These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18051089)

  • 1. Improved statistical TRE model when using a reference frame.
    Wiles AD; Peters TM
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 1):442-9. PubMed ID: 18051089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A statistical model for point-based target registration error with anisotropic fiducial localizer error.
    Wiles AD; Likholyot A; Frantz DD; Peters TM
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Mar; 27(3):378-90. PubMed ID: 18334433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analytic expressions for fiducial and surface target registration error.
    Ma B; Ellis RE
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 2):637-44. PubMed ID: 17354826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy.
    Lavely WC; Scarfone C; Cevikalp H; Li R; Byrne DW; Cmelak AJ; Dawant B; Price RR; Hallahan DE; Fitzpatrick JM
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 15191296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On fiducial target registration error in the presence of anisotropic noise.
    Ma B; Moghari MH; Ellis RE; Abolmaesumi P
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 2):628-35. PubMed ID: 18044621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. General approach to first-order error prediction in rigid point registration.
    Danilchenko A; Fitzpatrick JM
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Mar; 30(3):679-93. PubMed ID: 21075718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rigid-body point-based registration: The distribution of the target registration error when the fiducial registration errors are given.
    Seginer A
    Med Image Anal; 2011 Aug; 15(4):397-413. PubMed ID: 21515088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of image registration accuracy in three-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.
    Karnik VV; Fenster A; Bax J; Cool DW; Gardi L; Gyacskov I; Romagnoli C; Ward AD
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):802-13. PubMed ID: 20229890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic image-to-world registration based on x-ray projections in cone-beam CT-guided interventions.
    Hamming NM; Daly MJ; Irish JC; Siewerdsen JH
    Med Phys; 2009 May; 36(5):1800-12. PubMed ID: 19544799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Real-time estimation of FLE statistics for 3-D tracking with point-based registration.
    Wiles AD; Peters TM
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Sep; 28(9):1384-98. PubMed ID: 19336301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A high-order solution for the distribution of target registration error in rigid-body point-based registration.
    Moghari MH; Abolmaesumi P
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 2):603-11. PubMed ID: 17354822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. General first-order target registration error model considering a coordinate reference frame in an image-guided surgical system.
    Min Z; Meng MQ
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2020 Dec; 58(12):2989-3002. PubMed ID: 33029759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of fiducial configuration on target registration error in intraoperative cone-beam CT guidance of head and neck surgery.
    Hamming NM; Daly MJ; Irish JC; Siewerdsen JH
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():3643-8. PubMed ID: 19163500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A theoretical comparison of different target registration error estimators.
    Moghari MH; Ma B; Abolmaesumi P
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2008; 11(Pt 2):1032-40. PubMed ID: 18982706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictive camera tracking for bronchoscope simulation with CONDensation.
    Deligianni F; Chung A; Yang GZ
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 1):910-6. PubMed ID: 16685933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Image-to-physical registration for image-guided interventions using 3-D ultrasound and an ultrasound imaging model.
    King AP; Ma YL; Yao C; Jansen C; Razavi R; Rhode KS; Penney GP
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2009; 21():188-201. PubMed ID: 19694263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intraoperative patient registration using volumetric true 3D ultrasound without fiducials.
    Ji S; Roberts DW; Hartov A; Paulsen KD
    Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7540-52. PubMed ID: 23231302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. User-interactive registration of bone with A-mode ultrasound.
    Heger S; Portheine F; Ohnsorge JA; Schkommodau E; Radermacher K
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2005; 24(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 15825850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 3-D/2-D registration by integrating 2-D information in 3-D.
    Tomazevic D; Likar B; Pernus F
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Jan; 25(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 16398411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic MRI scan plane control for passive tracking of instruments and devices.
    DiMaio SP; Samset E; Fischer G; Iordachita I; Fichtinger G; Jolesz F; Tempany CM
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 2):50-8. PubMed ID: 18044552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.