These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18053059)
1. Quality of master impressions and related materials for fabrication of complete dentures in the UK. Al-Ahmar AO; Lynch CD; Locke M; Youngson CC J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Feb; 35(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 18053059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality of communication and master impressions for the fabrication of cobalt chromium removable partial dentures in general dental practice in England, Ireland and Wales in 2009. Kilfeather GP; Lynch CD; Sloan AJ; Youngson CC J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Apr; 37(4):300-5. PubMed ID: 20085617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality of prescription and fabrication of single-unit crowns by general dental practitioners in Wales. Jenkins SJ; Lynch CD; Sloan AJ; Gilmour AS J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Feb; 36(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 19054289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality of written prescriptions and master impressions for fixed and removable prosthodontics: a comparative study. Lynch CD; Allen PF Br Dent J; 2005 Jan; 198(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 15716882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality of written communication and master impressions for fabrication of removable partial prostheses in the Kingdom of Bahrain. Radhi A; Lynch CD; Hannigan A J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 34(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 17244238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality of materials supplied to dental laboratories for the fabrication of cobalt chromium removable partial dentures in Ireland. Lynch CD; Allen PF Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2003 Dec; 11(4):176-80. PubMed ID: 14737795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survey of prosthodontic impression procedures for complete dentures in general dental practice in the United Kingdom. Hyde TP; McCord JF J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Mar; 81(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 10050117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The quality of impressions for crowns and bridges: an assessment of the work received at three commercial dental laboratories. assessing qualities of impressions that may lead to occlusal discrepancies with indirect restorations. Storey D; Coward TJ Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2014 Mar; 22(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 24922994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A complete denture impression technique survey of postdoctoral prosthodontic programs in the United States. Mehra M; Vahidi F; Berg RW J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):320-7. PubMed ID: 24118134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts. Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surveys of Current Teaching and Practice for Impressions for Complete Dentures. Hussain N; Jabbar H; Hayati M; Wu J; Hyde TP Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2018 May; 26(2):86-93. PubMed ID: 29517876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time. Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The quality of impressions for crowns and bridges: an assessment of the work received at three commercial dental laboratories. assessing the quality of the impressions of prepared teeth. Storey D; Coward TJ Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2013 Jun; 21(2):53-7. PubMed ID: 23888527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing the quality of clinical procedures and technical standards of dental laboratories in fixed partial denture therapy. Albashaireh ZS; Alnegrish AS Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 10635191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality of communication between dental practitioners and dental technicians for fixed prosthodontics in Ireland. Lynch CD; Allen PF J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Dec; 32(12):901-5. PubMed ID: 16297037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The quality of impressions for crowns and bridges received at commercial dental laboratories. Winstanley RB; Carrotte PV; Johnson A Br Dent J; 1997 Sep; 183(6):209-13. PubMed ID: 9345799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A preliminary survey of impression trays used in the fabrication of fixed indirect restorations. Mitchell ST; Ramp MH; Ramp LC; Liu PR J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):582-8. PubMed ID: 19523024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of procedural variations during the laboratory phase of complete denture fabrication on patient satisfaction and denture quality. Omar R; Al-Tarakemah Y; Akbar J; Al-Awadhi S; Behbehani Y; Lamontagne P J Dent; 2013 Oct; 41(10):852-60. PubMed ID: 23911602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the accuracy of plastic and metal stock trays for implant impressions. Del'acqua MA; de Avila ÉD; Amaral ÂL; Pinelli LA; de Assis Mollo F Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 22616047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A survey of U.S. prosthodontists and dental schools on the current materials and methods for final impressions for complete denture prosthodontics. Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K J Prosthodont; 2005 Dec; 14(4):253-62. PubMed ID: 16359482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]