These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18049363)

  • 21. Correlation of nuclear cataract lens density using Scheimpflug images with Lens Opacities Classification System III and visual function.
    Grewal DS; Brar GS; Grewal SP
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Aug; 116(8):1436-43. PubMed ID: 19500847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Validation of grading scales for contact lens complications.
    Efron N; Morgan PB; Katsara SS
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2001 Jan; 21(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 11220037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A new scale for the assessment of conjunctival bulbar redness.
    Macchi I; Bunya VY; Massaro-Giordano M; Stone RA; Maguire MG; Zheng Y; Chen M; Gee J; Smith E; Daniel E
    Ocul Surf; 2018 Oct; 16(4):436-440. PubMed ID: 29883738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Grading infantile cataracts.
    Forster JE; Abadi RV; Muldoon M; Lloyd IC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Jul; 26(4):372-9. PubMed ID: 16792736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Application of digital imaging in tooth whitening randomized controlled trials.
    Sagel PA; Gerlach RW
    Am J Dent; 2007 Sep; 20 Spec No A():7A-14A. PubMed ID: 19681252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessment of ocular redness measurements obtained with keratograph 5M and correlation with subjective grading scales.
    Pérez-Bartolomé F; Sanz-Pozo C; Martínez-de la Casa JM; Arriola-Villalobos P; Fernández-Pérez C; García-Feijoó J
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2018 Nov; 41(9):836-846. PubMed ID: 30293826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessing ocular bulbar redness: a comparison of methods.
    Downie LE; Keller PR; Vingrys AJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Mar; 36(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 26890702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Anterior segment measurements using digital photography: a simple technique.
    VanRoekel RC; Bower KS; Burka JM; Howard RS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Jun; 83(6):391-5. PubMed ID: 16772897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of variation in bulbar conjunctival redness, temperature, and blood flow.
    Duench S; Simpson T; Jones LW; Flanagan JG; Fonn D
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jun; 84(6):511-6. PubMed ID: 17568321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Image quality characteristics of a novel colour scanning digital ophthalmoscope (SDO) compared with fundus photography.
    Strauss RW; Krieglstein TR; Priglinger SG; Reis W; Ulbig MW; Kampik A; Neubauer AS
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Nov; 27(6):611-8. PubMed ID: 17956367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Grading static versus dynamic images of contact lens complications.
    Efron N; Chaudry A
    Clin Exp Optom; 2007 Sep; 90(5):361-6. PubMed ID: 17697182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A validated hand grading scale.
    Carruthers A; Carruthers J; Hardas B; Kaur M; Goertelmeyer R; Jones D; Rzany B; Cohen J; Kerscher M; Flynn TC; Maas C; Sattler G; Gebauer A; Pooth R; McClure K; Simone-Korbel U; Buchner L
    Dermatol Surg; 2008 Nov; 34 Suppl 2():S179-83. PubMed ID: 19021677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Shade matching assisted by digital photography and computer software.
    Schropp L
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 19141046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Automated grading system for evaluation of ocular redness associated with dry eye.
    Rodriguez JD; Johnston PR; Ousler GW; Smith LM; Abelson MB
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2013; 7():1197-1204. PubMed ID: 23814457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pentacam tomograms: a novel method for quantification of posterior capsule opacification.
    Grewal D; Jain R; Brar GS; Grewal SP
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 May; 49(5):2004-8. PubMed ID: 18436833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A validated lip fullness grading scale.
    Carruthers A; Carruthers J; Hardas B; Kaur M; Goertelmeyer R; Jones D; Rzany B; Cohen J; Kerscher M; Flynn TC; Maas C; Sattler G; Gebauer A; Pooth R; McClure K; Simone-Korbel U; Buchner L
    Dermatol Surg; 2008 Nov; 34 Suppl 2():S161-6. PubMed ID: 19021674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluating a new objective grading software for conjunctival hyperaemia.
    Huntjens B; Basi M; Nagra M
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2020 Apr; 43(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 31326277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Information loss in 2 bleb grading systems.
    Wells AP; James K; Birchall W; Wong T
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Mar; 16(2):246-50. PubMed ID: 17473739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of subjective grading of limbal redness by eyecare practitioners in three countries.
    Long B
    Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Jul; 35(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 19474752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of ocular surface side effects of topical travoprost and bimatoprost.
    Alagöz G; Bayer A; Boran C; Serin D; Kükner A; Elçioğlu M
    Ophthalmologica; 2008; 222(3):161-7. PubMed ID: 18497524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.