These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18051069)
1. Statistical shape modeling using MDL incorporating shape, appearance, and expert knowledge. Ward AD; Hamarneh G Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 1):278-85. PubMed ID: 18051069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating the confidence of statistical model based shape prediction. Blanc R; Syrkina E; Székely G Inf Process Med Imaging; 2009; 21():602-13. PubMed ID: 19694297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mixtures of Gaussians on tensor fields for DT-MRI segmentation. de Luis-García R; Alberola-López C Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 1):319-26. PubMed ID: 18051074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Corpus callosum subdivision based on a probabilistic model of inter-hemispheric connectivity. Styner MA; Oguz I; Smith RG; Cascio C; Jomier M Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 2):765-72. PubMed ID: 16686029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Statistical modeling of shape and appearance using the continuous medial representation. Yushkevich PA; Zhang H; Gee JC Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 2):725-32. PubMed ID: 16686024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new closed-form information metric for shape analysis. Peter A; Rangarajan A Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 1):249-56. PubMed ID: 17354897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Statistical shape models for 3D medical image segmentation: a review. Heimann T; Meinzer HP Med Image Anal; 2009 Aug; 13(4):543-63. PubMed ID: 19525140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Non-parametric surface-based regularisation for building statistical shape models. Twining C; Davies R; Taylor C Inf Process Med Imaging; 2007; 20():738-50. PubMed ID: 17633744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Unsupervised learning of an atlas from unlabeled point-sets. Chui H; Rangarajan A; Zhang J; Morison Leonard C IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2004 Feb; 26(2):160-72. PubMed ID: 15376892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Shape modeling using automatic landmarking. Xie J; Heng PA Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 2):709-16. PubMed ID: 16686022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Shape-based normalization of the corpus callosum for DTI connectivity analysis. Sun H; Yushkevich PA; Zhang H; Cook PA; Duda JT; Simon TJ; Gee JC IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Sep; 26(9):1166-78. PubMed ID: 17896590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of 3D correspondence methods for model building. Styner MA; Rajamani KT; Nolte LP; Zsemlye G; Székely G; Taylor CJ; Davies RH Inf Process Med Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18():63-75. PubMed ID: 15344447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A statistical parts-based model of anatomical variability. Toews M; Arbel T IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Apr; 26(4):497-508. PubMed ID: 17427737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spline-based probabilistic model for anatomical landmark detection. Izard C; Jedynak B; Stark CE Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 1):849-56. PubMed ID: 17354970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Deformable modeling using a 3D boundary representation with quadratic constraints on the branching structure of the Blum skeleton. Yushkevich PA; Zhang HG Inf Process Med Imaging; 2013; 23():280-91. PubMed ID: 24683976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]