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 14733466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical Evaluation of Restorative Materials in Primary Teeth Class II Lesions.
Sengul F; Gurbuz T
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 39(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 26161601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars--a three year clinical evaluation.
Ostlund J; Möller K; Koch G
Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 1496459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture frequency and longevity of fractured resin composite, polyacid-modified resin composite, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement class IV restorations: an up to 14 years of follow-up.
van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Apr; 14(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 19504133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the clinical behavior of resin modified glass ionomer cement on primary molars: a comparative one-year study.
Prabhakar AR; Raju OS; Kurthukoti AJ; Satish V
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 18264535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations.
Hickel R; Manhart J; García-Godoy F
Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):41D-54D. PubMed ID: 11763918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vitremer restorative cement for children: three clinicians' observations in three pediatric dental practices.
Croll TP; Helpin ML; Donly KJ
ASDC J Dent Child; 2000; 67(6):391-8, 374. PubMed ID: 11204061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Caries control and other variables associated with success of primary molar vital pulp therapy.
Vij R; Coll JA; Shelton P; Farooq NS
Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 15185801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions.
van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):915-22. PubMed ID: 18155288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
