339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18044721)
1. Rapid, high throughput determination of cervical cytology specimen adequacy using a capillary-based cytometer.
Polina R; Sturgis C; Patterson J; Patterson BK
Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2008 Mar; 74(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 18044721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Overview of the cytology laboratory: specimen processing through diagnosis.
Joste N
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2008 Dec; 35(4):549-63; viii. PubMed ID: 19061816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Repeating cytological preparations on liquid-based cytology samples: A methodological advantage?
Pinto AP; Maia HF; di Loretto C; Krunn P; Túlio S; Collaço LM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Oct; 35(10):663-9. PubMed ID: 17854084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of flow cytometry as a quality control device for liquid-based cervical cytology specimens.
Kottaridi C; Georgoulakis J; Kassanos D; Pappas A; Spathis A; Margari N; Aninos D; Karakitsos P
Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2010 Jan; 78(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 19746413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
McGoogan E; Colgan TJ; Ramzy I; Cochand-Priollet B; Davey DD; Grohs HK; Gurley AM; Husain OA; Hutchinson ML; Knesel EA; Linder J; Mango LJ; Mitchell H; Peebles A; Reith A; Robinowitz M; Sauer T; Shida S; Solomon D; Topalidis T; Wilbur DC; Yamauchi K
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 9479321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determination of liquid-based cervical cytology specimen adequacy using cellular light scatter and flow cytometry.
Grundhoefer D; Patterson BK
Cytometry; 2001 Dec; 46(6):340-4. PubMed ID: 11754203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Proteomic analysis of high-grade dysplastic cervical cells obtained from ThinPrep slides using laser capture microdissection and mass spectrometry.
Gu Y; Wu SL; Meyer JL; Hancock WS; Burg LJ; Linder J; Hanlon DW; Karger BL
J Proteome Res; 2007 Nov; 6(11):4256-68. PubMed ID: 17902640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Two cytological methods for screening for cervical cancer].
Kirschner B; Simonsen K; Junge J
Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 May; 170(22):1933-7. PubMed ID: 18513478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of lubricant contamination on ThinPrep (Cytyc) cervical cytology liquid-based preparations.
Holton T; Smith D; Terry M; Madgwick A; Levine T
Cytopathology; 2008 Aug; 19(4):236-43. PubMed ID: 18093222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reprocessing unsatisfactory ThinPrep Papanicolaou test specimens increases sample adequacy and detection of significant cervicovaginal lesions.
Islam S; West AM; Saboorian MH; Ashfaq R
Cancer; 2004 Apr; 102(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 15098249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and fluid-based, thin-layer cytology with colposcopic biopsy control in central Italy: a consecutive sampling study of 461 cases.
Rahimi S; Carnovale-Scalzo C; Marani C; Renzi C; Malvasi A; Votano S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Jan; 37(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 18973131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Cytological screening of uterine cervical cancer by samples in liquid medium (CytoRich). Preliminary study of a series of 111 292 patients].
Saurel J; Rabreau M; Landi M; Bondu C; Montoya G; Morancé C; Auber M; Percheron N; Santa-Maria M; Bec M; Berteau MJ; Muller E; Gominet C; Besserves S; Thomas E
Contracept Fertil Sex; 1999 Dec; 27(12):853-7. PubMed ID: 10676042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical parameters associated with unsatisfactory specimens of conventional cervical smears.
Lu CH; Chang CC; Chang MC; Chen SJ; Jan YJ; Fu TF; Ho ES
Diagn Cytopathol; 2011 Feb; 39(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 20091895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of the ThinPrep monolayer technique and conventional cervical Pap smears in a high-risk population using the Munich II nomenclature].
Lellé RJ; Cordes A; Regidor M; Maier E; Flenker H
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2007; 47(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 17440269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Increased detection of epithelial cell abnormalities by liquid-based gynecologic cytology preparations. A review of accumulated data.
Austin RM; Ramzy I
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):178-84. PubMed ID: 9479337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Location-guided screening of liquid-based cervical cytology specimens: a potential improvement in accuracy and productivity is demonstrated in a preclinical feasibility trial.
Wilbur DC; Parker EM; Foti JA
Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Sep; 118(3):399-407. PubMed ID: 12219782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of screening times between the ThinPrep Imager and conventional cytology.
Boost T
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Sep; 37(9):661-4. PubMed ID: 19459203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multicenter masked evaluation of AutoCyte PREP thin layers with matched conventional smears. Including initial biopsy results.
Bishop JW; Bigner SH; Colgan TJ; Husain M; Howell LP; McIntosh KM; Taylor DA; Sadeghi MH
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):189-97. PubMed ID: 9479339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for collecting samples for conventional and liquid-based cytology.
Arbyn M; Herbert A; Schenck U; Nieminen P; Jordan J; Mcgoogan E; Patnick J; Bergeron C; Baldauf JJ; Klinkhamer P; Bulten J; Martin-Hirsch P
Cytopathology; 2007 Jun; 18(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 17573762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Specimen adequacy of ThinPrep sample preparations in a direct-to-vial study.
Corkill M; Knapp D; Martin J; Hutchinson ML
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 9022724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
