BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

543 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18053012)

  • 1. Consensus statements, evidence-based medicine and guidelines in allergic diseases.
    Bousquet J; Bieber T; Fokkens W; Humbert M; Kowalski ML; Niggemann B; Simon HU; Schünemann H
    Allergy; 2008 Jan; 63(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 18053012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality of professional society guidelines and consensus conference statements in critical care.
    Sinuff T; Patel RV; Adhikari NK; Meade MO; Schünemann HJ; Cook DJ
    Crit Care Med; 2008 Apr; 36(4):1049-58. PubMed ID: 18379228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [From consensus to CBO guideline].
    van Everdingen JJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Oct; 143(42):2086-9. PubMed ID: 10560556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guidelines, clinical practice recommendations, position papers and consensus statements: definition, preparation, role and application.
    Ingravallo F; Dietrich CF; Gilja OH; Piscaglia F
    Ultraschall Med; 2014 Oct; 35(5):395-9. PubMed ID: 25317551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [New guidelines put their faith in European standards. Not rigid instruction but guiding principle].
    Aumiller J
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2006 Feb; 148(7):41, 43-4. PubMed ID: 16529362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A critical appraisal of 'evidence-based medicine' in allergy and asthma.
    Bousquet J; Van Cauwenberge P
    Allergy; 2004 Aug; 59 Suppl 78():12-20. PubMed ID: 15245351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The Guideline Manual. Development and implementation of guidelines in medicine].
    Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften & Arztlichen Zentralstelle Qualitätssicherung
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2001 Jan; 95 Suppl 1():1-84. PubMed ID: 11233512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In the current era of evidence-based guidelines, do consensus-based guidelines still have a place?
    Waclawski ER; Madan I
    Occup Med (Lond); 2005 Aug; 55(5):343-4. PubMed ID: 16040767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Consensus conferences and guidelines in gastroenterology: an illusion].
    Creutzfeldt W
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1999 Apr; 129(16):613-8. PubMed ID: 10378244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Possibilities for transborder cooperation in breast cancer care in Europe: a comparative analysis regarding the content, quality and evidence use of breast cancer guidelines.
    Wennekes L; Hermens RP; van Heumen K; Runde V; Schoelen H; Wollersheim HC; Grol RP; de Mulder PH; Ottevanger PB
    Breast; 2008 Oct; 17(5):464-71. PubMed ID: 18455399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Guideline implementation: why don't we do it?
    Solberg LI
    Am Fam Physician; 2002 Jan; 65(2):176, 181-2. PubMed ID: 11820484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comment on the Schmiegel et al. contribution--Z Gastroenterol 2004: 1129-1177].
    Junginger T
    Z Gastroenterol; 2005 Apr; 43(4):418; author reply 419. PubMed ID: 15830300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical guidelines: quality and implementation.
    Mäkelä M
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2006; 100(7):526-30. PubMed ID: 17137066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Guideline development for general medicine: the problem of dichotomized algorithm development].
    Niederstadt CJ; Doering TJ; Fischer GC
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2001 Aug; 95(8):561-6. PubMed ID: 11575140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Guidelines in surgery: from the viewpoint of clinical research].
    Lorenz W
    Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd; 1997; 114():61-7. PubMed ID: 9574098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Acute backache guideline clearing process. Methodology and results of formal evaluation].
    Thomeczek C; Lampert U; Brune K; Hasenbring M; Krämer J; Niebling W; Raspe H; Stäbler A; Steudel WI; Willburger RE; Zeilhofer HU; Kirchner H; Ollenschläger G;
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 12647734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: Part 2 of 3. The GRADE approach to grading quality of evidence about diagnostic tests and strategies.
    Brozek JL; Akl EA; Jaeschke R; Lang DM; Bossuyt P; Glasziou P; Helfand M; Ueffing E; Alonso-Coello P; Meerpohl J; Phillips B; Horvath AR; Bousquet J; Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ;
    Allergy; 2009 Aug; 64(8):1109-16. PubMed ID: 19489757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NICE guidance, but who does the work?
    Peel DN
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2011 Feb; 23(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20951013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The AGREE Instrument is a practical method for the assessment of clinical guidelines. Quality check of guidelines for asthma/allergy and diabetes in Ostergotland].
    Lindberg M; Schöld AK; Ostgren CJ; Tilling B; Tunér K
    Lakartidningen; 2005 Oct 10-16; 102(41):2942, 2944-5. PubMed ID: 16294512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical practice guidelines.
    Twaddle S
    Singapore Med J; 2005 Dec; 46(12):681-6; quiz 687. PubMed ID: 16308640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.