These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18047482)

  • 1. Novelty and conflict in the categorization of complex stimuli.
    Folstein JR; Van Petten C; Rose SA
    Psychophysiology; 2008 May; 45(3):467-79. PubMed ID: 18047482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The rapid distraction of attentional resources toward the source of incongruent stimulus input during multisensory conflict.
    Donohue SE; Todisco AE; Woldorff MG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Apr; 25(4):623-35. PubMed ID: 23249355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. After the P3: late executive processes in stimulus categorization.
    Folstein JR; van Petten C
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Jun; 48(6):825-41. PubMed ID: 20946130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tracking dynamic adjustments to decision making and performance monitoring processes in conflict tasks.
    Feuerriegel D; Jiwa M; Turner WF; Andrejević M; Hester R; Bode S
    Neuroimage; 2021 Sep; 238():118265. PubMed ID: 34146710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ingroup categorization and response conflict: Interactive effects of target race, flanker compatibility, and infrequency on N2 amplitude.
    Dickter CL; Bartholow BD
    Psychophysiology; 2010 May; 47(3):596-601. PubMed ID: 20136734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conflict adaptation and sequential trial effects: support for the conflict monitoring theory.
    Clayson PE; Larson MJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1953-61. PubMed ID: 21435347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner.
    Gonzalez-Rosa JJ; Inuggi A; Blasi V; Cursi M; Annovazzi P; Comi G; Falini A; Leocani L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23664841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An ERP investigation of task switching using a flanker paradigm.
    Umebayashi K; Okita T
    Brain Res; 2010 Jul; 1346():165-73. PubMed ID: 20573600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptation to emotional conflict: evidence from a novel face emotion paradigm.
    Clayson PE; Larson MJ
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e75776. PubMed ID: 24073278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cognitive conflict increases processing of negative, task-irrelevant stimuli.
    Ligeza TS; Wyczesany M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Oct; 120():126-135. PubMed ID: 28757233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stroop N450 reflects both stimulus conflict and response conflict.
    Huang B; Chen C
    Neuroreport; 2020 Aug; 31(12):851-856. PubMed ID: 32453024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of aging on conflict detection.
    Lucci G; Berchicci M; Spinelli D; Taddei F; Di Russo F
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e56566. PubMed ID: 23418584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visuomotor Correlates of Conflict Expectation in the Context of Motor Decisions.
    Derosiere G; Klein PA; Nozaradan S; Zénon A; Mouraux A; Duque J
    J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(44):9486-9504. PubMed ID: 30201772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flanker task with equiprobable congruent and incongruent conditions does not elicit the conflict N2.
    Kałamała P; Szewczyk J; Senderecka M; Wodniecka Z
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Feb; 55(2):. PubMed ID: 28845513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of repetition priming on electrophysiological and behavioral indices of conflict adaptation and cognitive control.
    Clayson PE; Larson MJ
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Dec; 48(12):1621-30. PubMed ID: 21806636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Novelty detection is enhanced when attention is otherwise engaged: an event-related potential study.
    Schomaker J; Meeter M
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Mar; 232(3):995-1011. PubMed ID: 24402203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ERP Evidence for Implicit Priming of Top-Down Control of Attention.
    Blais C; Hubbard E; Mangun GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 May; 28(5):763-72. PubMed ID: 26765945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural correlates of audiovisual integration of semantic category information.
    Hu Z; Zhang R; Zhang Q; Liu Q; Li H
    Brain Lang; 2012 Apr; 121(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 22330797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Beware misleading cues: perceptual similarity modulates the N2/P3 complex.
    Azizian A; Freitas AL; Parvaz MA; Squires NK
    Psychophysiology; 2006 May; 43(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 16805863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stimulus complexity effects on the event-related potentials to task-irrelevant stimuli.
    Barkaszi I; Czigler I; Balázs L
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Sep; 94(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 23702457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.