263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18053409)
1. Tailoring the size distribution of ultrasound contrast agents: possible method for improving sensitivity in molecular imaging.
Talu E; Hettiarachchi K; Zhao S; Powell RL; Lee AP; Longo ML; Dayton PA
Mol Imaging; 2007; 6(6):384-92. PubMed ID: 18053409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving sensitivity in ultrasound molecular imaging by tailoring contrast agent size distribution: in vivo studies.
Streeter JE; Gessner R; Miles I; Dayton PA
Mol Imaging; 2010 Apr; 9(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 20236606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monodisperse versus Polydisperse Ultrasound Contrast Agents: In Vivo Sensitivity and safety in Rat and Pig.
Helbert A; Gaud E; Segers T; Botteron C; Frinking P; Jeannot V
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 46(12):3339-3352. PubMed ID: 33008649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A sensitive ultrasonic imaging method for targeted contrast microbubble detection.
Zheng H; Kruse DE; Stephens DN; Ferrara KW; Sutcliffe P; Gardner E
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():5290-3. PubMed ID: 19163911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Selective imaging of adherent targeted ultrasound contrast agents.
Zhao S; Kruse DE; Ferrara KW; Dayton PA
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2055-72. PubMed ID: 17404455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monodisperse Versus Polydisperse Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Non-Linear Response, Sensitivity, and Deep Tissue Imaging Potential.
Segers T; Kruizinga P; Kok MP; Lajoinie G; de Jong N; Versluis M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1482-1492. PubMed ID: 29705522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimizing Sensitivity of Ultrasound Contrast-Enhanced Super-Resolution Imaging by Tailoring Size Distribution of Microbubble Contrast Agent.
Lin F; Tsuruta JK; Rojas JD; Dayton PA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Oct; 43(10):2488-2493. PubMed ID: 28668636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microbubble Formulations: Synthesis, Stability, Modeling and Biomedical Applications.
Upadhyay A; Dalvi SV
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Feb; 45(2):301-343. PubMed ID: 30527395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bubble sorting in pinched microchannels for ultrasound contrast agent enrichment.
Kok MP; Segers T; Versluis M
Lab Chip; 2015; 15(18):3716-22. PubMed ID: 26223966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of Acoustic Parameters and Microbubble Concentration on the Likelihood of Encapsulated Microbubble Coalescence.
Le DQ; Papadopoulou V; Dayton PA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2021 Oct; 47(10):2980-2989. PubMed ID: 34344561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acoustic characterization of monodisperse lipid-coated microbubbles: relationship between size and shell viscoelastic properties.
Parrales MA; Fernandez JM; Perez-Saborid M; Kopechek JA; Porter TM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1077. PubMed ID: 25190383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The delayed onset of subharmonic and ultraharmonic emissions from a phospholipid-shelled microbubble contrast agent.
Shekhar H; Awuor I; Thomas K; Rychak JJ; Doyley MM
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Apr; 40(4):727-38. PubMed ID: 24582298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Narrow size distribution of microbubbles for enhancement of harmonic imaging.
Moon H; Yu J; Park S; Chang JH; Song TK; Kim H
J Biomed Nanotechnol; 2013 May; 9(5):845-8. PubMed ID: 23802414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents for diagnostic and therapeutic applications: current status and future design.
Kang ST; Yeh CK
Chang Gung Med J; 2012; 35(2):125-39. PubMed ID: 22537927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimization of ultrasound contrast agents with computational models to improve selection of ligands and binding strength.
Maul TM; Dudgeon DD; Beste MT; Hammer DA; Lazo JS; Villanueva FS; Wagner WR
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2010 Dec; 107(5):854-64. PubMed ID: 20665479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the Superharmonic Response of Microbubble Contrast Agents for Acoustic Angiography as a Function of Microbubble Parameters.
Newsome IG; Kierski TM; Dayton PA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Sep; 45(9):2515-2524. PubMed ID: 31174922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Targeting and ultrasound imaging of microbubble-based contrast agents.
Klibanov AL; Hughes MS; Villanueva FS; Jankowski RJ; Wagner WR; Wojdyla JK; Wible JH; Brandenburger GH
MAGMA; 1999 Aug; 8(3):177-84. PubMed ID: 10504045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Formation of Microbubbles for Targeted Ultrasound Contrast Imaging: Practical Translation Considerations.
Unnikrishnan S; Du Z; Diakova GB; Klibanov AL
Langmuir; 2019 Aug; 35(31):10034-10041. PubMed ID: 30509068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of microbubble size on fundamental mode high frequency ultrasound imaging in mice.
Sirsi S; Feshitan J; Kwan J; Homma S; Borden M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Jun; 36(6):935-48. PubMed ID: 20447755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrasound molecular imaging.
Voigt JU
Methods; 2009 Jun; 48(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 19324089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
