BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18053703)

  • 1. Control of GHG emission at the microbial community level.
    Insam H; Wett B
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(4):699-706. PubMed ID: 18053703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Climate change mitigation for agriculture: water quality benefits and costs.
    Wilcock R; Elliott S; Hudson N; Parkyn S; Quinn J
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(11):2093-9. PubMed ID: 19092184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Agricultural opportunities to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions.
    Johnson JM; Franzluebbers AJ; Weyers SL; Reicosky DC
    Environ Pollut; 2007 Nov; 150(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 17706849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Greenhouse gas emission reduction and environmental quality improvement from implementation of aerobic waste treatment systems in swine farms.
    Vanotti MB; Szogi AA; Vives CA
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(4):759-66. PubMed ID: 18060761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. EU strategies and policies on soil and waste management to offset greenhouse gas emissions.
    Marmo L
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(4):685-9. PubMed ID: 18042371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The potential of bio-methane as bio-fuel/bio-energy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions: a qualitative assessment for Europe in a life cycle perspective.
    Tilche A; Galatola M
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(11):1683-92. PubMed ID: 18547917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing alternatives for mitigating net greenhouse gas emissions and increasing yields from rice production in China over the next twenty years.
    Li C; Salas W; DeAngelo B; Rose S
    J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(4):1554-65. PubMed ID: 16825476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of the greenhouse effect impact of technologies used for energy recovery from municipal waste: a case for England.
    Papageorgiou A; Barton JR; Karagiannidis A
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jul; 90(10):2999-3012. PubMed ID: 19482412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Greenhouse gas production in wastewater treatment: process selection is the major factor.
    Keller J; Hartley K
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):43-8. PubMed ID: 12926668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Greenhouse gases emission from municipal waste management: The role of separate collection.
    Calabrò PS
    Waste Manag; 2009 Jul; 29(7):2178-87. PubMed ID: 19318239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantification of greenhouse gas emissions from windrow composting of garden waste.
    Andersen JK; Boldrin A; Samuelsson J; Christensen TH; Scheutz C
    J Environ Qual; 2010; 39(2):713-24. PubMed ID: 20176844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the potentialities to reduce greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions resulting from various treatments of municipal solid wastes (MSW) in moist tropical climates: application to Yaounde.
    Ngnikam E; Tanawa E; Rousseaux P; Riedacker A; Gourdon R
    Waste Manag Res; 2002 Dec; 20(6):501-13. PubMed ID: 12549662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Piggery: from environmental pollution to a climate change solution.
    Maraseni TN; Maroulis J
    J Environ Sci Health B; 2008 May; 43(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 18437624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Greenhouse gas emissions from surface flow and subsurface flow constructed wetlands treating dairy wastewater.
    VanderZaag AC; Gordon RJ; Burton DL; Jamieson RC; Stratton GW
    J Environ Qual; 2010; 39(2):460-71. PubMed ID: 20176819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fundamental processes and implications during in situ aeration of old landfills.
    Ritzkowski M; Heyer KU; Stegmann R
    Waste Manag; 2006; 26(4):356-72. PubMed ID: 16442789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Greenhouse gas emissions from forestry operations: a life cycle assessment.
    Sonne E
    J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(4):1439-50. PubMed ID: 16825464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pomace waste management scenarios in QuĂ©bec--impact on greenhouse gas emissions.
    Gassara F; Brar SK; Pelletier F; Verma M; Godbout S; Tyagi RD
    J Hazard Mater; 2011 Sep; 192(3):1178-85. PubMed ID: 21733627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microbial methane oxidation processes and technologies for mitigation of landfill gas emissions.
    Scheutz C; Kjeldsen P; Bogner JE; De Visscher A; Gebert J; Hilger HA; Huber-Humer M; Spokas K
    Waste Manag Res; 2009 Aug; 27(5):409-55. PubMed ID: 19584243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Greenhouse gas balance for composting operations.
    Brown S; Kruger C; Subler S
    J Environ Qual; 2008; 37(4):1396-410. PubMed ID: 18574171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Technical options for the mitigation of direct methane and nitrous oxide emissions from livestock: a review.
    Gerber PJ; Hristov AN; Henderson B; Makkar H; Oh J; Lee C; Meinen R; Montes F; Ott T; Firkins J; Rotz A; Dell C; Adesogan AT; Yang WZ; Tricarico JM; Kebreab E; Waghorn G; Dijkstra J; Oosting S
    Animal; 2013 Jun; 7 Suppl 2():220-34. PubMed ID: 23739465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.