BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18053748)

  • 1. Proposing a manuscript peer-review checklist.
    Duchesne S; Jannin P
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(4):1783-7. PubMed ID: 18053748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating the surgery literature: can standardizing peer-review today predict manuscript impact tomorrow?
    Sosa JA; Mehta P; Thomas DC; Berland G; Gross C; McNamara RL; Rosenthal R; Udelsman R; Bravata DM; Roman SA
    Ann Surg; 2009 Jul; 250(1):152-8. PubMed ID: 19561471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reviewers' perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal.
    Snell L; Spencer J
    Med Educ; 2005 Jan; 39(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 15612905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How do peer reviewers of journal articles perform? Evaluating the reviewers with a sham paper.
    Kumar PD
    J Assoc Physicians India; 1999 Feb; 47(2):198-200. PubMed ID: 10999090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The evaluation of medical research].
    Malacara JM
    Rev Invest Clin; 1997; 49(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 9707997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How a submitted manuscript is processed.
    Peh WC; Ng KH
    Singapore Med J; 2009 Sep; 50(9):853-5; quiz 856. PubMed ID: 19787169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: how much statistical knowledge should a reviewer really know?
    Morton JP
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 19261753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research.
    Henly SJ; Dougherty MC
    Nurs Outlook; 2009; 57(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 19150263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Becoming a peer reviewer to medical education journals.
    Azer SA; Ramani S; Peterson R
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(9):698-704. PubMed ID: 22643022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Assurance of process-quality in pulmonary practice by means of a peer-review system--a pilot project].
    Fischer J; Köhler D; Magnussen H
    Pneumologie; 2006 Aug; 60(8):485-92. PubMed ID: 16933192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early editorial manuscript screening versus obligate peer review: a randomized trial.
    Johnston SC; Lowenstein DH; Ferriero DM; Messing RO; Oksenberg JR; Hauser SL
    Ann Neurol; 2007 Apr; 61(4):A10-2. PubMed ID: 17444512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Manuscript peer review: a guide for advanced practice nurses.
    Christenbery TL
    J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2011 Jan; 23(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 21208330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The ups and downs of peer review.
    Benos DJ; Bashari E; Chaves JM; Gaggar A; Kapoor N; LaFrance M; Mans R; Mayhew D; McGowan S; Polter A; Qadri Y; Sarfare S; Schultz K; Splittgerber R; Stephenson J; Tower C; Walton RG; Zotov A
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2007 Jun; 31(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 17562902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A peer review review.
    Wencel S
    Wis Med J; 1989 Sep; 88(9):27-32, 35. PubMed ID: 2588651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript.
    Provenzale JM; Stanley RJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Oct; 185(4):848-54. PubMed ID: 16177399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Author perception of peer review.
    Gibson M; Spong CY; Simonsen SE; Martin S; Scott JR
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 112(3):646-52. PubMed ID: 18757664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peer reviewing e-learning: opportunities, challenges, and solutions.
    Ruiz JG; Candler C; Teasdale TA
    Acad Med; 2007 May; 82(5):503-7. PubMed ID: 17457075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement.
    Husereau D; Drummond M; Petrou S; Carswell C; Moher D; Greenberg D; Augustovski F; Briggs AH; Mauskopf J; Loder E;
    BJOG; 2013 May; 120(6):765-70. PubMed ID: 23565948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer review to ensure quality in forensic mental health publication.
    Felthous AR; Wettstein RM
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2014; 42(3):305-14. PubMed ID: 25187283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Guide for peer reviewers of scientific article].
    Marusić M; Sambunjak D; Marusić A
    Lijec Vjesn; 2005; 127(5-6):107-11. PubMed ID: 16281469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.