BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18048976)

  • 1. Anaerobic co-digestion of sludge with other organic wastes in small wastewater treatment plants: an economic considerations evaluation.
    Pavan P; Bolzonella D; Battistoni E; Cecchi F
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(10):45-53. PubMed ID: 18048976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anaerobic stabilisation of sludge produced during municipal wastewater treatment by electrocoagulation.
    Hutnan M; Drtil M; Kalina A
    J Hazard Mater; 2006 Apr; 131(1-3):163-9. PubMed ID: 16297548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digestion of sludge and organic waste in the sustainability concept for Malmö, Sweden.
    la Cour Jansen J; Gruvberger C; Hanner N; Aspegren H; Svärd A
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(10):163-9. PubMed ID: 15259951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can a wastewater treatment plant be a powerplant? A case study.
    Schwarzenbeck N; Pfeiffer W; Bomball E
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(10):1555-61. PubMed ID: 18520012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Greenhouse gas production in wastewater treatment: process selection is the major factor.
    Keller J; Hartley K
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):43-8. PubMed ID: 12926668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Thermal hygienization of excess anaerobic sludge: a possible self-sustained application of biogas produced in UASB reactors.
    Borges ES; Godinho VM; Chernicharo CA
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):227-34. PubMed ID: 16459796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Potentials and limits of anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge: energy self-sufficient municipal wastewater treatment plant?
    Jenicek P; Bartacek J; Kutil J; Zabranska J; Dohanyos M
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(6):1277-81. PubMed ID: 22828306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feasibility study for co-digestion of sewage sludge with OFMSW on two wastewater treatment plants in Germany.
    Krupp M; Schubert J; Widmann R
    Waste Manag; 2005; 25(4):393-9. PubMed ID: 15869982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrasound pre-treatment for anaerobic digestion improvement.
    Pérez-Elvira S; Fdz-Polanco M; Plaza FI; Garralón G; Fdz-Polanco F
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(6):1525-32. PubMed ID: 19759455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Co-digestion of organic solid waste and sludge from sewage treatment.
    Edelmann W; Engeli H; Gradenecker M
    Water Sci Technol; 2000; 41(3):213-21. PubMed ID: 11381994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sludge digestion instead of aerobic stabilisation - a cost benefit analysis based on experiences in Germany.
    Gretzschel O; Schmitt TG; Hansen J; Siekmann K; Jakob J
    Water Sci Technol; 2014; 69(2):430-7. PubMed ID: 24473316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Benchmarking of municipal waste water treatment plants (an Austrian project).
    Lindtner S; Kroiss H; Nowak O
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(7):265-71. PubMed ID: 15553485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biological nutrient removal wastewater treatments and sewage sludge anaerobic mesophilic digestion performances.
    Bolzonella D; Innocenti L; Cecchi F
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(10):199-208. PubMed ID: 12479472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimisation of costs by using disintegration at a full-scale anaerobic digestion plant.
    Winter A
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(4-5):405-12. PubMed ID: 12361040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Energy- and CO2-reduction potentials by anaerobic treatment of wastewater and organic kitchen wastes in consideration of different climatic conditions.
    Weichgrebe D; Urban I; Friedrich K
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(2):379-84. PubMed ID: 18701789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of cattle manure with agro-wastes and energy crops: comparison of pilot and full scale experiences.
    Cavinato C; Fatone F; Bolzonella D; Pavan P
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Jan; 101(2):545-50. PubMed ID: 19747821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimization of excess sludge production for biological wastewater treatment.
    Wei Y; Van Houten RT; Borger AR; Eikelboom DH; Fan Y
    Water Res; 2003 Nov; 37(18):4453-67. PubMed ID: 14511716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pilot-scale anaerobic digestion of screenings from wastewater treatment plants.
    Le Hyaric R; Canler JP; Barillon B; Naquin P; Gourdon R
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Dec; 101(23):9006-11. PubMed ID: 20655208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Individual wastewater treatment in Flanders (Belgium).
    Van Tomme I; Pieters J; Verstraete W
    Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol Wet; 2001; 66(3a):205-9. PubMed ID: 15954588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Economic evaluation of sewage treatment processes in India.
    Sato N; Okubo T; Onodera T; Agrawal LK; Ohashi A; Harada H
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Sep; 84(4):447-60. PubMed ID: 16934390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.