185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18044998)
41. Bladder neck contracture after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: evaluation of incidence and risk factors and impact on urinary function.
Msezane LP; Reynolds WS; Gofrit ON; Shalhav AL; Zagaja GP; Zorn KC
J Endourol; 2008 Feb; 22(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 18095861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Optimal strategy for penile rehabilitation after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy based on preoperative erectile function.
Basal S; Wambi C; Acikel C; Gupta M; Badani K
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):658-65. PubMed ID: 23186312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at Siriraj Hospital.
Srinualnad S; Nualyong C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Apr; 90(4):730-6. PubMed ID: 17487128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: what is the optimal procedure for the surgical margins? A single center experience.
Koutlidis N; Mourey E; Champigneulle J; Mangin P; Cormier L
Int J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(12):1076-81. PubMed ID: 22860572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Nerve-sparing approach during radical prostatectomy is strongly associated with the rate of postoperative urinary continence recovery.
Suardi N; Moschini M; Gallina A; Gandaglia G; Abdollah F; Capitanio U; Bianchi M; Tutolo M; Passoni N; Salonia A; Hedlund P; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):717-22. PubMed ID: 22726993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Prospective evaluation of short-term impact and recovery of health related quality of life in men undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical prostatectomy.
Miller J; Smith A; Kouba E; Wallen E; Pruthi RS
J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):854-8; discussion 859. PubMed ID: 17631338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Nerve grafting at the time of radical prostatectomy: should we be doing it?
Mancuso P; Rashid P
ANZ J Surg; 2008 Oct; 78(10):859-63. PubMed ID: 18959637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Functional outcomes and oncological efficacy of Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy with Veil of Aphrodite nerve-sparing: an analysis of 154 consecutive patients.
Kaul S; Savera A; Badani K; Fumo M; Bhandari A; Menon M
BJU Int; 2006 Mar; 97(3):467-72. PubMed ID: 16469009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in 2013.
Ali A; Nguyen DP; Tewari A
Minerva Chir; 2013 Oct; 68(5):499-512. PubMed ID: 24101007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Erectile function following unilateral cavernosal nerve replacement.
Hanson GR; Borden LS; Backous DD; Bayles SW; Corman JM
Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):3990-3. PubMed ID: 18405447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Efficacy of unilateral nerve sparing in radical perineal prostatectomy.
Brehmer B; Kirschner-Hermanns R; Donner A; Reineke T; Knüchel-Clarke R; Jakse G
Urol Int; 2005; 74(4):308-14. PubMed ID: 15897694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective single surgeon randomized comparative study.
Akand M; Erdogru T; Avci E; Ates M
Int J Urol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):916-21. PubMed ID: 26212891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Health-related quality of life evaluation in patients undergoing cavernous nerve reconstruction during radical prostatectomy.
Sugimoto M; Tsunemori H; Kakehi Y
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2009 Oct; 39(10):671-6. PubMed ID: 19654133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Nerve-sparing techniques in open and laparoscopic prostatectomy.
Rodriguez E; Melamud O; Ahlering TE
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2008 Mar; 8(3):475-9. PubMed ID: 18366294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Pretreatment expectations of patients undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic or open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Schroeck FR; Krupski TL; Stewart SB; Bañez LL; Gerber L; Albala DM; Moul JW
J Urol; 2012 Mar; 187(3):894-8. PubMed ID: 22245326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparisons of the perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes after robot-assisted versus pure extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Ploussard G; de la Taille A; Moulin M; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; Salomon L
Eur Urol; 2014 Mar; 65(3):610-9. PubMed ID: 23245815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Beyond the learning curve of the Retzius-sparing approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of the first 200 patients with ≥ 1 year of follow-up.
Galfano A; Di Trapani D; Sozzi F; Strada E; Petralia G; Bramerio M; Ascione A; Gambacorta M; Bocciardi AM
Eur Urol; 2013 Dec; 64(6):974-80. PubMed ID: 23856036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. End-to-side Somatic-to-autonomic Nerve Grafting to Restore Erectile Function and Improve Quality of Life After Radical Prostatectomy.
Reece JC; Dangerfield DC; Coombs CJ
Eur Urol; 2019 Aug; 76(2):189-196. PubMed ID: 30955973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Assessment of required nodal yield in a high risk cohort undergoing extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy and its impact on functional outcomes.
Sagalovich D; Calaway A; Srivastava A; Sooriakumaran P; Tewari AK
BJU Int; 2013 Jan; 111(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 22823452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
