201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18045569)
1. Glaucoma probability score vs Moorfields classification in normal, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous eyes.
Moreno-Montañés J; Antón A; García N; Mendiluce L; Ayala E; Sebastián A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):360-368. PubMed ID: 18045569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploring the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 diagnostic accuracy across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study.
Oddone F; Centofanti M; Rossetti L; Iester M; Fogagnolo P; Capris E; Manni G
Ophthalmology; 2008 Aug; 115(8):1358-65, 1365.e1-3. PubMed ID: 18321579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sector-based analysis with the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study.
Oddone F; Centofanti M; Iester M; Rossetti L; Fogagnolo P; Michelessi M; Capris E; Manni G
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1106-11.e1-3. PubMed ID: 19376590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic ability of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 classifications: glaucoma probability score versus Moorfields regression analysis.
Ferreras A; Pajarín AB; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Honrubia FM
Ophthalmology; 2007 Nov; 114(11):1981-7. PubMed ID: 17445899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic accuracy of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph III classifications in a Turkish primary open-angle glaucoma population.
Bozkurt B; Irkec M; Arslan U
Acta Ophthalmol; 2010 Feb; 88(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 19681791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness values using Stratus Optical Coherence Tomography and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph-III.
Moreno-Montañés J; Antón A; García N; Olmo N; Morilla A; Fallon M
J Glaucoma; 2009 Sep; 18(7):528-34. PubMed ID: 19745667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated analysis of heidelberg retina tomograph optic disc images by glaucoma probability score.
Coops A; Henson DB; Kwartz AJ; Artes PH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5348-55. PubMed ID: 17122123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic ability of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 for glaucoma.
Ferreras A; Pablo LE; Pajarín AB; Larrosa JM; Polo V; Pueyo V
Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):354-359. PubMed ID: 18078851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between discriminant analysis models and "glaucoma probability score" for the detection of glaucomatous optic nerve head changes.
Iester M; Perdicchi A; Capris E; Siniscalco A; Calabria G; Recupero SM
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 18854729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Discriminating between normal and glaucoma-damaged eyes with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3.
Ferreras A; Pablo LE; Larrosa JM; Polo V; Pajarín AB; Honrubia FM
Ophthalmology; 2008 May; 115(5):775-781.e2. PubMed ID: 17870171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. HRT III glaucoma probability score and Moorfields regression across the glaucoma spectrum.
Reddy S; Xing D; Arthur SN; Harizman N; Dorairaj S; Ritch R; Liebmann JM
J Glaucoma; 2009; 18(5):368-72. PubMed ID: 19525726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting progression to glaucoma in ocular hypertensive patients.
Strouthidis NG; Gardiner SK; Owen VM; Zuniga C; Garway-Heath DF
J Glaucoma; 2010; 19(5):304-9. PubMed ID: 19730117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of data analysis tools for detection of glaucoma with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph.
Ford BA; Artes PH; McCormick TA; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Ophthalmology; 2003 Jun; 110(6):1145-50. PubMed ID: 12799239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensitivity and specificity of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II Version 3.0 in a population-based study: the Tajimi Study.
Saito H; Tsutsumi T; Araie M; Tomidokoro A; Iwase A
Ophthalmology; 2009 Oct; 116(10):1854-61. PubMed ID: 19660814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of quantitative imaging devices and subjective optic nerve head assessment by general ophthalmologists to differentiate normal from glaucomatous eyes.
Vessani RM; Moritz R; Batis L; Zagui RB; Bernardoni S; Susanna R
J Glaucoma; 2009 Mar; 18(3):253-61. PubMed ID: 19295383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of early glaucoma with optical coherence tomography (StratusOCT).
Nouri-Mahdavi K; Nikkhou K; Hoffman DC; Law SK; Caprioli J
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 18414102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Regional correlation of structure and function in glaucoma, using the Disc Damage Likelihood Scale, Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, and visual fields.
Danesh-Meyer HV; Ku JY; Papchenko TL; Jayasundera T; Hsiang JC; Gamble GD
Ophthalmology; 2006 Apr; 113(4):603-11. PubMed ID: 16483660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity of screening for glaucomatous optic nerve damage using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II) in high-risk populations: a pilot study.
Harasymowycz PJ; Papamatheakis DG; Fansi AK; Gresset J; Lesk MR
Ophthalmology; 2005 Dec; 112(12):2164-71. PubMed ID: 16325710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
