BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18051054)

  • 1. Improving the contrast of breast cancer masses in ultrasound using an autoregressive model based filter.
    von Lavante E; Noble JA
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 1):153-60. PubMed ID: 18051054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How to optimize breast ultrasound.
    Athanasiou A; Tardivon A; Ollivier L; Thibault F; El Khoury C; Neuenschwander S
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 69(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 18818037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of a novel segmentation algorithm on radiologists' diagnosis of breast masses using ultrasound imaging.
    Tian JW; Ning CP; Guo YH; Cheng HD; Tang XL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Jan; 38(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 22104530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diffuse boundary extraction of breast masses on ultrasound by leak plugging.
    Cary TW; Conant EF; Arger PH; Sehgal CM
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3318-28. PubMed ID: 16370419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-aided diagnosis for the classification of breast masses in automated whole breast ultrasound images.
    Moon WK; Shen YW; Huang CS; Chiang LR; Chang RF
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Apr; 37(4):539-48. PubMed ID: 21420580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated 3D ultrasound image segmentation to aid breast cancer image interpretation.
    Gu P; Lee WM; Roubidoux MA; Yuan J; Wang X; Carson PL
    Ultrasonics; 2016 Feb; 65():51-8. PubMed ID: 26547117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative study of automated breast 3-D ultrasound and handheld B-mode ultrasound for differentiation of benign and malignant breast masses.
    Chen L; Chen Y; Diao XH; Fang L; Pang Y; Cheng AQ; Li WP; Wang Y
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1735-42. PubMed ID: 23849390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Segmentation of solid nodules in ultrasonographic breast image based on wavelet transform.
    Park S; Kong HJ; Moon WK; Kim HC
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():5650-3. PubMed ID: 18003294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Learning a structured graphical model with boosted top-down features for ultrasound image segmentation.
    Hao Z; Wang Q; Wang X; Kim JB; Hwang Y; Cho BH; Guo P; Lee WK
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2013; 16(Pt 1):227-34. PubMed ID: 24505670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing different ultrasound imaging methods for breast cancer detection.
    Ozmen N; Dapp R; Zapf M; Gemmeke H; Ruiter NV; van Dongen KW
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Apr; 62(4):637-46. PubMed ID: 25881342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combining low-, high-level and empirical domain knowledge for automated segmentation of ultrasonic breast lesions.
    Madabhushi A; Metaxas DN
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Feb; 22(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 12715992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new automated method for the segmentation and characterization of breast masses on ultrasound images.
    Cui J; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Nees A; Paramagul C; Hadjiiski LM; Zhou C; Shi J
    Med Phys; 2009 May; 36(5):1553-65. PubMed ID: 19544771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
    Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automatic detection of regions of interest in breast ultrasound images based on local phase information.
    Wang X; Guo Y; Wang Y
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S1265-73. PubMed ID: 26405886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Classification of breast masses in ultrasonic B scans using Nakagami and K distributions.
    Shankar PM; Dumane VA; George T; Piccoli CW; Reid JM; Forsberg F; Goldberg BB
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Jul; 48(14):2229-40. PubMed ID: 12894981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-aided detection/diagnosis of breast cancer in mammography and ultrasound: a review.
    Jalalian A; Mashohor SB; Mahmud HR; Saripan MI; Ramli AR; Karasfi B
    Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(3):420-6. PubMed ID: 23153689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chestwall segmentation in 3D breast ultrasound using a deformable volume model.
    Huisman H; Karssemeijer N
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2007; 20():245-56. PubMed ID: 17633704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 3-D visualization and non-linear tissue classification of breast tumors using ultrasound elastography in vivo.
    Sayed A; Layne G; Abraham J; Mukdadi OM
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1490-502. PubMed ID: 24768484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Malignant and benign breast masses on 3D US volumetric images: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologist accuracy.
    Sahiner B; Chan HP; Roubidoux MA; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Paramagul C; Bailey J; Nees AV; Blane C
    Radiology; 2007 Mar; 242(3):716-24. PubMed ID: 17244717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [3D ultrasound (3D US) in the diagnosis of focal breast lesions].
    Kotsianos D; Wirth S; Fischer T; Hiltawsky K; Sittek H; Reiser M
    Radiologe; 2005 Mar; 45(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 15747149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.