These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18048315)
1. Phylogenies scores for exhaustive searches and parsimony scores searches. Carroll HD; Ridge PG; Clement MJ; Snell QO Int J Bioinform Res Appl; 2007; 3(4):493-503. PubMed ID: 18048315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterization of multiple sequence alignment errors using complete-likelihood score and position-shift map. Ezawa K BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Mar; 17():133. PubMed ID: 26992851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayesian coestimation of phylogeny and sequence alignment. Lunter G; Miklós I; Drummond A; Jensen JL; Hein J BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():83. PubMed ID: 15804354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A generalized affine gap model significantly improves protein sequence alignment accuracy. Zachariah MA; Crooks GE; Holbrook SR; Brenner SE Proteins; 2005 Feb; 58(2):329-38. PubMed ID: 15562515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. PRec-I-DCM3: a parallel framework for fast and accurate large-scale phylogeny reconstruction. Dotsenko Y; Coarfa C; Nakhleh L; Mellor-Crummey J; Roshan U Int J Bioinform Res Appl; 2006; 2(4):407-19. PubMed ID: 18048181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A configuration space of homologous proteins conserving mutual information and allowing a phylogeny inference based on pair-wise Z-score probabilities. Bastien O; Ortet P; Roy S; Maréchal E BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 6():49. PubMed ID: 15757521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating the performance of a successive-approximations approach to parameter optimization in maximum-likelihood phylogeny estimation. Sullivan J; Abdo Z; Joyce P; Swofford DL Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Jun; 22(6):1386-92. PubMed ID: 15758203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Parsimony accelerated maximum likelihood searches. Sundberg K; O'Connor T; Carroll H; Clement M; Snell Q Int J Comput Biol Drug Des; 2008; 1(1):74-87. PubMed ID: 20055002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Maximum-scoring segment sets. Csurös M IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2004; 1(4):139-50. PubMed ID: 17051696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An information theoretic approach to macromolecular modeling: I. Sequence alignments. Aynechi T; Kuntz ID Biophys J; 2005 Nov; 89(5):2998-3007. PubMed ID: 16254389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evolutionary models for insertions and deletions in a probabilistic modeling framework. Rivas E BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 6():63. PubMed ID: 15780137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimating trees from filtered data: identifiability of models for morphological phylogenetics. Allman ES; Holder MT; Rhodes JA J Theor Biol; 2010 Mar; 263(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 20004210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rate-variation need not defeat phylogenetic inference through pairwise sequence comparisons. Wu J; Susko E J Theor Biol; 2010 Apr; 263(4):587-9. PubMed ID: 20043922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Determination of optimal parameters of MAFFT program based on BAliBASE3.0 database. Long H; Li M; Fu H Springerplus; 2016; 5(1):736. PubMed ID: 27376004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phylogeny-aware alignment with PRANK. Löytynoja A Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1079():155-70. PubMed ID: 24170401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Statistics of local multiple alignments. Prakash A; Tompa M Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21 Suppl 1():i344-50. PubMed ID: 15961477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Selection of models of DNA evolution with jModelTest. Posada D Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 537():93-112. PubMed ID: 19378141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Maximum parsimony for tree mixtures. Grünewald S; Moulton V IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2009; 6(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 19179702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]