185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18044998)
1. Sural nerve grafting in robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: interim report.
Mikhail AA; Song DH; Zorn KC; Orvieto MA; Taxy JB; Lin SP; Mendiola FP; Shalhav AL; Zagaja GP
J Endourol; 2007 Dec; 21(12):1547-51. PubMed ID: 18044998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term functional and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing sural nerve interposition grafting during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Zorn KC; Bernstein AJ; Gofrit ON; Shikanov SA; Mikhail AA; Song DH; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL
J Endourol; 2008 May; 22(5):1005-12. PubMed ID: 18419333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dissociation of sexual function and sexual bother following autologous sural nerve grafting during radical prostatectomy.
Kuwata Y; Muneuchi G; Igawa HH; Tsukuda F; Inui M; Kakehi Y
Int J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):510-4. PubMed ID: 17593095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is laparoscopic unilateral sural nerve grafting during radical prostatectomy effective in retaining sexual potency?
Porpiglia F; Ragni F; Terrone C; Renard J; Musso F; Grande S; Cracco C; Ghignone G; Scarpa RM
BJU Int; 2005 Jun; 95(9):1267-71. PubMed ID: 15892814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic assisted laparoscopic sural nerve grafting during radical prostatectomy: initial experience.
Kaouk JH; Desai MM; Abreu SC; Papay F; Gill IS
J Urol; 2003 Sep; 170(3):909-12. PubMed ID: 12913728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of unilateral sural nerve graft on recovery of potency and continence following radical prostatectomy: 3-year longitudinal study.
Namiki S; Saito S; Nakagawa H; Sanada T; Yamada A; Arai Y
J Urol; 2007 Jul; 178(1):212-6; discussion 216. PubMed ID: 17499797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two-year outcome of unilateral sural nerve interposition graft after radical prostatectomy.
Sim HG; Kliot M; Lange PH; Ellis WJ; Takayama TK; Yang CC
Urology; 2006 Dec; 68(6):1290-4. PubMed ID: 17141842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bilateral vs unilateral laparoscopic intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of surgical and functional outcomes in 457 patients.
Greco F; Hoda MR; Wagner S; Reichelt O; Inferrera A; Magno C; Fornara P
BJU Int; 2011 Aug; 108(4):583-7. PubMed ID: 21091973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of outcomes between pure laparoscopic vs robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a study of comparative effectiveness based upon validated quality of life outcomes.
Willis DL; Gonzalgo ML; Brotzman M; Feng Z; Trock B; Su LM
BJU Int; 2012 Mar; 109(6):898-905. PubMed ID: 21933328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Trabulsi EJ; Zola JC; Colon-Herdman A; Heckman JE; Gomella LG; Lallas CD
Arch Esp Urol; 2011 Oct; 64(8):823-9. PubMed ID: 22052763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-year outcomes of recovery of erectile function after open radical prostatectomy with sural nerve grafting.
Siddiqui KM; Billia M; Mazzola CR; Alzahrani A; Brock GB; Scilley C; Chin JL
J Sex Med; 2014 Aug; 11(8):2119-24. PubMed ID: 24903070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: first 100 patients with one year of follow-up.
Mikhail AA; Orvieto MA; Billatos ES; Zorn KC; Gong EM; Brendler CB; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL
Urology; 2006 Dec; 68(6):1275-9. PubMed ID: 17169649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized phase II trial evaluation of erectile function after attempted unilateral cavernous nerve-sparing retropubic radical prostatectomy with versus without unilateral sural nerve grafting for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Davis JW; Chang DW; Chevray P; Wang R; Shen Y; Wen S; Pettaway CA; Pisters LL; Swanson DA; Madsen LT; Huber N; Troncoso P; Babaian RJ; Wood CG
Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1135-43. PubMed ID: 18783876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Men with low preoperative sexual function may benefit from nerve sparing radical prostatectomy.
Harris CR; Punnen S; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2013 Sep; 190(3):981-6. PubMed ID: 23410984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cavernous nerve reconstruction to preserve erectile function following non-nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy: a prospective study.
Chang DW; Wood CG; Kroll SS; Youssef AA; Babaian RJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Mar; 111(3):1174-81. PubMed ID: 12621188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Editorial comment on: Randomized phase II trial evaluation of erectile function after attempted unilateral cavernous nerve-sparing retropubic radical prostatectomy with versus without unilateral sural nerve grafting for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Gontero P
Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1144. PubMed ID: 18783874
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Impacting factors for recovery of erectile function within 1 year following robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Ko WJ; Truesdale MD; Hruby GW; Landman J; Badani KK
J Sex Med; 2011 Jun; 8(6):1805-12. PubMed ID: 21426493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preoperative criteria to select patients for bilateral nerve-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Novara G; Ficarra V; D'Elia C; Secco S; De Gobbi A; Cavalleri S; Artibani W
J Sex Med; 2010 Feb; 7(2 Pt 1):839-45. PubMed ID: 19912486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pathological confirmation of nerve-sparing types performed during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Ko WJ; Hruby GW; Turk AT; Landman J; Badani KK
BJU Int; 2013 Mar; 111(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 22900712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Editorial comment on: Randomized phase II trial evaluation of erectile function after attempted unilateral cavernous nerve-sparing retropubic radical prostatectomy with versus without unilateral sural nerve grafting for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Eden CG
Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1143. PubMed ID: 18783871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
