BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1805180)

  • 1. Pulpal response to a new light-cured composite placed in etched glass-ionomer lined cavities.
    Hosoda H; Inokoshi S; Shimada Y; Harnirattisai C; Otsuki M
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(4):122-9. PubMed ID: 1805180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pulpal response to a resin-modified glass-ionomer material on nonexposed and exposed monkey pulps.
    Tarim B; Hafez AA; Cox CF
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Aug; 29(8):535-42. PubMed ID: 9807135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biocompatability of compomer restorative systems on nonexposed dental pulps of primate teeth.
    Tarim B; Hafez AA; Suzuki SH; Suzuki S; Cox CF
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(4):149-58. PubMed ID: 9484155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pulp reactions to light-cured glass ionomer cements.
    Gaintantzopoulou MD; Willis GP; Kafrawy AH
    Am J Dent; 1994 Feb; 7(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 9115678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identification of hierarchical factors to guide clinical decision making for successful long-term pulp capping.
    Murray PE; Hafez AA; Smith AJ; Cox CF
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 12674361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pulpal response to a newly developed MMA based resin cement for bonding tooth-colored indirect restorations.
    Seki Y; Shimada Y; Foxton RM; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 17076029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pulp reaction to a tri-cure resin-modified glass ionomer.
    Demirci M; Uçok M; Küçükkeleş N; Soydan N
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Jun; 85(6):712-9. PubMed ID: 9638706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reactionary dentinogenesis after applying restorative materials and bioactive dentin matrix molecules as liners in deep cavities prepared in nonhuman primate teeth.
    Duque C; Hebling J; Smith AJ; Giro EM; Oliveira MF; de Souza Costa CA
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Jun; 33(6):452-61. PubMed ID: 16671993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cavity remaining dentin thickness and pulpal activity.
    Murray PE; About I; Lumley PJ; Franquin JC; Remusat M; Smith AJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 12074229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biocompatibility of a flowable composite bonded with a self-etching adhesive compared with a glass lonomer cement and a high copper amalgam.
    Shimada Y; Seki Y; Sasafuchi Y; Arakawa M; Burrow MF; Otsuki M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 14753328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biocompatibility of a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement applied as pulp capping in human teeth.
    do Nascimento AB; Fontana UF; Teixeira HM; Costa CA
    Am J Dent; 2000 Feb; 13(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 11763899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Histopathology study on pulp response to glass ionomers in human teeth.
    Mousavinasab M; Namazikhah MS; Sarabi N; Jajarm HH; Bidar M; Ghavamnasiri M
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2008 Jan; 36(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 18293762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
    Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Restorative pulpal and repair responses.
    Murray PE; About I; Franquin JC; Remusat M; Smith AJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Apr; 132(4):482-91. PubMed ID: 11315379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Post-operative sensitivity in glass-ionomer versus adhesive resin-lined posterior composites.
    Akpata ES; Sadiq W
    Am J Dent; 2001 Feb; 14(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 11806478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microleakage of glass ionomer cement composite resin and glass ionomer resin cement.
    Erdilek N; Ozata F; Sepetcioglu F
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(4):311-4. PubMed ID: 9484117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biocompatibility of various dental materials: pulp healing with a surface seal.
    Cox CF; Sübay RK; Suzuki S; Suzuki SH; Ostro E
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1996 Jun; 16(3):240-51. PubMed ID: 9084310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The irritant effect of plastic filling materials on the dental pulp].
    Götze W
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1980 Apr; 35(4):486-8. PubMed ID: 6773734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pulpal studies: biocompatibility or effectiveness of marginal seal?
    Kanca J
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Oct; 21(10):775-9. PubMed ID: 2082408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interactions between cavity preparation and restoration events and their effects on pulp vitality.
    Wisithphrom K; Murray PE; About I; Windsor LJ
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Dec; 26(6):596-605. PubMed ID: 17243333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.