339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18044721)
21. Application of flow cytometry for biomarker-based cervical cancer cells detection.
Ling J; Wiederkehr U; Cabiness S; Shroyer KR; Robinson JP
Diagn Cytopathol; 2008 Feb; 36(2):76-84. PubMed ID: 18181189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Liquid-based cytology and conventional smears compared over two 12-month periods.
Williams AR
Cytopathology; 2006 Apr; 17(2):82-5. PubMed ID: 16548992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Causes and relevance of unsatisfactory and satisfactory but limited smears of liquid-based compared with conventional cervical cytology.
Siebers AG; Klinkhamer PJ; Vedder JE; Arbyn M; Bulten J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Jan; 136(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 22208490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Liquid-based cytology can improve efficiency of cervical smear readers: evidence from timing surveys in two NHS cytology laboratories.
Dowie R; Stoykova B; Crawford D; Desai M; Mather J; Morgan K; Shirt M
Cytopathology; 2006 Apr; 17(2):65-72. PubMed ID: 16548990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Two techniques for cervical smear sampling.
Prescrire Int; 2010 Aug; 19(108):176. PubMed ID: 20939455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Direct intrauterine sampling with Uterobrush: cell preparation by the "flicked" method.
Fujihara A; Norimatsu Y; Kobayashi TK; Iwanari O; Nagaoka S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Jul; 34(7):486-90. PubMed ID: 16783769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Fundamental study of automatic cytoscreening for uterine cancer. IV. Sample requirements for CYBEST and simulation test of cell dispersion.
Tanaka N; Ikeda H; Ueno T; Watanabe S; Imasato Y; Tsunekawa S
Acta Cytol; 1977; 21(4):531-5. PubMed ID: 333840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [New version of the pathology practice guideline for cervical cytology: sharpened criteria for adequacy; expanded use of new techniques].
van Kemenade FJ; Wiersma T; Helmerhorst TJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Jun; 151(23):1283-6. PubMed ID: 17624158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Using a quality control approach to define an 'adequately cellular' liquid-based cervical cytology specimen.
McQueen F; Duvall E
Cytopathology; 2006 Aug; 17(4):168-74. PubMed ID: 16879263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smear and SurePath liquid-based cytology in the Copenhagen population screening programme for cervical cancer.
Kirschner B; Simonsen K; Junge J
Cytopathology; 2006 Aug; 17(4):187-94. PubMed ID: 16879266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A study of cellular counting to determine minimum thresholds for adequacy for liquid-based cervical cytology using a survey and counting protocol.
Kitchener HC; Gittins M; Desai M; Smith JH; Cook G; Roberts C; Turnbull L
Health Technol Assess; 2015 Mar; 19(22):i-xix, 1-64. PubMed ID: 25774649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Has the ThinPrep method of cervical screening maintained its improvement over conventional smears in terms of specimen adequacy?
Treacy A; Reynolds J; Kay EW; Leader M; Grace A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Apr; 37(4):239-40. PubMed ID: 19217033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Improvement of diagnostic accuracy and screening conditions with liquid-based cytology.
Schledermann D; Ejersbo D; Hoelund B
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Nov; 34(11):780-5. PubMed ID: 17041948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. High-grade cervical abnormalities and screening intervals in New South Wales, Australia.
Schindeler S; Morrell S; Zuo Y; Baker D
J Med Screen; 2008; 15(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18416954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of BD Surepath and ThinPrep Pap systems in the processing of mucus-rich specimens.
Kenyon S; Sweeney BJ; Happel J; Marchilli GE; Weinstein B; Schneider D
Cancer Cytopathol; 2010 Oct; 118(5):244-9. PubMed ID: 21113923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Specimen adequacy and the ThinPrep Pap Test: the endocervical component.
Selvaggi SM; Guidos BJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Jul; 23(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 10907927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Liquid-based preparations versus conventional cytology: specimen adequacy and diagnostic agreement in oral lesions.
Hayama FH; Motta AC; Silva Ade P; Migliari DA
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2005; 10(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 15735543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accurate assessment of cell density in low cellular liquid-based cervical cytology.
Siebers AG; van der Laak JA; Huberts-Manders R; Vedder JE; Bulten J
Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 22708685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cervical cytology specimen adequacy: patient management guidelines and optimizing specimen collection.
Davey DD; Cox JT; Austin RM; Birdsong G; Colgan TJ; Howell LP; Husain M; Darragh TM
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2008 Apr; 12(2):71-81. PubMed ID: 18369299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparative study: conventional cervical and ThinPrep Pap tests in a routine clinical setting.
Grace A; McBrearty P; Troost S; Thornhill M; Kay E; Leader M
Cytopathology; 2002 Aug; 13(4):200-5. PubMed ID: 12269892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
