These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

985 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18042573)

  • 1. Quality assurance questionnaire for professionals fails to improve the quality of informed consent.
    Lavori PW; Wilt TJ; Sugarman J
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(6):638-49. PubMed ID: 18042573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reasons for participation in pain research: can they indicate a lack of informed consent?
    Wasan AD; Taubenberger SP; Robinson WM
    Pain Med; 2009 Jan; 10(1):111-9. PubMed ID: 18657219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are subjects satisfied with the informed consent process? A survey of research participants.
    Pope JE; Tingey DP; Arnold JM; Hong P; Ouimet JM; Krizova A
    J Rheumatol; 2003 Apr; 30(4):815-24. PubMed ID: 12672205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding the decisions of cancer clinical trial participants to enter research studies: factors associated with informed consent, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret.
    Stryker JE; Wray RJ; Emmons KM; Winer E; Demetri G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16242898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Therapeutic misconception and the appreciation of risks in clinical trials.
    Lidz CW; Appelbaum PS; Grisso T; Renaud M
    Soc Sci Med; 2004 May; 58(9):1689-97. PubMed ID: 14990370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethical communication in clinical trials. Issues faced by data managers in obtaining informed consent.
    Loh WY; Butow PN; Brown RF; Boyle F
    Cancer; 2002 Dec; 95(11):2414-21. PubMed ID: 12436450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recruitment of subjects for clinical trials after informed consent: does gender and educational status make a difference?
    Gitanjali B; Raveendran R; Pandian DG; Sujindra S
    J Postgrad Med; 2003; 49(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 12867683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The performance and perception of informed consent in a health-care section of Catalonia].
    Guix Oliver J; Balañà Fort L; Carbonell Riera JM; Simón Pérez R; Surroca Macià RM; Nualart Berbel L
    Rev Esp Salud Publica; 1999; 73(6):669-75. PubMed ID: 10709392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing an alternate informed consent process.
    Yates BC; Dodendorf D; Lane J; LaFramboise L; Pozehl B; Duncan K; Knodel K
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 19289935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discrepancy between participants' understanding and desire to know in informed consent: are they informed about what they really want to know?
    Koh J; Goh E; Yu KS; Cho B; Yang JH
    J Med Ethics; 2012 Feb; 38(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 21708828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of informed consent: a pilot study.
    Länsimies-Antikainen H; Pietilä AM; Laitinen T; Schwab U; Rauramaa R; Länsimies E
    J Adv Nurs; 2007 Jul; 59(2):146-54. PubMed ID: 17543012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Voluntary informed consent in research and clinical care: an update.
    Cahana A; Hurst SA
    Pain Pract; 2008; 8(6):446-51. PubMed ID: 19000172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [How informed is patient consent to interventional cardiology procedures. A quality assurance survey by the nurses].
    Steffenino G; Aimar F; Bogetti M; Dutto MS; Dutto M; Lice G; Mogna A; Tomatis M; Conte L
    Ital Heart J Suppl; 2005 Jan; 6(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 15776730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of informed consent in health research: a questionnaire survey.
    Länsimies-Antikainen H; Laitinen T; Rauramaa R; Pietilä AM
    Scand J Caring Sci; 2010 Mar; 24(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 19552792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new brief instrument for assessing decisional capacity for clinical research.
    Jeste DV; Palmer BW; Appelbaum PS; Golshan S; Glorioso D; Dunn LB; Kim K; Meeks T; Kraemer HC
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 2007 Aug; 64(8):966-74. PubMed ID: 17679641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enhancement of surgical informed consent by addition of repeat back: a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Fink AS; Prochazka AV; Henderson WG; Bartenfeld D; Nyirenda C; Webb A; Berger DH; Itani K; Whitehill T; Edwards J; Wilson M; Karsonovich C; Parmelee P
    Ann Surg; 2010 Jul; 252(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 20562609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Levels of knowledge and perceived understanding among participants in cancer clinical trials - factors related to the informed consent procedure.
    Bergenmar M; Johansson H; Wilking N
    Clin Trials; 2011 Feb; 8(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 21109583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The quality of parental consent for research with children: a prospective repeated measure self-report survey.
    Franck LS; Winter I; Oulton K
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2007 May; 44(4):525-33. PubMed ID: 16712850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. I don't like that, it's tricking people too much...: acute informed consent to participation in a trial of thrombolysis for stroke.
    Mangset M; Førde R; Nessa J; Berge E; Wyller TB
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Oct; 34(10):751-6. PubMed ID: 18827109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Who will consent to emergency treatment trials for subarachnoid hemorrhage?
    Del Giudice A; Plaum J; Maloney E; Kasner SE; Le Roux PD; Baren JM
    Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Apr; 16(4):309-15. PubMed ID: 19298620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 50.