223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18048870)
1. A critical analysis of measurements used to assess and manage scars.
Roques C; Teot L
Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2007 Dec; 6(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 18048870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How to assess postsurgical scars: a review of outcome measures.
Vercelli S; Ferriero G; Sartorio F; Stissi V; Franchignoni F
Disabil Rehabil; 2009; 31(25):2055-63. PubMed ID: 19888834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Colour evaluation in scars: tristimulus colorimeter, narrow-band simple reflectance meter or subjective evaluation?
Draaijers LJ; Tempelman FR; Botman YA; Kreis RW; Middelkoop E; van Zuijlen PP
Burns; 2004 Mar; 30(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15019115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale for evaluation of facial scars treated with self-drying silicone gel.
Bianchi FA; Roccia F; Fiorini P; Berrone S
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):719-23. PubMed ID: 20485035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Skin scar preconceptions must be challenged: importance of self-perception in skin scarring.
Brown BC; Moss TP; McGrouther DA; Bayat A
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Jun; 63(6):1022-9. PubMed ID: 19501559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How to assess scar hypertrophy--a comparison of subjective scales and Spectrocutometry: a new objective method.
Kaartinen IS; Välisuo PO; Bochko V; Alander JT; Kuokkanen HO
Wound Repair Regen; 2011; 19(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 21518084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanics of scars.
Cerda E
J Biomech; 2005 Aug; 38(8):1598-603. PubMed ID: 15958216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The evaluation of a clinical scar scale for porcine burn scars.
Wang XQ; Kravchuk O; Liu PY; Kempf M; Boogaard CV; Lau P; Cuttle L; Mill J; Kimble RM
Burns; 2009 Jun; 35(4):538-46. PubMed ID: 19201543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability testing of a new scar assessment tool, Matching Assessment of Scars and Photographs (MAPS).
Masters M; McMahon M; Svens B
J Burn Care Rehabil; 2005; 26(3):273-84. PubMed ID: 15879752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective randomized evaluation of scar assessment measures.
Brandt MG; Moore CC; Micomonaco D; Fung K; Franklin JH; Yoo J; Doyle PC
Laryngoscope; 2009 May; 119(5):841-5. PubMed ID: 19266588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliable and feasible evaluation of linear scars by the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale.
van de Kar AL; Corion LU; Smeulders MJ; Draaijers LJ; van der Horst CM; van Zuijlen PP
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Aug; 116(2):514-22. PubMed ID: 16079683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative and qualitative dermal change with microfat grafting of facial scars.
Sardesai MG; Moore CC
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Dec; 137(6):868-72. PubMed ID: 18036412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multimodality scar management program.
Widgerow AD; Chait LA; Stals PJ; Stals R; Candy G
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Jul; 33(4):533-43. PubMed ID: 19048338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Standardized assessment of breast cancer surgical scars integrating the Vancouver Scar Scale, Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, and patients' perspectives.
Truong PT; Abnousi F; Yong CM; Hayashi A; Runkel JA; Phillips T; Olivotto IA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Oct; 116(5):1291-9. PubMed ID: 16217470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of scar assessments performed with an integrated skin testing device - the DermaLab Combo(®).
Gankande TU; Duke JM; Danielsen PL; DeJong HM; Wood FM; Wallace HJ
Burns; 2014 Dec; 40(8):1521-9. PubMed ID: 24630817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Objective evaluation of burn and post-surgical scars and the accuracy of subjective scar type judgment.
Wang ZY; Zhang J; Lu SL
Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(24):2517-20. PubMed ID: 19187588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A practical and objective approach to scar colour assessment.
Hallam MJ; McNaught K; Thomas AN; Nduka C
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Oct; 66(10):e271-6. PubMed ID: 23880014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterization and quantification of the skin radiance through new digital image analysis.
Baret M; Bensimon N; Coronel S; Ventura S; Nicolas-Garcia S; Korichi R; Gazano G
Skin Res Technol; 2006 Nov; 12(4):254-60. PubMed ID: 17026656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation.
Draaijers LJ; Tempelman FR; Botman YA; Tuinebreijer WE; Middelkoop E; Kreis RW; van Zuijlen PP
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Jun; 113(7):1960-5; discussion 1966-7. PubMed ID: 15253184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A reliable, non-invasive measurement tool for anisotropy in normal skin and scar tissue.
Verhaegen PD; Res EM; van Engelen A; Middelkoop E; van Zuijlen PP
Skin Res Technol; 2010 Aug; 16(3):325-31. PubMed ID: 20637002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
