BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18043495)

  • 1. Active noise reduction audiometry: a prospective analysis of a new approach to noise management in audiometric testing.
    Bromwich MA; Parsa V; Lanthier N; Yoo J; Parnes LS
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Jan; 118(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 18043495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Mobile soundproof booth for audiometric industrial testing].
    Grzesik J; Kowalska H; Pawlas K
    Med Pr; 1977; 28(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 865269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Aided and unaided narrow band noise thresholds in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment.
    Garstecki DC; Bode DL
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 1(6):258-62. PubMed ID: 931761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of noise bands on contralateral pure tone adaptation.
    Meyer RC; Schubert GW; Holzwarth HR
    Laryngoscope; 1975 Aug; 85(8):1367-73. PubMed ID: 1160467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Smartphone-Facilitated In-Situ Hearing Aid Audiometry for Community-Based Hearing Testing.
    Frisby C; De Sousa KC; Eikelboom RH; Mahomed-Asmail F; Moore DR; de Kock T; Manchaiah V; Swanepoel W
    Ear Hear; 2024 Jul-Aug 01; 45(4):1019-1032. PubMed ID: 38424667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attenuation of hearing protectors at 85 dB SPL investigated by commercial "insertion gain" method.
    Woxen O; Borchgrevink HM
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1991; 34():145-55. PubMed ID: 1842461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Noise attenuation characteristics of the MX-41/AR and the Telephonics circumaural audiometric headsets.
    Bienvenue GR; Michael PL
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 4(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 721665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the noise attenuation of three audiometric earphones, with additional data on masking near threshold.
    Berger EH; Killion MC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Oct; 86(4):1392-403. PubMed ID: 2808913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Effectiveness of ear protective devices].
    Taniewski M; Zaborski L; Szczepański C; Nitka J
    Med Pr; 1978; 29(4):307-16. PubMed ID: 723611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Narrow band noise audiometry: the effect of filter slope.
    Orchik DJ; Mosher NL
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1975; 1(2):50-3. PubMed ID: 1232074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Clinical trial of BOBCAT: 1st report on the reliability and validity of computerized pure-tone audiometry].
    Picard M; Ilecki HJ; Baxter JD
    Audiology; 1988; 27(4):234-46. PubMed ID: 3056359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Auditory threshold for white noise].
    Carrat R; Thillier JL; Durivault J
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1975; 92(10-11):585-600. PubMed ID: 1211738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noise-excluding enclosure for audiometry.
    Stark EW; Borton TE
    Audiology; 1975; 14(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 1131126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The threshold of 1.5 khz as a graduator for the noise induced hearing defect (author's transl)].
    Schwetz F
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1978 Dec; 57(12):1052-8. PubMed ID: 732483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. White noise use among children undergoing sound field audiometry: A preliminary study.
    Ma AC; Rosi-Schumacher M; Corbin AF; Geisen H; Carr MM
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jun; 181():111982. PubMed ID: 38776720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A comparative audiometric study inside and outside of a sound-absorbing chamber].
    Ferráez-Torres H; Salazar-Schettino B; Aguilar-Reyes A; Martínez-Murillo F; Legaspi-Velasco JA
    Gac Med Mex; 1989; 125(5-6):161-3. PubMed ID: 2633952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Real ear attenuation at threshold for three audiometric headphone devices: implications for maximum permissible ambient noise level standards.
    Franks JR; Engel DP; Themann CL
    Ear Hear; 1992 Feb; 13(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 1541370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of a new noise helmet.
    Pääkkönen R; Vienamo T; Järvinen J; Hämäläinen E
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1991 Oct; 52(10):438-44. PubMed ID: 1951055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pure tone audiometry in noise with auraldomes.
    Roeser RJ; Glorig A
    Audiology; 1975; 14(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 1131120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Determination of the subjective sound damping of radio receiver earphones using Békésy exper. audiometery in an open sound field].
    Bursch S; Demus HG; Lorenz W
    Z Gesamte Hyg; 1979; 25(9):680-4. PubMed ID: 516818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.