These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18048870)
1. A critical analysis of measurements used to assess and manage scars. Roques C; Teot L Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2007 Dec; 6(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 18048870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How to assess postsurgical scars: a review of outcome measures. Vercelli S; Ferriero G; Sartorio F; Stissi V; Franchignoni F Disabil Rehabil; 2009; 31(25):2055-63. PubMed ID: 19888834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Colour evaluation in scars: tristimulus colorimeter, narrow-band simple reflectance meter or subjective evaluation? Draaijers LJ; Tempelman FR; Botman YA; Kreis RW; Middelkoop E; van Zuijlen PP Burns; 2004 Mar; 30(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15019115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale for evaluation of facial scars treated with self-drying silicone gel. Bianchi FA; Roccia F; Fiorini P; Berrone S J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):719-23. PubMed ID: 20485035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Skin scar preconceptions must be challenged: importance of self-perception in skin scarring. Brown BC; Moss TP; McGrouther DA; Bayat A J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Jun; 63(6):1022-9. PubMed ID: 19501559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How to assess scar hypertrophy--a comparison of subjective scales and Spectrocutometry: a new objective method. Kaartinen IS; Välisuo PO; Bochko V; Alander JT; Kuokkanen HO Wound Repair Regen; 2011; 19(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 21518084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanics of scars. Cerda E J Biomech; 2005 Aug; 38(8):1598-603. PubMed ID: 15958216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The evaluation of a clinical scar scale for porcine burn scars. Wang XQ; Kravchuk O; Liu PY; Kempf M; Boogaard CV; Lau P; Cuttle L; Mill J; Kimble RM Burns; 2009 Jun; 35(4):538-46. PubMed ID: 19201543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability testing of a new scar assessment tool, Matching Assessment of Scars and Photographs (MAPS). Masters M; McMahon M; Svens B J Burn Care Rehabil; 2005; 26(3):273-84. PubMed ID: 15879752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective randomized evaluation of scar assessment measures. Brandt MG; Moore CC; Micomonaco D; Fung K; Franklin JH; Yoo J; Doyle PC Laryngoscope; 2009 May; 119(5):841-5. PubMed ID: 19266588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliable and feasible evaluation of linear scars by the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. van de Kar AL; Corion LU; Smeulders MJ; Draaijers LJ; van der Horst CM; van Zuijlen PP Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Aug; 116(2):514-22. PubMed ID: 16079683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative and qualitative dermal change with microfat grafting of facial scars. Sardesai MG; Moore CC Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Dec; 137(6):868-72. PubMed ID: 18036412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Standardized assessment of breast cancer surgical scars integrating the Vancouver Scar Scale, Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, and patients' perspectives. Truong PT; Abnousi F; Yong CM; Hayashi A; Runkel JA; Phillips T; Olivotto IA Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Oct; 116(5):1291-9. PubMed ID: 16217470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of scar assessments performed with an integrated skin testing device - the DermaLab Combo(®). Gankande TU; Duke JM; Danielsen PL; DeJong HM; Wood FM; Wallace HJ Burns; 2014 Dec; 40(8):1521-9. PubMed ID: 24630817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Objective evaluation of burn and post-surgical scars and the accuracy of subjective scar type judgment. Wang ZY; Zhang J; Lu SL Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(24):2517-20. PubMed ID: 19187588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A practical and objective approach to scar colour assessment. Hallam MJ; McNaught K; Thomas AN; Nduka C J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Oct; 66(10):e271-6. PubMed ID: 23880014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterization and quantification of the skin radiance through new digital image analysis. Baret M; Bensimon N; Coronel S; Ventura S; Nicolas-Garcia S; Korichi R; Gazano G Skin Res Technol; 2006 Nov; 12(4):254-60. PubMed ID: 17026656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Draaijers LJ; Tempelman FR; Botman YA; Tuinebreijer WE; Middelkoop E; Kreis RW; van Zuijlen PP Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Jun; 113(7):1960-5; discussion 1966-7. PubMed ID: 15253184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A reliable, non-invasive measurement tool for anisotropy in normal skin and scar tissue. Verhaegen PD; Res EM; van Engelen A; Middelkoop E; van Zuijlen PP Skin Res Technol; 2010 Aug; 16(3):325-31. PubMed ID: 20637002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]