440 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18051939)
1. The armchair ethicist: it's all about location.
Diekema DS
J Clin Ethics; 2007; 18(3):227-32, discussion 233-4. PubMed ID: 18051939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Autonomy and the family as (in)appropriate surrogates for DNR decisions: a qualitative analysis of dying cancer patients' talk.
Eliott J; Olver I
J Clin Ethics; 2007; 18(3):206-18. PubMed ID: 18051937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. What families say about surrogacy: a response to "autonomy and the family as (in)appropriate surrogates for DNR decisions".
Nelson JL; Lindemann H
J Clin Ethics; 2007; 18(3):219-26; discussion 233-4. PubMed ID: 18051938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Stumbled, fumbled, bumbled, grumbled, and humbled: looking back at the future history of clinical ethics.
Berger JT
J Clin Ethics; 2014; 25(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 24972059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethics consultation and "facilitated" consensus.
Adams DM
J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 19385322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Substituted judgments in the absence of surrogates.
Sadovnikoff N; Jurchak M
Crit Care Med; 2007 Oct; 35(10):2467-8. PubMed ID: 17885404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Law, bioethics and biomedicine--towards a healthier interaction.
Keyserlingk EW
McGill Law J; 1981; 26(4):1020-35. PubMed ID: 11650587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Commentary on Berger's "Patients' concerns for family burden".
DeRenzo EG
J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(2):168-71. PubMed ID: 19554824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical ethics consultations: reasons for optimism, but problems exist.
Perkins HS
J Clin Ethics; 1992; 3(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 11643065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assigning an appropriate surrogate.
Baumrucker SJ
Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2007; 24(5):422-8. PubMed ID: 17998409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Managing Care of an Intrapartum Patient with Agitation and Psychosis: Ethical and Legal Implications.
McCullough LB; Chervenak FA; Coverdale JH
AMA J Ethics; 2016 Mar; 18(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 27002991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The practice of autonomy and the practice of bioethics.
Schneider CE
J Clin Ethics; 2002; 13(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 12235687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Memory identity and capacity.
Spike JP
J Clin Ethics; 2007; 18(3):252-5. PubMed ID: 18051943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Surrogate medical decision making on behalf of a never-competent, profoundly intellectually disabled patient who is acutely ill.
Venkat A
J Clin Ethics; 2012; 23(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 22462387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating outcomes in ethics consultation research.
Fox E; Arnold RM
J Clin Ethics; 1996; 7(2):127-38. PubMed ID: 8889888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. When I lay my burden down: commentary on Berger.
Derse AR
J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(2):172-4. PubMed ID: 19554825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Collective moral imagination: making decisions for persons with dementia.
Gedge EB
J Med Philos; 2004 Aug; 29(4):435-50. PubMed ID: 15370303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethics in the Setting of Burned Patients.
Vercler CJ; Hultman CS
Clin Plast Surg; 2017 Oct; 44(4):903-909. PubMed ID: 28888315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is bioethics broke?: on the idea of ethics and law "catching up" with technology.
Shapiro MH
Indiana Law Rev; 1999; 33(1):17-162. PubMed ID: 12680378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Saturday morning postmortem.
Lantos JD
Hastings Cent Rep; 2010; 40(2):5-6; author reply 6. PubMed ID: 20391842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
