121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1804399)
1. The next Wanglie case: the problems of litigating medical ethics.
Mishkin DB
J Clin Ethics; 1991; 2(4):282-5; discussion 285-6. PubMed ID: 1804399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The fusion of medicine and law for in extremis health and medical decisions: does it produce energy and light or just cosmic debris?
Bellacosa JW
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1990; 18(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 2328334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Autonomy, futility, and the limits of medicine.
Schwartz RL
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1992; 1(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 1342344
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In the Supreme Court of the United States. No. 88-1503. Nancy Beth Cruzan, by her parents and co-guardians, Lester L. Cruzan, et ux., petitioners, v. Director, Missouri Department Health, et al.
Issues Law Med; 1990; 5(4):453-78. PubMed ID: 2108100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Futility and the goals of medicine.
Rhodes R
J Clin Ethics; 1998; 9(2):194-205. PubMed ID: 9750993
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The best-interest standard: surrogate decision making and quality of life.
Drane JF; Coulehan JL
J Clin Ethics; 1995; 6(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 7632992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A medicine of strangers or a medicine of intimates. The two legacies of Karen Ann Quinlan.
Siegler M
Second Opin; 1992 Apr; 17(4):64-9. PubMed ID: 10118417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The medical futility debate continues.
Struthers MS; Olson BC
Minn Med; 1995 Feb; 78(2):29-32. PubMed ID: 7891646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethics committees in critical care.
Paris JJ; Reardon FE
Crit Care Clin; 1986 Jan; 2(1):111-21. PubMed ID: 3331303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In the matter of Arnold Shumosic.
Thompson G
Issues Law Med; 1990; 5(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 2108101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Mrs. Wanglie and "doctor knows best" and making decisions for those who cannot decide for themselves: autonomy in two recent cases.
Rouse F
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1992; 1(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 1342345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical ethics after Quinlan: guidelines and the ethics of dying.
Hudson RP
J Kans Med Soc; 1982 Jul; 83(7):371-5, 340. PubMed ID: 7119537
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Refusing treatment for incompetent patients; why Quinlan and Saikewicz cases agree on roles of guardians, physicians, judges, and ethics committees.
Annas GJ
N Y State J Med; 1980 Apr; 80(5):816-21. PubMed ID: 6930563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In the matter of Claire C. Conroy.
Marzen TJ
Issues Law Med; 1985 Jul; 1(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 3850083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Withholding life-prolonging medical treatment from the institutionalized person--who decides?
Corbett KA; Raciti RM
New Engl J Prison Law; 1976; 3(1):47-83. PubMed ID: 11664738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment of incompetent terminally ill patients. 1. The American experience.
Thomson CJ
Med J Aust; 1982 Feb; 1(4):188-90. PubMed ID: 7078492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Can healthcare providers obtain judicial intervention against surrogates who demand "medically inappropriate" life support for incompetent patients?
Cantor NL
Crit Care Med; 1996 May; 24(5):883-7. PubMed ID: 8706470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Refusing medical treatment: incompetent adults.
Barnes G
Dimens Health Serv; 1983 Apr; 60(4):26-7, 29-30. PubMed ID: 6852401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Beyond autonomy: judicial restraint and the legal limits necessary to uphold the Hippocratic tradition and preserve the ethical integrity of the medical profession.
Murphy JJ
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():451-84. PubMed ID: 10126946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Is the continued provision of food and fluids in Nancy Cruzan's best interests?
Harris CE; Bostrom BA
Issues Law Med; 1990; 5(4):415-35. PubMed ID: 2108099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
