BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18044423)

  • 1. Attachment and biofilm formation by various serotypes of Salmonella as influenced by cellulose production and thin aggregative fimbriae biosynthesis.
    Jain S; Chen J
    J Food Prot; 2007 Nov; 70(11):2473-9. PubMed ID: 18044423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Survival potential of wild type cellulose deficient Salmonella from the feed industry.
    Vestby LK; Møretrø T; Ballance S; Langsrud S; Nesse LL
    BMC Vet Res; 2009 Nov; 5():43. PubMed ID: 19930629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Antibiotic resistance profiles and cell surface components of Salmonellae.
    Jain S; Chen J
    J Food Prot; 2006 May; 69(5):1017-23. PubMed ID: 16715798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ability of Salmonella spp. to produce biofilm is dependent on temperature and surface material.
    De Oliveira DC; Fernandes Júnior A; Kaneno R; Silva MG; Araújo Júnior JP; Silva NC; Rall VL
    Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2014 Jun; 11(6):478-83. PubMed ID: 24720488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analyses of the red-dry-rough phenotype of an Escherichia coli O157:H7 strain and its role in biofilm formation and resistance to antibacterial agents.
    Uhlich GA; Cooke PH; Solomon EB
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2006 Apr; 72(4):2564-72. PubMed ID: 16597958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multicellular and aggregative behaviour of Salmonella typhimurium strains is controlled by mutations in the agfD promoter.
    Römling U; Sierralta WD; Eriksson K; Normark S
    Mol Microbiol; 1998 Apr; 28(2):249-64. PubMed ID: 9622351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Significance of the rdar and bdar morphotypes in the hydrophobicity and attachment to abiotic surfaces of Salmonella Sofia and other poultry-associated Salmonella serovars.
    Chia TW; McMeekin TA; Fegan N; Dykes GA
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2011 Nov; 53(5):581-4. PubMed ID: 21899579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. gcpA (stm1987) is critical for cellulose production and biofilm formation on polystyrene surface by Salmonella enterica serovar Weltevreden in both high and low nutrient medium.
    Bhowmick PP; Devegowda D; Ruwandeepika HA; Fuchs TM; Srikumar S; Karunasagar I; Karunasagar I
    Microb Pathog; 2011 Feb; 50(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 21147214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biofilm forming properties of quinolone resistant Escherichia coli from the broiler production chain and their dynamics in mixed biofilms.
    Nesse LL; Osland AM; Mo SS; Sekse C; Slettemeås JS; Bruvoll AEE; Urdahl AM; Vestby LK
    BMC Microbiol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):46. PubMed ID: 32131730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Thin aggregative fimbriae and cellulose enhance long-term survival and persistence of Salmonella.
    White AP; Gibson DL; Kim W; Kay WW; Surette MG
    J Bacteriol; 2006 May; 188(9):3219-27. PubMed ID: 16621814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biofilm formation, cellulose production, and curli biosynthesis by Salmonella originating from produce, animal, and clinical sources.
    Solomon EB; Niemira BA; Sapers GM; Annous BA
    J Food Prot; 2005 May; 68(5):906-12. PubMed ID: 15895720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aggregation via the red, dry, and rough morphotype is not a virulence adaptation in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium.
    White AP; Gibson DL; Grassl GA; Kay WW; Finlay BB; Vallance BA; Surette MG
    Infect Immun; 2008 Mar; 76(3):1048-58. PubMed ID: 18195033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative genetics of the rdar morphotype in Salmonella.
    White AP; Surette MG
    J Bacteriol; 2006 Dec; 188(24):8395-406. PubMed ID: 17012381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biofilm formation of Salmonella serotypes in simulated meat processing environments and its relationship to cell characteristics.
    Wang H; Ding S; Dong Y; Ye K; Xu X; Zhou G
    J Food Prot; 2013 Oct; 76(10):1784-9. PubMed ID: 24112581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Survival of Tomato Outbreak Associated Salmonella Serotypes in Soil and Water and the Role of Biofilms in Abiotic Surface Attachment.
    Dev Kumar G; Williams RC; Sriranganathan N; Boyer RR; Eifert JD
    Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2018 Sep; 15(9):548-553. PubMed ID: 30010397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diversity in biofilm formation and production of curli fimbriae and cellulose of Salmonella Typhimurium strains of different origin in high and low nutrient medium.
    Castelijn GA; van der Veen S; Zwietering MH; Moezelaar R; Abee T
    Biofouling; 2012; 28(1):51-63. PubMed ID: 22235813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Occurrence and regulation of the multicellular morphotype in Salmonella serovars important in human disease.
    Römling U; Bokranz W; Rabsch W; Zogaj X; Nimtz M; Tschäpe H
    Int J Med Microbiol; 2003 Aug; 293(4):273-85. PubMed ID: 14503792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biofilm formation by multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serotype typhimurium phage type DT104 and other pathogens.
    Kim SH; Wei CI
    J Food Prot; 2007 Jan; 70(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 17265855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Control of the Biofilms Formed by Curli- and Cellulose-Expressing Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Using Treatments with Organic Acids and Commercial Sanitizers.
    Park YJ; Chen J
    J Food Prot; 2015 May; 78(5):990-5. PubMed ID: 25951395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biofilm Formation and Morphotypes of Salmonella enterica subsp.arizonae Differs from Those of Other Salmonella enterica Subspecies in Isolates from Poultry Houses.
    Lamas A; Fernandez-No IC; Miranda JM; Vázquez B; Cepeda A; Franco CM
    J Food Prot; 2016 Jul; 79(7):1127-34. PubMed ID: 27357031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.