These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18048318)

  • 1. Conservative adjustment of permutation p-values when the number of permutations is limited.
    Lai Y
    Int J Bioinform Res Appl; 2007; 3(4):536-46. PubMed ID: 18048318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two-part permutation tests for DNA methylation and microarray data.
    Neuhäuser M; Boes T; Jöckel KH
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():35. PubMed ID: 15725357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data.
    Xie Y; Pan W; Khodursky AB
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4280-8. PubMed ID: 16188930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Construction of null statistics in permutation-based multiple testing for multi-factorial microarray experiments.
    Gao X
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jun; 22(12):1486-94. PubMed ID: 16574697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
    Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating p-values in small microarray experiments.
    Yang H; Churchill G
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 17077100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robust estimation of the false discovery rate.
    Pounds S; Cheng C
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Aug; 22(16):1979-87. PubMed ID: 16777905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies.
    Ploner A; Calza S; Gusnanto A; Pawitan Y
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(5):556-65. PubMed ID: 16368770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robust detection of periodic time series measured from biological systems.
    Ahdesmäki M; Lähdesmäki H; Pearson R; Huttunen H; Yli-Harja O
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 6():117. PubMed ID: 15892890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A statistical method for the conservative adjustment of false discovery rate (q-value).
    Lai Y
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Mar; 18(Suppl 3):69. PubMed ID: 28361675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sample size determination for the false discovery rate.
    Pounds S; Cheng C
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4263-71. PubMed ID: 16204346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Moment based gene set tests.
    Larson JL; Owen AB
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Apr; 16():132. PubMed ID: 25928861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improved estimation of the noncentrality parameter distribution from a large number of t-statistics, with applications to false discovery rate estimation in microarray data analysis.
    Qu L; Nettleton D; Dekkers JC
    Biometrics; 2012 Dec; 68(4):1178-87. PubMed ID: 22551000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ExactFDR: exact computation of false discovery rate estimate in case-control association studies.
    Wojcik J; Forner K
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 24(20):2407-8. PubMed ID: 18662924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating the proportion of equivalently expressed genes in microarray data based on transformed test statistics.
    Jiao S; Zhang S
    J Comput Biol; 2010 Feb; 17(2):177-87. PubMed ID: 20078228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of false discovery rate using sequential permutation p-values.
    Bancroft T; Du C; Nettleton D
    Biometrics; 2013 Mar; 69(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 23379645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sample size for FDR-control in microarray data analysis.
    Jung SH
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(14):3097-104. PubMed ID: 15845654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of oligonucleotide array experiments with repeated measures using mixed models.
    Li H; Wood CL; Getchell TV; Getchell ML; Stromberg AJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Dec; 5():209. PubMed ID: 15626348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A statistical approach for array CGH data analysis.
    Picard F; Robin S; Lavielle M; Vaisse C; Daudin JJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():27. PubMed ID: 15705208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of normalization on the correlation structure of microarray data.
    Qiu X; Brooks AI; Klebanov L; Yakovlev N
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 6():120. PubMed ID: 15904488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.