147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18047404)
1. [ Improvement of femoral bone-cement adhesion in cemented revision hip arthroplasty by application of an amphiphilic bonder in a dynamic femur expulsion testing in vitro ].
Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Gravius S; Wirtz DC; Marx R; Mumme T
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2007 Dec; 52(6):391-7. PubMed ID: 18047404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Application of an amphiphilic bonder in a goat model to increase the femoral cement-bone adhesion in cemented hip arthroplasty].
Müller-Rath R; Wirtz D; Andereya S; Gravius S; Hermanns-Sachweh B; Marx R; Mumme T
Z Orthop Unfall; 2007; 145(4):476-82. PubMed ID: 17912668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture load for periprosthetic femoral fractures in cemented versus uncemented hip stems: an experimental in vitro study.
Thomsen MN; Jakubowitz E; Seeger JB; Lee C; Kretzer JP; Clarius M
Orthopedics; 2008 Jul; 31(7):653. PubMed ID: 19292385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Periprosthetic fractures of the hip].
Weissinger M; Helmreich C; Pöll G
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Jun; 76(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 19595278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Cemented versus cementless revision femoral stems using morselized allograft--a prospective, randomized study with 5 years follow-up].
Nesse E; Nielsen EW; Bastian D
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(6):678-83. PubMed ID: 14679434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Partially cemented AncaDualFit hip stems do not fail in simulated active patients.
Cristofolini L; Erani P; Teutonico AS; Traina F; Viceconti M; Toni A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Feb; 22(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 17070631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Mechanical bending strength of explanted ex vivo bone cements compared with in vitro samples].
Gravius S; Wirtz DC; Marx R; Maus U; Andereya S; Müller-Rath R; Mumme T
Z Orthop Unfall; 2008; 146(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 18324590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Amphiphilic bonder improves adhesion at the acrylic bone cement-bone interface of cemented acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty: in vivo tests in an ovine model.
Müller-Rath R; Wirtz DC; Siebert CH; Andereya S; Gravius S; Hermanns-Sachweh B; Marx R; Mumme T
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Jul; 128(7):701-7. PubMed ID: 17653560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
Mumme T; Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Wirtz DC
Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of proximal stem geometry and surface finish on the fixation of a double-tapered cemented femoral stem.
Sangiorgio SN; Longjohn DB; Dorr LD; Ebramzadeh E
J Biomech; 2011 Jan; 44(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 20828697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do unloading periods affect migration characteristics of cemented femoral components? An in vitro evaluation with the Exeter stem.
Verdonschot N; Barink M; Stolk J; Gardeniers JW; Schreurs BW
Acta Orthop Belg; 2002 Oct; 68(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 12415936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mode of loosening of matt-finished femoral stems in primary total hip replacement.
Behairy YM; Harris WH
Saudi Med J; 2002 Oct; 23(10):1187-94. PubMed ID: 12436120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Personal experience with the Wagner revision stem in hip joint reoperations].
Cech O; Stehlík J; Krbec M; Vrecion V
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(3):148-61. PubMed ID: 11706537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Should monobloc cemented stems be systematically revised during revision total hip arthroplasty? A prospective evaluation].
Grosjean G; Courpied JP; Moindreau M; Hunou N; Mathieu M; Hamadouche M
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Nov; 94(7):670-7. PubMed ID: 18984124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conus hip prosthesis.
Wagner H; Wagner M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(4):213-21. PubMed ID: 11706545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro cyclic testing of the Exeter stem after cement within cement revision.
Wilson LJ; Bell CG; Weinrauch P; Crawford R
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):789-94. PubMed ID: 18534400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of stem length on mechanics of the femoral hip component after cemented revision.
Mann KA; Ayers DC; Damron TA
J Orthop Res; 1997 Jan; 15(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 9066528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
