These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1804953)

  • 1. Rigid versus soft foot orthoses. A single subject design.
    McPoil TG; Cornwall MW
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 1991 Dec; 81(12):638-42. PubMed ID: 1804953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of rearfoot posts in reducing forefoot forces. A single-subject design.
    Cornwall MW; McPoil TG
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 1992 Jul; 82(7):371-4. PubMed ID: 1432654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of foot orthoses on transverse tibial rotation during walking.
    McPoil TG; Cornwall MW
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2000 Jan; 90(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 10659526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of forefoot and arch posting orthotic designs on first metatarsophalangeal joint kinematics during gait.
    Nawoczenski DA; Ludewig PM
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2004 Jun; 34(6):317-27. PubMed ID: 15233393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are soft in-soles or orthotics better than no insoles to prevent stress fractures of the lower extremity in adults?
    Zukas R; Sloat N; Wright P
    J Okla State Med Assoc; 2013 Mar; 106(3):81-2. PubMed ID: 23687717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Orthoses posted in both the forefoot and rearfoot reduce moments and angular impulses on lower extremity joints during walking.
    Hsu WH; Lewis CL; Monaghan GM; Saltzman E; Hamill J; Holt KG
    J Biomech; 2014 Aug; 47(11):2618-25. PubMed ID: 24968944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of biomechanical shoe orthoses in tibial stress fracture prevention.
    Ekenman I; Milgrom C; Finestone A; Begin M; Olin C; Arndt T; Burr D
    Am J Sports Med; 2002; 30(6):866-70. PubMed ID: 12435654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prevention of overuse injuries of the foot by improved shoe shock attenuation. A randomized prospective study.
    Milgrom C; Finestone A; Shlamkovitch N; Wosk J; Laor A; Voloshin A; Eldad A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Aug; (281):189-92. PubMed ID: 1354088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of custom and semi-custom foot orthotics on second metatarsal bone strain during dynamic gait simulation.
    Meardon SA; Edwards B; Ward E; Derrick TR
    Foot Ankle Int; 2009 Oct; 30(10):998-1004. PubMed ID: 19796595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of wearing foot orthosis with medial arch support on the fifth metatarsal loading and ankle inversion angle in selected basketball tasks.
    Yu B; Preston JJ; Queen RM; Byram IR; Hardaker WM; Gross MT; Davis JM; Taft TN; Garrett WE
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2007 Apr; 37(4):186-91. PubMed ID: 17469671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of inverted orthoses on lower-extremity mechanics in runners.
    Williams DS; McClay Davis I; Baitch SP
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 Dec; 35(12):2060-8. PubMed ID: 14652503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of foot orthoses on rearfoot complex kinematics during walking gait.
    Nester CJ; Hutchins S; Bowker P
    Foot Ankle Int; 2001 Feb; 22(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 11249223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of soft and semi-rigid orthoses upon rearfoot movement in running.
    Smith LS; Clarke TE; Hamill CL; Santopietro F
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 1986 Apr; 76(4):227-33. PubMed ID: 3701627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of extrinsic rearfoot posts on rearfoot position.
    Blake RL; Ferguson HJ
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 1993 Aug; 83(8):447-56. PubMed ID: 8366433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of cast and noncast foot orthoses on plantar pressure and force during normal gait.
    Redmond A; Lumb PS; Landorf K
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2000 Oct; 90(9):441-9. PubMed ID: 11055169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Orthosis and Foot Structure Affect the Fifth Metatarsal Principal Strains During Simulated Level Walking.
    Hoffman JW; Bitar RC; Williams N; Steineman BD; Sturnick DR; Garrison GW; Demetracopoulos CA; Drakos MC; O'Malley MJ
    Am J Sports Med; 2022 May; 50(6):1659-1667. PubMed ID: 35302902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forefoot-rearfoot coupling patterns and tibial internal rotation during stance phase of barefoot versus shod running.
    Eslami M; Begon M; Farahpour N; Allard P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Jan; 22(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 17049700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long distance running increases plantar pressures beneath the metatarsal heads: a barefoot walking investigation of 200 marathon runners.
    Nagel A; Fernholz F; Kibele C; Rosenbaum D
    Gait Posture; 2008 Jan; 27(1):152-5. PubMed ID: 17276688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of two types of foot orthoses on rearfoot mechanics.
    Brown GP; Donatelli R; Catlin PA; Wooden MJ
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1995 May; 21(5):258-67. PubMed ID: 7787849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of foot orthoses on the kinematics and kinetics of normal walking gait.
    Nester CJ; van der Linden ML; Bowker P
    Gait Posture; 2003 Apr; 17(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 12633779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.