These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18043056)

  • 1. Craniocervical motion during direct laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation with the Macintosh and Miller blades: an in vivo cinefluoroscopic study.
    LeGrand SA; Hindman BJ; Dexter F; Weeks JB; Todd MM
    Anesthesiology; 2007 Dec; 107(6):884-91. PubMed ID: 18043056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomized crossover trial comparing cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with a Macintosh laryngoscope versus a C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope in a simulated immobilized cervical spine.
    Paik H; Park HP
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2020 Aug; 20(1):201. PubMed ID: 32799791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cervical spine motion with direct laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation. An in vivo cinefluoroscopic study of subjects without cervical abnormality.
    Sawin PD; Todd MM; Traynelis VC; Farrell SB; Nader A; Sato Y; Clausen JD; Goel VK
    Anesthesiology; 1996 Jul; 85(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 8694378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Cervical spine movement during orotracheal intubation using the McCoy laryngoscope compared with the Macintosh and the Miller laryngoscopes].
    Konishi A; Sakai T; Nishiyama T; Higashizawa T; Bito H
    Masui; 1997 Jan; 46(1):124-7. PubMed ID: 9028096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does the Miller blade truly provide a better laryngoscopic view and intubating conditions than the Macintosh blade in small children?
    Varghese E; Kundu R
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2014 Aug; 24(8):825-9. PubMed ID: 24690084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intubation biomechanics: laryngoscope force and cervical spine motion during intubation in cadavers-effect of severe distractive-flexion injury on C3-4 motion.
    Hindman BJ; Fontes RB; From RP; Traynelis VC; Todd MM; Puttlitz CM; Santoni BG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Nov; 25(5):545-555. PubMed ID: 27231810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomized cinefluoroscopic comparison of cervical spine motion using McGrath series 5 and Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation with manual in-line stabilization.
    Laosuwan P; Earsakul A; Numkarunarunrote N; Khamjaisai J; Charuluxananan S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2015 Jan; 98 Suppl 1():S63-9. PubMed ID: 25764615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Airway risk factors for the Miller laryngoscope blade.
    Landry WB; Nossaman BD
    J Clin Anesth; 2016 Sep; 33():62-7. PubMed ID: 27555135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. View of the larynx obtained using the Miller blade and paraglossal approach, compared to that with the Macintosh blade.
    Achen B; Terblanche OC; Finucane BT
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2008 Sep; 36(5):717-21. PubMed ID: 18853593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Manual in-line stabilization increases pressures applied by the laryngoscope blade during direct laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation.
    Santoni BG; Hindman BJ; Puttlitz CM; Weeks JB; Johnson N; Maktabi MA; Todd MM
    Anesthesiology; 2009 Jan; 110(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 19104166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy with the Bullard, Macintosh, and Miller laryngoscopes.
    Hastings RH; Vigil AC; Hanna R; Yang BY; Sartoris DJ
    Anesthesiology; 1995 Apr; 82(4):859-69. PubMed ID: 7717556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the Bullard and Macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation of patients with a potential cervical spine injury.
    Watts AD; Gelb AW; Bach DB; Pelz DM
    Anesthesiology; 1997 Dec; 87(6):1335-42. PubMed ID: 9416718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of cervical spine immobilization technique and laryngoscope blade selection on an unstable cervical spine in a cadaver model of intubation.
    Gerling MC; Davis DP; Hamilton RS; Morris GF; Vilke GM; Garfin SR; Hayden SR
    Ann Emerg Med; 2000 Oct; 36(4):293-300. PubMed ID: 11020675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Flexiblade and Macintosh laryngoscopes: cervical extension angles during orotracheal intubation.
    Uzun S; Erden IA; Pamuk AG; Yavuz K; Cekirge S; Aypar U
    Anaesthesia; 2010 Jul; 65(7):692-6. PubMed ID: 20642524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway-assisted Flexible Bronchoscopic Intubation Is Associated With Reduced Cervical Spine Motion When Compared With C-MAC Video Laryngoscopy-guided Intubation: A Prospective Randomized Cross Over Trial.
    Swain A; Bhagat H; Gupta V; Salunke P; Panda NB; Sahu S
    J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2020 Jul; 32(3):242-248. PubMed ID: 30893284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy using the Airtraq or Macintosh laryngoscopes.
    Hirabayashi Y; Fujita A; Seo N; Sugimoto H
    Anaesthesia; 2008 Jun; 63(6):635-40. PubMed ID: 18477276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with manual in-line stabilization: direct laryngoscopy versus GlideScope videolaryngoscopy.
    Robitaille A; Williams SR; Tremblay MH; Guilbert F; Thériault M; Drolet P
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Mar; 106(3):935-41, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18292443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new universal laryngoscope blade: a preliminary comparison with Macintosh laryngoscope blades.
    Gerlach K; Wenzel V; von Knobelsdorff G; Steinfath M; Dörges V
    Resuscitation; 2003 Apr; 57(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 12668301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Airway scope laryngoscopy under manual inline stabilization and cervical collar immobilization: a crossover in vivo cinefluoroscopic study.
    Aoi Y; Inagawa G; Hashimoto K; Tashima H; Tsuboi S; Takahata T; Nakamura K; Goto T
    J Trauma; 2011 Jul; 71(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 20805775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of 4 airway devices on cervical spine alignment in a cadaver model with global ligamentous instability at C5-C6.
    Prasarn ML; Conrad B; Rubery PT; Wendling A; Aydog T; Horodyski M; Rechtine GR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Mar; 37(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 21629162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.