These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18054282)

  • 1. Comment on: Hansen AM, Garde AH, Eller NH. Estimation of individual reference intervals in small sample sizes. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2007; 210: 471-478.
    Bjerner J
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2008 Jul; 211(3-4):465-6; author reply 467. PubMed ID: 18054282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of individual reference intervals in small sample sizes.
    Hansen AM; Garde AH; Eller NH
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2007 May; 210(3-4):471-8. PubMed ID: 17270494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Commentary regarding the article by Drasch et al.: scientific comment on the German human biological monitoring values (HBM values) for mercury. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 205, 509-512 (2002).
    German Human Biomonitoring Commission
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2004 Feb; 207(2):179-81; author reply 183-4. PubMed ID: 15031960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating standardized linear contrasts of means with desired precision.
    Bonett DG
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Mar; 14(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 19271844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On sample size calculation for 2x2 fixed-effect ANOVA when variances are unknown and possibly unequal.
    Guo JH; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):417-25. PubMed ID: 18559139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simple effect size indicator for two-group comparisons? A comment on r equivalent.
    Kraemer HC
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Dec; 10(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 16392996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study of lognormal, gamma and beta modelling in radon mapping with recommendations regarding bias, sample sizes and the treatment of outliers.
    Murphy P; Organo C
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Sep; 28(3):293-302. PubMed ID: 18714140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analyzing longitudinal data with the linear mixed models procedure in SPSS.
    West BT
    Eval Health Prof; 2009 Sep; 32(3):207-28. PubMed ID: 19679634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Model-based multiplicity estimation of population size.
    Laska EM; Meisner M; Wanderling J
    Stat Med; 2009 Jul; 28(17):2230-52. PubMed ID: 19572380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Estimation of the dental status of 3- to 5-year-old children by means of cluster samples].
    Weissbach R; Herzog M
    Gesundheitswesen; 2009 Mar; 71(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 19221982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Power and sample size estimation for the Wilcoxon rank sum test with application to comparisons of C statistics from alternative prediction models.
    Rosner B; Glynn RJ
    Biometrics; 2009 Mar; 65(1):188-97. PubMed ID: 18510654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample sizes calculations for ordered categorical data.
    Whitehead J
    Stat Med; 1996 May; 15(10):1065-6. PubMed ID: 8783443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Checking the linear transformation model for clustered failure time observations.
    Hattori S
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2008 Sep; 14(3):253-66. PubMed ID: 18240021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of sample sizes for pooled faecal sampling for detection of Salmonella in pigs.
    Arnold ME; Cook AJ
    Epidemiol Infect; 2009 Dec; 137(12):1734-41. PubMed ID: 19416556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A soil sampling reference site: the challenge in defining reference material for sampling.
    de Zorzi P; Barbizzi S; Belli M; Fajgelj A; Jacimovic R; Jeran Z; Sansone U; van der Perk M
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Nov; 66(11):1588-91. PubMed ID: 18511285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are linear regression techniques appropriate for analysis when the dependent (outcome) variable is not normally distributed?
    Li X; Wong W; Lamoureux EL; Wong TY
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 May; 53(6):3082-3. PubMed ID: 22618757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regression modeling of combined data from multiple sample surveys.
    Li L; Levy PS
    Stat Med; 2009 Jul; 28(16):2160-9. PubMed ID: 19462413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comments on 'How conservative is Fisher's exact test? A quantitative evaluation of the two-sample comparative binomial trial' by G. G. Crans and J. J. Shuster, Statistics in Medicine 2008; 27:3598-3611.
    Martín Andrés A; Herranz Tejedor I
    Stat Med; 2009 Jan; 28(1):173-4. PubMed ID: 18825654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Confidence intervals for ratios of AUCs in the case of serial sampling: a comparison of seven methods.
    Jaki T; Wolfsegger MJ; Ploner M
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(1):12-24. PubMed ID: 18407562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Functions for traditional and multilevel approaches to signal detection theory.
    Wright DB; Horry R; Skagerberg EM
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 May; 41(2):257-67. PubMed ID: 19363166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.